During the month of October 2023, Sprint Sand & Clay excavated another 5,754 cubic yards (CY) of dirt from a new stormwater detention basin on Harris County Flood Control District’s (HCFCD) Woodridge Village property. Compare that to 5,698 cubic yards in September. The new “total to date” is now 156,478 cubic yards. October’s 5,754 CY exceeds Sprint’s monthly minimum of 5,000 CY.
Perry Homes cleared and graded the property for development beginning in 2017. But insufficient stormwater detention capacity contributed to the flooding of Elm Grove and North Kingwood Forest Villages twice in 2019. HCFCD bought the property from Perry in 2021.
Terms of Excavation and Removal Contract
Sprint began excavation in January of 2022 under an Excavation and Removal Contract (E&R). Their E&R contract gives Sprint the right to remove up to 500,000 cubic yards of material for just $1,000. Sprint then makes its money back by selling the dirt at market rates.
E&R contracts often fluctuate depending on home- and road-building activity nearby. They represent good value for taxpayers because they reduce costs. But they also involve some uncertainty in terms of completion dates.
Where Things Stand at End of October
To date, here’s where things stand in relation to possible goals:
Acre Feetof Stormwater Detention
% of Atlas-14 Requirement
% of Ultimate
Site Had When Purchased from Perry Homes
271
70%
47%
Has as of 11/1/23
368
95.6%
63.4%
Atlas 14 Requires
385
100%
66%
If Sprint Excavates All 500K Cubic Yards…
580
150%
100%
As of 11/1/23
Rain always slows construction activity and it may have played a role during October.
Pictures of Progress
Here are some before/after pictures (in pairs). They show the progress of construction during October.
End of September 2023End of October 2023
It appears that most of the excavation occurred at the far end. These three shots show the progress made in that area.
End of September 2023
End of October 2023, looking NE
End of October 2023 looking SE
Looking back toward the entrance off Woodland Hills…
End of September 2023End of October 2023
How Much Will Be Enough?
HCFCD still has not released the final engineering report for this project. So, we do not know exactly what shape this detention basin will take or what the final volume will be. Regardless, it’s more protection than we had before. And when finished, it will reduce flood risk considerably.
The current rate of excavation when measured in acre feet is about 3.6 per month. That means Sprint would reach the volume required to meet Atlas 14 requirements in about 5 months – the end of the first quarter in 2024. It’s unclear at this time how much HCFCD will have Sprint go beyond that.
NOAA is already working on Atlas 15. Atlas 15 will incorporate the effects of climate change in the national precipitation frequency standards for the first time. NOAA expects estimates to increase. So the size of this detention basin could, too.
Atlas 15 will be the first national precipitation frequency analysis accounting for climate change.
NOAA expects to release the new data for peer review in 2025 and the final study in 2026. After that, NOAA will update the precipitation frequency estimates no less than once every ten years.
There is no such thing as certainty when predicting the future. The good news? There’s plenty of room on this site to expand stormwater detention volume in the future.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 11/1/2023
2255 Days since Hurricane Harvey and 1505 since TS Imelda
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/11/20231029-DJI_0721.jpg?fit=1100%2C733&ssl=17331100adminadmin2023-11-01 06:03:172023-11-26 12:21:23Woodridge Village Excavation Rate Increased Slightly in October
Item 418 on today’s Commissioners Court Agenda reads, “Request by the Commissioner of Precinct 3 [Tom Ramsey, PE] for discussion and possible action on the allocation of the Harris County 2022 Road and Park Bonds.” What’s that about?
Before the election, Commissioners court voted to allocate a minimum of $220 million to each precinct. The County then trumpeted that on its website AND at community meetings. But shortly after the election, that all changed. (See photos, screen captures below.)
Now, according to the formula adopted by Commissioners, Precinct 3 gets $32 million less than the minimum – while other precincts get up to $70 million more.
Yet Precinct 3 has 47% of the county’s roads and 35% of its parks to maintain.
But forget about fairness; the FTC calls this “bait and switch.”
In a commercial context, promising something you don’t deliver is fraudulent.
I expected better of the county’s highest elected officials.
Please Commissioners, deliver what you promised. Vote to right this wrong today.
Handout at pre-election Bond Meetingat Humble Civic CenterThe County’s $222 million promise, still evident on 2/2/23 before the vote to change the promise.Screen capture from County’s bond website, before the switcheroo.Allocation today.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/31/2023
2254 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/Flier.jpg?fit=1511%2C544&ssl=15441511adminadmin2023-10-31 09:07:462023-10-31 13:22:48Right a Wrong – Fix Bait-and-Switch Bond Allocation
After posting about the public-safety threat created by Comcast and its subcontractors yesterday, I received feedback from more than 70 people. The comments show that the safety threats are widespread and ongoing. They include:
Broken gas, electrical, water and sewer lines
Holes left open and unfenced for weeks
Unreported repairs by unlicensed, unqualified people
The comments below paint a picture of a cavalier attitude toward damage, incompetence, training and safety. That attitude is a public-safety threat in itself.
Comments totaled more than 40 pages, so I will summarize them below (including a couple received before the post). My apologies in advance if I left your comment out. Many were redundant. Let’s look at the bright side first.
Two, Tongue-in-Cheek, Positive Comments
Two people actually made semi-positive comments, although I suspect they were tongue in cheek.
One said that when Team Comcast killed a tree on his neighbor’s property, it gave him more sunlight.
And a repair man said he was making thousands of dollars fixing damage caused by Comcast, Aspen Utilities, and their subcontractors.
But the rest of the comments were unquestionably negative.
Gas, Electricity, Sewer, Water, Communication Lines Cut
One resident said, “They have been hitting everything in their path: water, sewer, and gas. We know for a fact they never requested 811 to mark any lines before they began work. This resulted in 100+ gas-line ruptures.”
Another said, “Thankfully, they’re finished in [my village]. I think. During their time here, I am aware of FIVE instances that they cut into gas lines.”
Yet another lamented, “…most of us are tired of having our yards torn up and our utilities being taken out of service by the irresponsible and incompetent contractors… I’ve seen or heard of gas lines being cut, water pipes breaking, irrigation systems being torn up and the internet that is already in place having lines cut.”
Another: “They left a giant hole in my yard and destroyed everyone’s fences. They are literally falling over. … They broke my neighbor’s plumbing. A real **** show. Not a pun.”
Another: “They hit my sewer line. And they hit a gas line a few streets down from me. They also cut my Tachus line TWICE!”
Another: “They … cut thru my TV line.”
Attempted Intimidation, Broken Promises
Aspen Utilities, Comcast’s main contractor, has tried to use the police to coerce terrified residents into cooperating with them. But in at least one case it backfired.
One resident wrote: “They called the police on me because I refused to let them in my backyard. [I wanted to talk to a supervisor first] so I could let them know all the damage they did. A red-haired punk called the police. When the officer got there, he was told (by Vincent with Aspen) to scare and intimidate me.”
“Well, guess what the officer did?” the resident continued. “He let me know that he was definitely not there to scare or intimidate me and that he has received many calls about homeowners being frustrated with the damage Aspen has done.”
“I took the officer to my back and side yard. He saw the unsecured green box with protruding wires; a clearly marked grave where they dug up our pet; and damage to our fences, trees and lawn.”
Then Aspen backtracked. “Miraculously, an Aspen supervisor arrived quickly and was in disbelief about what had been done,” said the resident. “[The supervisor] promised to have a crew come out and repair the damage. Weeks passed, no one called or came. Then a man showed up with no ID and wanted in my back yard. I refused. A lady with him got out of the truck and interpreted for him. I asked for the name of his supervisor and about a week later Fransisco came out.”
“Of course, he denied most of the damage, stated that their boring machine only parks on the street, and he had no idea why it was parked in my side yard for days. Fransisco promised that the damage would be repaired. That was about a month and a half ago. And we haven’t heard back since,” said the resident.
Another resident said, “I have damage to my yard, fences, and trees from Aspen. I can’t tell you how many phone calls made, emails sent, photos taken, visits from Aspen management/supervisors, posts on social media, etc. Aspen busted a water line while digging in my yard. There has been so much damage in our subdivisions.”
He continued, “Aspen will not correct damage they have done. I was told by a supervisor that they have the blessing from COH and all HOAs. It appears that they aren’t held accountable for their ongoing destruction and damage.” Editor’s note: Aspen most assuredly does NOT have the blessing of all HOAs.
One resident reported that, “In late September, we returned from being out of town and upon the very first flush of a toilet, the sewer line backed up into our house, flooding the master toilet area etc. … They said that yes, they had cut the sewer line while doing whatever it is they were attempting to do. … We only prayed that they actually knew what they were doing and this was a permanent fix. I guess time will tell.”
Another said, “They busted our water line and I’m not sure who repaired it. We weren’t home at the time so I don’t know. Our water bill has gone up significantly since this happened (with no difference in usage.) I surely hope it was repaired properly. When I brought this up to Francisco, he just said it happens a lot and it’s not a big deal.”
Based on a third report, those hopes may be unfounded. A third resident complained, “Two weeks ago, they began on our street. By that night, sewage was backing up in our home and several others’ homes. They said they would repair damages and we would be compensated. Fast forward. They did a horrible, shoddy, patch job that we refused and requested a licensed plumber. Today, the City came to inspect. The inspector asked me what happened, and I made him aware.”
“I showed him pictures of their repairs all over town,” said the resident, “and he was very upset. He asked for me to collect names, pictures, and addresses. He said they will be fined for every picture and address we can report. He said if a licensed plumber doesn’t make the correct repair, Kingwood will have a horrible sewage and plumbing issue that will make our property values plummet.”
The resident continued. “The City had no idea [Comcast contractors] had been hitting any water or sewer lines. He was very upset because they are, by law, supposed to report the damages, and a licensed plumber must make the repairs. When the repairs are complete, he said, the City comes and inspects them. He said what they are doing is against the law and cutting corners.”
Lengthy Delays, No Warnings as Promised
Comcast and its contractors are supposed to warn people when they will start work in neighborhoods. Even though Aspen says they distribute door hangers telling people when they will start, many residents claim they have received no warning.
In my case the start time was off by a month. The warnings also don’t explain that there may be lengthy pauses in construction, effectively creating two or more phases, months apart. Aspen has been in my neighborhood for TEN months.
One resident said, “They came out in July and put flags in my yard. Here it is in October and they are just now returning to do the work.”
Another complained “On my street, I am next in line on Monday. The work was started in July!” (Four months ago.)
A third said, “My biggest complaint is that we had zero information prior to the project getting underway about what exactly was being done, which contractors were responsible for doing what aspects of the project, and more important, what they were not allowed to do, such as parking in driveways and leaving unfilled holes. It would have been nice to get a heads up a day ahead that they would be working in our yards especially if you have dogs.”
Another said he felt as if he was a captive of Aspen’s unpredictable schedule. They came in his yard without notice and left gates open, allowing his dog to wander away.
Unfilled Holes Left Open for Months, Some Cause Injuries
Aspen contractors excavate holes to identify the location of other utilities so that Aspen can avoid them when installing Comcast lines. Aspen is supposed to cover them with plywood and surround them with orange construction fencing until they are refilled after the installation. But many residents report that they don’t.
One said, “Our lawn guys fell in a 9-foot hole [Aspen and its Contractors] did not cover. Both had to go to emergency. They contacted the lady from Aspen, who called them once and crickets after that.”
Another also reported a worker falling in an open hole: “…it was like a cartoon with the guy walking over an open manhole cover. He went in and was holding himself up by his arms and feet weren’t touching.”
Lengthy delays between the excavation and installation increase the safety risk. One lady reported two holes in her backyard for 2.5 months that her dog was beginning to enlarge. “To be on my little 5-house cul de sac on and off for 2-1/2 months was absurd. They needed to finish one area and move on to the next. They hit so many different lines along the way: sewer, gas, cable and probably others. I definitely think they are a threat to public safety.”
Another: “None of the holes in our backyard were ever covered or netted, and they left it like that for weeks.”
Another: “Too much damage is occurring with digging in the backyards. How many more cable internet companies will the city allow to dig in our backyards?”
Another: “There is no excuse for them not filling in holes. That crew sounded like The Three Stooges plumbing company, not very effective…and highly destructive.”
Another: “We still have holes at both sides of our backyard.”
The City of Houston’s Department of Neighborhoods levies fines up to $2,000 each for unfilled excavations. So report unfilled, unmarked holes!
Reader-supplied photo shows Comcast hole only partially covered.
Not Observing Best Practices, Lack of Supervision
One man who worked in communication construction wrote: “Where are the Comcast Field Engineers (inspectors)? I rarely see a Comcast representative in Kingwood and I’ve never seen one outside of his truck actually inspecting.”
“Traffic control is non-existent,” continued the resident. “Traffic can get dicey when construction equipment is parked at the curb of a curved street. This requires driving into oncoming traffic and passing blindly with my fingers crossed. Where are their flaggers?”
But he didn’t stop there. “Construction spoils/dirt accumulates on the roadway in some areas and sure gets slick when it rains. This should be swept with a power broom by Aspen but there aren’t any inspectors to enforce it. Shouldn’t the C/O/H have an inspector watching roadway safety?”
He also pointed out other best practices being ignored.
Digging/Dirt work – “I’ve witnessed many pits that are six to eight feet deep. I’ve seen a few that are deeper. I haven’t seen any attention to safety. Trenches or pits or any excavation requires shoring or a step-back cut on anything deeper than five feet. Cave-ins are quick and deadly.”
Open pits/excavation – “If a child or anyone falls in a hole, the presence of plywood and construction netting will not hold up in court. The holes should be filled in or covered with steel plates. But that costs money.”
Restoration – “You’ve seen it. It’s almost nonexistent and usually substandard.”
The resident is now retired, but formerly managed construction of large communication projects from coast to coast. He added:
“I would have been fired for ever allowing this type of work.”
Communications Construction Manager
Believes Problems Rooted in Corporate Culture
One reader, whose husband worked for a Comcast competitor reported that he had seen such problems before. “My husband worked for 26 years on the construction side of Verizon and sometimes had to work alongside Comcast and the contracting companies they hired. We’re very familiar with how they work. If at a point, the contracting company realizes that something hasn’t been prepped (i.e., lines located), they should be standing up to Comcast and saying they won’t dig until that something has happened, but [in Comcast’s case] they don’t.”
Another said, “They did the cheapest job possible and cut as many corners as possible to save a dime. Now they are just feeding us all BS and giving us all the run around.”
One of my neighbors, who flooded badly during Harvey, has kept smiling throughout the disastrous Comcast installation. He said, “Cue the Benny Hill soundtrack when Comcast trucks show up.”
For More Information on How, Where to Report Damage
Comcast and the City claim they aren’t hearing about damage from Kingwood residents. How can you make sure the right people hear about what Comcast and its contractors did to you? See this post or click on the picture below.
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Kingwood231028d5st-e1698595939180.jpg?fit=1100%2C2027&ssl=120271100adminadmin2023-10-29 11:17:432023-11-02 15:45:43Feedback on Comcast Post Shows Public-Safety Threat Widespread
I have received a flood of complaints recently about a threat to public safety: the Comcast/Xfinity installation by Aspen Utilities now underway in Kingwood. Yesterday, I experienced the threat firsthand when an Aspen crew cut into a neighbor’s CenterPoint gas line. Ironically, the CenterPoint line had already been exposed and identified. Fire department and CenterPoint personnel were shocked and shaking their heads in disbelief.
Sadly, this was not an isolated instance. It raises questions about the competence of the installers and whether having a third internet provider in a crowded utility easement is a threat to public safety.
A Brutal Wake-Up Call
Yesterday morning, I heard a noise near my driveway. Upon investigation, I found two fire trucks, EMS and CenterPoint had sealed off my entire block (near Kingwood High School). Aspen had cut into a CenterPoint gas line. The scene looked like this.
Aspen truck in foreground. Emergency equipment stretched out for a block.HFD ran a hose to the gas-line break. Traffic in background was stopped then turned around.Contractors were standing well back from break on opposite side of street.Note more emergency equipment down the street.Hydro-excavation trucks like these locate and expose other utility lines so companies like Aspen can dig around them.
The crew of the hydro-excavation truck above had located the gas line and exposed it after digging a 20-foot trench in a neighbor’s yard. Regardless, the Aspen crew managed to cut the gas line anyway.
Fire/EMS crews responded in an abundance of caution even though no fires or injuries resulted from the incident.
The incident cut off traffic on Valley Manor for several hours. And while first responders were standing by here, they weren’t available to handle other emergencies elsewhere.
Houston EMS charges residents for call-outs. Are they charging Aspen?
Recurring Problem
If this were an isolated incident, I would be praising the first responders instead of condemning the apparent incompetence of Aspen. This isn’t the first time such an incident has happened in my neighborhood.
A CenterPoint employee told me that he often receives three to four such calls a day in Kingwood.
To me, that constitutes a threat to public safety. And raises some questions about the competence of Comcast contractors.
As an HOA board member, I’ve received dozens of complaints about Comcast/Aspen incidents and also heard from other HOA’s. Problems have included, but are not limited to:
Damage to sewer lines which caused sewage backups/overflows in homes
Damage to driveways and sidewalks
Water main disruption
Electricity disruption
Damage to landscaping
Excavations left open and unprotected (subject to fines up to $2000 by the City of Houston Department of Neighborhoods).
These are not nuisance complaints related to noise or aesthetics. With the exception of landscaping, they’re serious safety hazards.
I’ve heard of one family forced to leave their home for weeks because of damage caused by Aspen and its subcontractors. Stories pour in almost daily. Damage has run into the tens and even hundreds of thousands of dollars in some cases.
Third Time Isn’t the Charm
Comcast’s installation is the third such project in recent years. Suddenlink, aka Optimum, upgraded its old coaxial system to optical fiber. Then Tachus entered the market. Comcast quickly followed.
No utility installation is problem-free. However, in my opinion, neither of the first two efforts seemed to cause as many problems as Comcast. Nor did the problems seem to be as severe.
Others may disagree with that. Especially those who were damaged. But based solely on my call volume and hours spent dealing with complaints, Team Comcast is the “winner” of the Kingwood Smackdown.
Damage Issues Complicated by Compensation Runaround
I have no prior experience with Comcast. Nor do I have any old scores to settle. Also know that I’m a great believer in competition. If Aspen were compensating people fairly for damage, I might be more understanding.
But another neighbor’s driveway was seriously damaged by Aspen and/or its subs. They apparently parked a hydro-vac truck on top of the drive and/or drilled under it – perhaps at different times – while the homeowner was away.
After the homeowner called numerous Comcast and Aspen people around the country, Aspen said they would pay for the damage.
Then, they sent “a former detective with police experience” to investigate. He denied the claim based on a crack that showed up in a Google Street-View photo taken before the incident. The denial happened even though an Aspen VP said in an open community meeting, “There’s no way one of those trucks should have been in a private driveway.”
The homeowner is still arguing with Aspen. Aspen refuses to acknowledge the difference between a pre-existing crack and a deeply rutted and deformed driveway with large chunks jutting up, and other areas smashed down and crumbling.
The irony is that earlier I stood on the driveway in question with that VP from Aspen when we were trying to solve another problem related to the placement of a Comcast junction box. He knows the driveway didn’t look then like it looks now.
My advice:
If you see Aspen coming, immediately take “before” photos of your property. You may need them in court to prove damages.
Notify everyone in sight if problems develop – immediately. That includes Aspen, the City, Comcast, your insurance company, your neighbors, your HOA and your lawyer.
Team Comcast seems to thrive in an environment where people don’t compare notes and see patterns.
Unanswered Questions?
Why should a utility’s right to offer service give it the right to damage property?
Why doesn’t Aspen have better supervisors in the field?
Who at Comcast is supervising Aspen?
And who at the City is supervising Comcast?
For More Information on How, Where to Report Damage
Comcast and the City claim they aren’t hearing about damage from Kingwood residents. How can you make sure the right people hear about what Comcast and its contractors did to you? See this post or click on the picture below.
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20231027-RJR_2973.jpg?fit=1100%2C733&ssl=17331100adminadmin2023-10-28 06:37:522023-11-02 15:39:20When Does an Amenity Become a Threat to Public Safety?
October 26, 2023 – The $100 million Northpark Drive expansion project in Kingwood is making steady progress. But in some areas, the action is behind-the-scenes and out of sight for commuters. Let me describe the key highlights for this last week in October. Let’s start west of US59 and move east.
Sidewalk Extension to Kingwood College
Contractors have begun building sidewalks that will eventually connect Kingwood with Kingwood College. This will enable students who cannot afford vehicles to walk or ride bikes to school, saving money that they can put toward their educations. (Most of us can remember what that was like!) Right now, contractors are working to lay-out the forms west of the US59, on TxDOT right-of-way. The sidewalks will extend westward toward Rock Creek on both the north and south sides of the road.
Looking ENE from west of 59 along the north side of Northpark.Note new bed for sidewalk.Same direction but looking at the beginning of a new sidewalk along the south side of Northpark.
Brush Piles Removed
At the US59/Northpark intersection, contractors have removed huge brush piles and taken soil samples in preparation for excavation of detention basins. However, some trees still need to be transplanted, especially south of Northpark.
Huge brush piles have been removed. Looking S from E of 59 at where north entry pond will go.
Entry Pond Drainage Pipe
Contractors are installing a 12′ waterline on the north side of Northpark to take stormwater from the two new entry ponds at 59 toward Bens Branch and the Kingwood Diversion Ditch.
Looking west toward 59. Note excavation for pipe on the N (right) side of Northpark.
Tree Transplantation
Between 59 and 494, contractors have begun transplanting trees in preparation for widening the street.
Railroad Agreement and Road Closure
The UnionPacific railroad and City of Houston have an interlocal agreement going before City Council on Wednesday, November 1, 2023. The agreement provides for the contractor’s right-of-entry and will allow private utilities to relocate their facilities now, in advance of the reconstruction of two at-grade crossings. Once approved by the City, progress in that area should quickly become more visible. Ralph De Leon, Northpark Project Manager, says he has been working to clear this hurdle since 2015!
When construction begins, UP will need to close Northpark at some point for three days to replace a section of track and update crossing signals. The new signals will provide better integration with other crossings up and down the track.
Widening of Ditch 1
Behind Public Storage, contractors are beginning to construct the new outfall, and clear and grub “Ditch 1” for more than 800 feet. This will help channel runoff down to Bens Branch and the Kingwood Diversion Ditch. It will create an alternate route to evacuate excess stormwater that collects in the detention basins at the US59 Northpark entry. Ditch 1 will parallel Northpark behind the businesses on the north side of the street.
Looking east atDitch 1 north of Northpark. It is being widened to 40 feet.
Water Main Conflict Resolved
Just past Russell-Palmer, the conflict with a church water main has finally been solved. The City approved a plan to reroute the water under the 6’x8′ box culverts being installed in the center ditch. Once rerouted, contractors will go back and install the missing sections of culvert. They will also place a concrete collar around the splice in the sections of culvert to seal it..
Detention Capacity Expansion
Engineers are studying different scenarios to increase the detention capacity of Ditch 1 north of Northpark. They’re also working on solutions to distribute water between Bens Branch and the Kingwood Diversion Ditch, so as not to overwhelm the capacity of either.
Phase II Kicking Off in January
Planning for Phase II of the project (east of the Kingwood Diversion Ditch) has begun. Engineers are examining designs for a pedestrian tunnel near Glade Valley. The tunnel would accommodate extra wide wheelchairs used by clients at the Village Learning Center who shuttle between the Center and jobs along Northpark.
Detail from Diversion Ditch to Woodland Hills. For complete, higher res version, see below.
Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ 10 will hold two public meetings. The first is scheduled for January 11, 2024, at the Kingwood Community Center to discuss Phase II and solicit input from other groups and residents.
Additionally, the Engineers are studying different scenarios to increase the detention capacity on the north side of Northpark Drive at Ben’s Branch in order to reduce flooding further south on Ben’s Branch. Potential solutions include detention basins and diverting more water down the Kingwood Diversion Ditch. The Diversion Ditch is being expanded as part of a separate project.
For More Information
The Northpark expansion project has two purposes:
Reduce traffic congestion/commute times
Create an all-weather evacuation route for 70,000 people who might be affected by floods or train mishaps.
You can review progress of the job by browsing these previous ReduceFlooding.com posts:
NWS cautions that wildfires can leave lasting effects on the landscape and create a heightened risk of flooding for years.
Locations downhill and downstream from burned areas are highly susceptible to Flash Flooding and Debris Flows, especially in and near steep terrain.
In some areas, where the fire burned hot enough or long enough, soils develop a layer that actually repels water, like rain on pavement. Rainfall normally absorbed by the forest canopy and vegetative debris on the ground will instead quickly run off.
Because of this, much less rainfall is required to produce a flash flood, and the potential for debris flows increases with the loss of plant material that holds the soil in place.
A good rule of thumb is: “If you can look uphill from where you are and see a burnt-out area, you are at risk.”
Debris flows are fast-moving, deadly landslides. They are powerful mixtures of mud, rocks, boulders, entire trees – and sometimes, homes or vehicles. You’ll often hear “debris flows” called “mudslides” or “mudflows”. Many people use the terms interchangeably, but to scientists, each is a different kind of landslide and debris flows are the most powerful and dangerous of the three.
What Causes Debris Flow?
Debris flows occur most commonly during intense rain after wildfires. A debris flow doesn’t need a long rain or a saturated slope. It can start on a dry slope after only a few minutes of intense rain.
“Intense” rain means a burst of rain at a fast rate, about half an inch in an hour. With debris flows, the rainfall rate matters more than total rainfall.
Why are Debris Flows so Dangerous?
Debris flows are fast and unpredictable. They can travel faster than you can run – and they can catch up to your car! Also, no one can say precisely where a debris flow will start or where it will go. It may begin in a stream channel, then jump out and spread through a neighborhood. A debris flow may happen where others have occurred, or in a place that has never seen one before.
Relationship to Drought
Droughts often create fuel for fires. Not long ago, SE Texas was in an extreme drought. Moderate rains recently may make it feel as though the drought is over, but in reality, we are still officially in a severe drought.
FEMA warns that it can take up to FIVE years after a fire for the landscape to restore itself enough to reduce flood risk.
Still skeptical? Check out this BBC story about rainfall triggering flood warnings FOUR years after wildfires devastated parts of New South Wales and Victoria in Australia.
All the more reason to be cautious when camping or burning brush.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/25/2023
2248 Days since Hurricane Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/20231025-Screenshot-2023-10-25-at-5.07.04%E2%80%AFPM.jpg?fit=1100%2C645&ssl=16451100adminadmin2023-10-25 18:02:002023-10-26 06:49:35Why Floods Often Follow Fires
In fact, there seemed to be twice as many machines as they had then. And there were no lines! Gee, I wonder where all those machines came from and why they actually worked. But I guess we will never know. The county is still fighting to keep those records secret.
The lack of major malfunctions seemed to have everyone in courteous and pleasant moods.
I like the new system – which is actually the old system – where elected officials are in charge of elections instead of appointed screwups with no experience.
Let’s hope our luck holds and the next ten days are like today.
For More Information
A wide variety of information about the election can be found at HarrisVotes.com. For instance:
Remember, we have county-wide voting now. So if by chance, you encounter a long line, you can vote at another location.
And remember to breathe when you check in. In the last election, a number of dead people voted. So, breathing is one of the screening tools now.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/24/2023
2247 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Early-Voting-Locations.jpg?fit=1100%2C636&ssl=16361100adminadmin2023-10-24 17:10:162023-10-24 17:37:19Vote: Doors are Unlocked, They Still Have Paper and Machines are Working
FEMA has published two flood-mitigation guides on nature-based solutions showing how communities can develop projects with multiple benefits.
Both are titled “Building Community Resilience with Nature-Based Solutions.” But one focuses on “Strategies for Success.” The other focuses on “A Guide for Local Communities.” Together, they build a case for integrating green and gray solutions to improve resilience.
While geared toward policy makers, planners and flood-mitigation professionals, they will also help community leaders, activists, students and anyone interested in weaving green solutions into flood mitigation, whether on the watershed, community or household level.
These are not technical guides. They focus on high-level benefits and are packed with helpful examples and case studies. The writing is clear, compelling and easy to understand.
“Strategies for Success” Summarized
Strategies for Success is organized around five major themes.
Building strong partnerships
Engaging the whole community
Matching project size with desired goals and benefits.
Maximizing benefits.
Designing for the future.
If you wonder what the term “nature-based solutions” includes, see pages 17-22. They complement gray (engineered) solutions in many ways in many environments.
At the watershed scale, they can include:
Land conservation
Greenways
Wetland restoration and protection
Stormwater parks
Floodplain restoration
Fire management
Bike trails
Setback levees
Habitate management
At the neighborhood or site scale, they include:
Rain gardens
Vegetated swales
Green roofs
Rainwater harvesting
Permeable pavement
Tree canopy
Tree trenches
Green streets
Urban greenspace
In coastal areas, they include:
Wetlands
Oyster reefs
Dunes
Waterfront parks
Living shorelines
Coral reef
Sand trapping
The section about maximizing benefits will help leaders sell such projects to their communities. It contains helpful tips that improve value and case studies that dramatize it.
The guides also come with links to additional resources.
“Guide for Local Communities” Summarized
This guide begins by reprising many of the same solutions mentioned above. Then it quickly moves into three main sections:
Building the business case for nature-based solutions summaries their potential cost savings and non-monetary benefits. They include:
Hazard mitigation benefits in a variety of situations/locations
Community co-benefits, such as ecosystem services, economic benefits, and social benefits
Community cost savings, such as avoided flood losses, reduced stormwater management costs, reduced drinking water treatment costs.
Planning and Policy Making covers:
Land-use planning
Hazard mitigation planning
Stormwater management
Transportation planning
Open-space planning
Implementation includes:
Boosting public investment
Financing through grants and low interest loans
How to incentivize private investment
Federal funding opportunities
Key takeaways include:
Communities that invest in nature-based approaches can save money, lives, and property in the long-term AND improve quality of life in the short term. Other key takeaways are:
The biggest selling point for nature-based solutions is the many ways they can improve a community’s quality of life and make it more attractive to new residents and businesses.
Diverse partners must collaborate.
Scaling up will require communities to align public and private investments.
Many types of grant programs can be leveraged for funding.
I’ll add one more: It’s easier to build these into communities as they are developing rather than retrofit them after the fact.
Local Examples
Regardless, the right combination of green solutions can make a valuable supplement to flood mitigation in every community.
The 5,000 acre Lake Houston Park provides recreational amenities and flood protection to surrounding areas.
Many great examples of a nature-based solutions surround us locally. Look at Lake Houston Park; Kingwood and The Woodlands which have greenbelts and bike trails along creeks; the Spring Creek Greenway; and the Bayou Land Conservancy’s Arrowwood Preserve.
Recreational asset and flood-mitigation project.
Parks like Kingwood’s East End make more great examples. East End preserves wetlands, accommodates tens of thousands of visitors each year, and provides valuable habitat for wildlife.
Interested in getting more projects like this started near you? As a starting point, please share these brochures with leaders in your community. And support local groups seeking to preserve green spaces such as the Bayou Land Conservancy.
Two nights ago I started to hug my wife. “Not tonight,” she said.
“What’s wrong,” I asked. “Headache?”
“No,” she sighed. “Climate change.”
The temperature in the room dropped about 10 degrees.
“I see what you mean,” I said.
Ironically, the next morning, I opened the New York Times to an article by Brooke Jarvis. The title: “Climate Change Is Keeping Therapists Up at Night: How anxiety about the planet’s future is transforming the practice of psychotherapy.”
It began with the experience of one psychotherapist to bring issues into focus. He said that many potential patients are looking for someone to talk to about climate change, only to be told (by others, not him) that they are overreacting.
Climate Psychology Alliance of North America and Eco-Anxiety
Enter stage left a group of about 100 “climate-aware” psychotherapists who call themselves the Climate Psychology Alliance of North America. According to Jarvis, they primarily deal with three types of issues:
Acute trauma of living through climate disasters
Fear of a collapsing future
Psychosocial decay from disruptive changes.
Collectively, they call it “eco-anxiety” or “a chronic fear of environmental doom.”
It’s not clear from the rest of Jarvis’ story whether the psychotherapists have reached any consensus yet about how to treat this emerging malady.
Conflicting Info About Breadth of Concerns
Jarvis cites a nationally representative 2022 survey of more than 1,000 people from Yale and George Mason University. Researchers found that a majority of Americans (64%) say they are at least “somewhat worried” about global warming.
However, Jarvis does not report that the same research also found about 90% of Americans experience no distress at all about global warming.
Should psychotherapists bring climate concerns up even when clients don’t? That’s not clear either.
But the climate psychologists agree that they should validate their clients’ climate-related emotions as “reasonable, not pathological.” The climate shrinks believe they should make clients feel their fear is a “rational response to a world that’s very scary.”
Link between Eco-Reporting and Eco-Anxiety Not Examined
While not denying climate change, I also personally believe the threat may be artificially exaggerated.
The New York Times article does not examine eco-reporting that contributes to eco-anxiety. Some days, I’m afraid to open a newspaper because I may find Republicans can’t elect a speaker…due to climate change. (Just joking.)
Comments on the New York Times article seemed polarized. About half felt eco-anxiety was justified. The other half felt it was manufactured by media.
In that regard, I have previously posted about the Associated Press policy of taking money from foundations with interests in renewable energy to hire 20 reporters who focus on climate change.
Before the Internet undermined local newspapers, news organization sold advertising to generate revenue that paid employees. Ads clearly showed client’s logos. News organizations jealously guarded their editorial integrity; news almost never crossed the line into advertising.
That’s no longer the case. Now, 20 reporters are looking for any way possible to connect random weather events to climate change…using the most tenuous of threads. And if they can’t find one, they say, “So-and-so worries that climate change may make his problem worse in the future.” But they present no real statistical proof.
Not to make light of anyone’s feelings or circumstances, as I scrolled through other headlines this morning, I learned that…
Droughtsmay intensify in the Amazon in the future…due to climate change.
Fewer young peoplemay fish in Alaska in the future…due to climate change.
Such stories are rapidly becoming a parody of themselves. Regardless…
Repetition Makes Claims Rise to Level of Assumed Truth
Through sheer repetition of such claims day after day, people assume their truth. Individual events such as a flood, drought, freeze, heatwave or windstorm may or may not exemplify larger trends. But reports rarely present actual proof they do.
Rather, they quote people who have suffered some kind of weather-related damage and who fear such events may become more common in the future…due to climate change.
Of course, who can disprove the future? That’s pretty safe ground for a reporter.
I asked one of the area’s leading psychotherapists in Houston to review the New York Times article. She replied, “Climate change didn’t come up once in my 40 years of private practice.”
Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/22/23
2245 Days since Hurricane Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/IMG_0205-e1698010167513.jpg?fit=1100%2C825&ssl=18251100adminadmin2023-10-22 16:53:292023-10-22 17:46:12Welcome to Climate Psychotherapy
Homebuyers beware. Flood risk is a shifting target.
This morning, I began reading more than 100 pages of legal briefs in the appeal of the upstream Addicks and Barker awards. I could not help but think how hundreds of millions of dollars in losses and untold heartbreak could have been averted with more due diligence on the part of all involved – buyers, developers and the Army Corps.
Background of Case
For those new to the area, Addicks and Barker are two reservoirs on Houston’s west side. The Army Corps built them back in the 1930s to protect downtown Houston and the ship channel. However, the Corps did not buy all the land inside the reservoirs that was subject to flooding. Later, developers started building on that land. And people bought the homes despite the risks.
During Harvey, hundreds of homes built inside the reservoirs flooded. Residents sued the Corps and won. But the Corps is now appealing the case.
In 2022, a judge ruled in favor of the residents and awarded them more than half a billion in damages. The damages included repair costs, replacement of belongings, and compensation for value lost in their property. But facing hundreds of millions of dollars in payouts, the government isn’t giving up easily. It appealed.
The case has taken more than six years to get to this point and it is far from over. No telling what the legal fees have cost both sides. Or whether plaintiffs will ever see a penny.
This should serve as a lesson to everyone buying a home and to their real estate agents, mortgage lenders, and surveyors.
Tools to Help You Avoid Becoming a Flood Victim
Although tools to identify flood risk may not have been commonly available and readily understandable when the plaintiffs bought homes inside the reservoirs, such tools do exist now.
They both show the extent of potential flooding in this area, but each has different strengths. And they show slightly different results. That should raise some cautions if you think of risk as a black-or-white issue.
Use USGS National Map for Elevations, Slopes, Contours
You can layer these maps and vary their transparency. But the real magic of the USGS National Map is in the measurement tool for elevation profiling. Below is an example.
After activating the elevation profile tool, I drew a line from a residential neighborhood inside the Barker Reservoir, across the dam, to an area outside the reservoir. I chose an area in the southwest corner of the reservoir that flooded during Harvey. It showed this.
Note elevation changes on right where line crosses the dam (gray bar). Homes above the gray are inside reservoir.
The red X shows the height of the dam (108 feet) in the elevation profile. The brown area in the elevation-profile box shows the elevation of the dam, homes, streets and drainage channels.
Homes are generally 6-8 feet BELOW the height of the dam. That should be a giant red flag for anyone considering buying a house inside the reservoir.
Next, zooming out, I turned on the hydro layer. The red circle below, indicated the approximate area and location of the map above.
Note how the flood pool of the reservoir extends beyond the entire neighborhood shown above.
FEMA National Flood Hazard Layer Viewer for Floodplain Information
FEMA actually uses the elevation information from the USGS national map. But FEMA superimposes floodplains to show flood risk in several zones.
Note difference in two maps above in their bottom left corners. FEMA shows some homes inside the reservoir that are outside of mapped flood zones. Aqua = 100-year and tan = 500-year floodplains.
The difference noted above raises an important point. FEMA’s maps are estimates of the probability of unknown future events based on the frequency of extremely rare past events. Those estimates may not have been in effect when the neighborhood in question was built around the time of Tropical Storm Allison in 2001. Maps based on Allison weren’t adopted until around 2007 and are still in effect today.
Harris County Flood Control and FEMA update flood maps periodically when new monster storms come along and surpass past rainfall probability estimates. For instance, FEMA is working on new flood maps based on Harvey, but has not yet released them.
So, if you’re thinking of betting your life savings on a home in a risky area, the best things to do are these:
Ask yourself, “Can I afford to lose everything?” Many families in the reservoirs did.
Consult an independent engineer without any financial incentive in the purchase, i.e., making the deal go though.
Evaluate a variety of homes, not just one. And look closely at the safety margins.
If a home is two feet above the 100-year floodplain, look for one that’s higher. Things change regularly, usually in one direction.
Make “flood avoidance” more important than kitchen appliances in your purchase decision.
A Cautionary Tale Based on Personal Experience
Back in the early 1980s, I owned a house in Dallas near a creek that an engineer and the city certified were 2-feet above the 100-year floodplain. The home flooded within two years, due to rapid, insufficiently mitigated growth upstream.
Several years later, when I bought a house in Kingwood, I looked at ten homes and bought the one on the highest ground. More than 30 years later, all nine of the others flooded during Harvey even though they were all reportedly above the 100-year flood plain.
For a thorough description of why flood risk is a moving target, read this post – Why Do We Flood?
After two years of drought, it’s easy to become complacent about flood risk. Don’t. Ask anyone who has flooded. They will tell you. Your life can change overnight. So homebuyers beware.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/21/2023
2244 Days since Hurricane Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/10/Barker-Hydro.jpg?fit=1200%2C842&ssl=18421200adminadmin2023-10-21 18:33:462023-10-21 18:57:57Homebuyers Beware: Flood Risk is Shifting Target