Flood Planning Group Lists Recommendations for San Jacinto Basin

10/1/26 – The San Jacinto Regional Flood Planning Group has issued a list of recommendations for the river basin. The draft recommendations are intended for the next statewide flood plan. The 36 recommendations fall in three categories:

  • Legislative (12)
  • Administrative and Regulatory (16)
  • Flood Planning (8)

To see the complete five-page list, click here. It shows more detailed explanations than the summary below.

Legislative Recommendations

Legislative recommendations focus primarily on funding and regulatory authority.

  • L1 – Provide recurring funding for the Flood Infrastructure Fund
  • L2 – Establish state dedicated drainage funding, rather than relying solely on federal funding.
  • L3 – Provide counties with legislative authority to establish drainage utilities and assess drainage fees to assist in the implementation and long-term maintenance and repair of drainage and flood risk reduction projects
  • L4 – Update current statewide building codes with appropriate freeboard or higher flood standards
  • L5 – Establish and fund a levee safety program
  • L6 – Fund Regional Flood Planning Groups between planning cycles
  • L7 – Clarify and expand county regulatory authority for floodplain management, land-use planning, waterway setbacks, permitting, and management of new development in unincorporated areas
  • L8 – Develop and fund repair programs that assist owners of aging dams
  • L9 – Expand funding for flood early warning systems, stream gages, low-water crossing safety improvements, flood-hazard signage, gates, and roadway warning systems
  • L10 – Provide funding and incentives for conservation easements, land conservation, restoration, riparian protection, wetland protection, and landowner stewardship practices in flood-prone areas
  • L11 – Expand or create grant programs for ongoing operations and maintenance of existing flood mitigation, drainage, culvert, and natural infrastructure assets. (Most funding prioritizes new assets.)
  • L12 – Support creation, consolidation, or reorganization of regional flood authorities, flood-control districts, river authority programs, drainage districts where broader regional coordination is needed.

Most of these seem like common sense. Some have been attempted before. For instance, State Rep. Dennis Paul has tried several times to get a river-basin-wide flood control district. However, his bill failed because some local authorities, like Adrian Garcia, fear loss of control.

Regulatory and Administrative Recommendations

These focus mainly on technical and human issues below the state level.

  • A1 – Convert Base Level Engineering (BLE) data into regulatory information or detailed Flood Insurance Rate Maps.
  • A2 – Develop model floodplain ordinances for General Law Cities, i.e., those with populations under 5000.
  • A3 – Promote public education and outreach regarding flood awareness, preparedness, flood-prone areas, and the importance of protecting floodplains.
  • A4 – Educate floodplain managers with low-cost online resources. Many managers in smaller Texas cities and counties have the title without the education.
  • A5 – Develop state incentives for local governments to participate in the FEMA National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) and Community Rating System (CRS) program. CRS exceeds minimum requirements of NFIP and will help achieve state flood plan requirements.
  • A6 – Establish a publicly available statewide database to track flood-related fatalities
  • A7 – Help smaller jurisdictions prepare flood-grant applications by making the process easier
  • A8 – Model future flood conditions uniformly across the state
  • A9 – Reduce barriers that hinder jurisdictions from partnering to provide regional flood-mitigation solutions.
  • A10 – Promote nature-based solutions, green infrastructure, floodplain preservation, conservation, and hybrid gray/green approaches
  • A11 – Establish statewide building standards for minimum finished-floor elevations above the 500-year floodplain
  • A12 – Incentivize voluntary buyouts for repetitively flooded properties and turn them into green space
  • A13 – Require TXDoT to build roads above the Atlas 14/100-year floodplain or else the pre-existing 500-year floodplain
  • A14 – Improve methods for measuring and documenting flood damages, including uninsured losses, actual flooded structures, financial damages, agricultural damages, and industrial losses, rather than just relying on flood-insurance claims which undercount damages and economic consequences.
  • A15 – Support multi-jurisdictional cooperation at the evaluation, strategy and project levels.
  • A16 – Clarify roles and responsibilities for floodplain management in extraterritorial jurisdiction (ETJ) areas to reduce gaps or overlaps in responsibility for floodplain management, permitting, and drainage standards.

Flood-Planning Recommendations

These aim to help Regional Flood-Planning groups by changing or clarifying the rules under which they operate.

  • F1 – Clarify what constitutes an “emergency.” Regional flood plans must indicate whether a flood-control solution meets and emergency need – without defining emergency. This results in inconsistency across the state.
  • F2 – Simplify requirements for flood-mitigation projects. Don’t automatically eliminate projects missing a benefit/cost analysis (BCA), for instance, during the planning phase if the BCA can be supplied early in the design phase.
  • F3 – Revise scoring criteria for projects that benefit agriculture so they can compete with urban projects
  • F4 – Eliminate bias against lower-population rural areas in scoring of projects
  • F5 – Likewise, eliminate scoring bias against nature-based flood-solutions with stand-alone metrics for their evaluation.
  • F6 – Reduce future flood risk by prioritizing projects that improve FEMA floodplain maps and Base-Flood Elevations.
  • F7 – Improve flood-risk identification by incorporating first-finished-floor elevations and better population-at-risk methods. Many living spaces are elevated above base-flood levels.
  • F8 – Simplify the flood-plan amendment process. Let newly developed projects be amended into regional flood plans between full planning cycles.

Grappling with Unknown Flood Risk

Right now, about 20% of the Texas population lives in a mapped floodplain.

Residential bldgs in Texas 1 % floodplains from state flood plan.
Residential buildings in Texas 1% Annual Chance Floodplains. From 2023 Texas State Flood Plan.

But many people face flood risk they may not realize they have. Current FEMA flood maps resemble a patchwork quilt that incorporates risk studies taken by different groups using different technologies at different points in time. And many streams remain unmapped.

Uniformly updating flood risk maps will likely increase the percentage of the population living in floodplains. In areas with outdated or incomplete maps, residents may face risks revealed by newer rainfall data and hydraulic modeling.

Adopting all these recommendations will go a long way toward protecting the public from future floods and filling the readiness gaps that exist across the river basin and state. Without accurate diagnosis of problems, we will never arrive at viable solutions.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 10/1/2026

3320 Days since Harvey

San Jacinto Flood-Planning Group Inventories Readiness in Region

9/30/2026 – As part of the next update of the Texas State Flood Plan, the San Jacinto Regional Flood-Planning Group (SJRFPG) recently inventoried gaps in the the readiness of governmental entities to cope with the next major disaster. They also identified ways to help reduce flood damage.

At the group’s most recent meeting in September, they reviewed two items of interest to everyone in the region:

  1. A draft of Chapter 7 in their plan which covers gaps in:
  • Flood preparedness, response and recovery capabilities for all governmental entities in the region (local communities, counties, state agencies and federal agencies)
  • County Hazard Mitigation Plans
  • Evacuation routes
  • Flood warning Systems
  • Emergency Operations Centers
  • Recovery operations

2. Four pages of Legislative, Regulatory and Administrative Recommendations to reduce flood damage.

I’ll summarize the gaps today and recommendations tomorrow.

Flood-Preparedness and -Response Gaps

The documents contain some eyebrow-raising information in concise, easy-to-read tables and text. For instance, when reviewing flood preparedness and the immediate response after a flood:

  • Galveston, Montgomery and San Jacinto Counties have no publicly listed links to their Hazard Mitigation Plans, even though they have the plans themselves.
  • Of the 11 counties in the region:
  • Only Brazoria had a publicly available emergency action plan
  • Eight have flood-gauge websites where the public can monitor river/bayou levels
  • No county publicly identified flood-preparation teams, suggesting that such programs may be managed internally by emergency management departments without public documentation.
  • Liberty County has no Emergency Operations Center.
  • All counties provide emergency road closure information, but most don’t have dedicated websites for that purpose.
  • The availability of high-water-rescue resources was described as only “moderately high.”
  • No counties maintained publicly available lists of flood shelters.
  • Comprehensive information regarding the number and location of resource distribution centers, emergency supplies and shelter capacities is not publicly available.

Flood-Recovery Gaps

FEMA defines flood recovery as actions taken after a flood necessary to return to pre-flood conditions. It includes activities such as:

  • Damage Assessment
  • Debris Removal
  • Housing Solutions
  • Clothing Distribution Locations
  • First Aid
  • Buyouts
  • Disaster Event Records

In the San Jacinto Region, data available for flood recovery was considerably more limited than for preparedness and response.

  • No county in the San Jacinto River Basin offered publicly facing information identifying flood-damage assessment teams.
  • Five of the 11 counties offer publicly available information on the cost of debris removal, procurement records and awarded contracts – usually for federally funded recovery activities.
  • Only Brazoria, Harris and Fort Bend Counties offered housing rehab info.
  • No county offered a publicly available database for aid distribution, which is often handled through disaster relief agencies such as the Red Cross.
  • Buyouts reduce the threat of repetitive flood losses, but due to the sensitivity of such programs, public information is limited. That limits the ability to assess the extent and success of such programs across the state.
  • All counties maintain disaster event records. They usually live on the county website of within Hazard Mitigation Plans.

Get Involved

The SJRFPG sees “a significant gap in centralized and transparent reporting of recovery resources.” That makes comprehensive regional recover assessments challenging.” That gaps do not necessarily indicated a lack of capability, but rather reflect limitations in publicly accessible documentation. And that could affect your family’s safety.

Community input remains a critical component in shaping a more resilient future for the San Jacinto region. However, the group no longer offers the ability to attend its meetings online due to recurring technical problems. So monitor their website closely for upcoming meetings/locations/agendas.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/30/2026

3319 Days since Harvey

Remnants of Hurricane Polo Bringing Heavy Rains to Texas

9/29/26 – The remnants of Pacific Hurricane Polo will bring heavy rain to Texas in the next four days and produce a slight-to-moderate risk of flash flooding. The heaviest rainfall will likely focus on areas to the west of Houston. However, Houston area residents should remain alert for changes in the forecast.

Current Location and Conditions

Earlier today, Polo made landfall in western Mexico in Sonora.

National Weather Service predicts Polo will dump 4-6 inches of rain across a broad area in southwest Mexico.

The National Hurricane Center says that heavy rainfall associated with Polo will impact the southern and central portions of Sonora today. This rainfall will likely produce life-threatening flooding and mudslides, especially in areas of steep terrain.

Moisture from Polo will support heavy rainfall and flooding potential across the Southwest U.S. into the Southern High Plains today into early Wednesday.

Multiple news reports tonight warned of flash flooding and a possible dam failure in New Mexico that has already prompted evacuations.

Forecast

While the storm is currently headed more toward New Mexico and far west Texas, forecasters predict it will angle towards central Texas in coming days and combine with an area of low pressure predicted to form in the Gulf later this week.

Pivotal Weather shows a wide swath of 5-6 inches of rainfall across areas west of Houston in the next 5 days. Some areas could experience intense rainfall at high hourly rates that produces flash flooding.

The Houston/Galveston office of the National Weather Service predicts the probability of excessive rainfall leading to flash flooding in the Houston area in the next three days is marginal (at least 5%) to slight (at least 15%).

Four days from now, they show the Houston area in the marginal category. All of the “slight risk” has shifted west toward San Antonio.

Much Needed Rainfall

Jeff Lindner, Harris County’s meteorologist, says the rain should hit this area later this week and possibly into the weekend. He also characterized it as “much needed.”

The U.S. Drought Monitor currently shows much of the Houston area as abnormally dry with parts of the region slipping into moderate drought.

As Polo moves inland, it will pull tropical moisture off the western Gulf which will combine with a mid- and high-level moisture from the Pacific.

Lindner says that a second tropical system (Rachel) forming off the southwest coast of Mexico will also shed moisture into a trough forming over the southern plains late this week and this weekend. See this revealing IR Satellite Loop for Atlantic/EPAC Combo on Tropical Tidbits.

Lindner predicts a swath of very heavy to excessive rainfall from generally near or west of the I-35 corridor. Rainfall rates of several inches per hour may induce rapid onset flash flooding in this area even with very dry ground conditions and dry creeks/rivers. 

“Locally, moisture from the Gulf will help produce scattered showers and thunderstorms as early as Wednesday with increasing chances into late week.”

Jeff Lindner, Harris County Meteorologist

Lindner also worries that steering currents over central Texas could force the axis of heavier rains closer or into our area, where a low pressure trough expected to form off our coast this weekend may result in another rainfall maximum near and offshore.

Any flood potential with  the current forecasted amounts would be street flooding, according to Lindner.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/29/2026

3318 Days since Hurricane Harvey

GLO Grants Harris County 1-Year Deadline Extension on All Harvey Grants

9/28/26 – This morning, Dr. Dawn Buckingham, Texas General Land Office (GLO) Commissioner, announced a one-year deadline extension to finish projects that use Community Development Block Grant Funds for Disaster Recovery and Mitigation (CDBG-DR and -MIT) from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD).

The GLO administers HUD grants in Texas. And the Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) was in danger of losing hundreds of millions of dollars because of delays on CDBG-DR projects, which had a rapidly approaching February 28, 2027, deadline.

Potential Loss of Funding Led to Shake-up at HCFCD

Because of those delays, former HCFCD executive director Dr. Tina Petersen resigned under pressure after the June 11, 2026, Harris County Commissioners Court Meeting. At that meeting, Commissioners discussed her continued employment in executive session.

Commissioners then appointed a new HCFCD executive director, Marcus Stuckett on 6/25/26 to replace Petersen. Stuckett previously worked at HCFCD as Director of Engineering. So, he was familiar with projects in the 2018 flood bond. And ever since, he has reportedly been scrambling to accelerate CDBG work, so he can bill as much as possible and minimize or eliminate the potential loss of funds.

The HUD/GLO extension will help Stuckett complete projects without resorting to a complicated billing plan hatched by his predecessor.

Ditching a Complicated “Swap Billing” Plan

Petersen’s plan involved applying CDBG monies for completed Mitigation projects to meet CDBG-DR billing requirements, and thereby minimize the loss of funding.

However, putting everything in one big, billing bucket and swapping funds between programs created a compliance-tracking nightmare. The extension will let HCFCD finish projects and let GLO close out them out in a more orderly manner. The plan to “swap” billing is now dead.

Harris County must now finish the projects according to the original, contractual plan.

No More Extensions

The deadline extension also comes with a warning to Harris County. No more extensions will be forthcoming. A GLO spokesperson emphasized, “People MUST cross the finish line with these projects before the deadline. There will be NO MORE EXTENSIONS.”

The extension also requires sub-recipients such as HCFCD with multiple projects to document the need for a deadline extension on each.

“Failure to comply with all regulations and deadlines can result in remaining funding being withheld. It could also result in expended funding being recaptured.”

GLO Press Release

HUD approved this deadline extension based on the GLO’s strong track record of managing DR funds.

This one-time extension will apply to more than $1.1 billion in disaster recovery and mitigation project funding allocated to Harris County, but…

Buckingham’s Warning to Harris County: “Grave Concerns”

Commissioner Buckingham wrote a strongly worded letter to Harris County Judge Lina Hidalgo and County Commissioners expressing grave concerns she had about the County’s performance with CDBG funds dating back to 2021.

“As I’ve said before, Harris County needs shovels, not scapegoats.”

GLO Commissioner Dawn Buckingham in letter to Harris County Officials

Separately, in a video released today, Buckingham said, “The GLO has committed millions of our own agency funds, along with nearly a thousand meetings and countless hours of staff time to support the Harris County Flood Control District.

Buckingham Video about deadline extension, directly addressing Harris County

“Flood Control proposed a complicated and administratively burdensome plan in May. The GLO has done everything in our power to make this plan work. Unfortunately, more than four months later, Harris County has failed to provide the information necessary for HUD’s approval and almost no additional progress has been made on these time sensitive projects. 

“With the additional year now available, the projects will proceed under their original proposals using the disaster recovery funds I allocated to Harris County more than three years ago.

“The county now has one additional year to complete the projects, I pray the projects get completed, because if they do not the Harris County flood victims are the ones who suffer. If Harris County fails to meet the new benchmarks, the GLO will be forced to swiftly reallocate the unused balance to shovel-ready projects. Our priority will remain benefiting Harris County residents.”

Extension Requirements

This deadline extension applies to all CDBG programs in all parts of the state. Here’s how it affects three Harris County programs.

Harris County Housing & Community Development CDBG-MIT

From August 31, 2027, to August 31, 2028.

Harris County Flood Control District CDBG-MIT

From March 31, 2028, to March 31, 2029.

Harris County Flood Control District CDBG-DR

From February 28, 2027, to February 28, 2028.

The deadline extension will also be available for existing 2017 Hurricane Harvey Local Buyout and Acquisition Program contracts as well as existing mitigation contracts (2015, 2016, 2017, and 2018 funded).

The County will need to submit requests documenting the need for more time and that the additional time will be sufficient to complete the projects. To remain compliant with federal regulations, timelines, and the terms of the GLO’s grant agreement with HUD.

The extension also does not include additional administrative funding. Nor does it allow the addition of “new work.” Adding to project scope will not be allowed when the funding was awarded through a competitive process as it changes the application under which it was scored and awarded.

For More Information

To learn more about the GLO’s disaster recovery and mitigation grants, visit recovery.texas.gov.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/28/2027

3317 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

As Harris County Increases Taxes, Spending Remains a Mystery

9/27/26 – Harris County just passed the largest tax increase in its history. But it provides very little transparency in how it spends taxpayer money. For example, try digging into how the county spends money from its 2022 Bond Program.

What Voters Approved in 2022

In November 2022, voters approved Harris County Engineering’s three-part $1.2 billion bond program. It included:

PropositionPurposeAuthorized
APublic Safety Facilities$100 million
BRoads, Bridges, Transportation$900 million
CParks and Trails$200 million
Total$1.200 billion

No Spending Data on Engineering Department Website

Yet, I can find no discussion of bond expenditures on the Engineering Department’s website. It contains only one mention of dollars “committed” (see below). ALTOGETHER, the county has so far committed $242 million. But Engineering doesn’t tell us what for.

Screen capture from Harris County Engineering Website on 9/27/26

After four years, Engineering’s website shows NO:

  • Breakdowns of spending among Public Safety, Roads and Parks
  • Project lists
  • Spending by precinct
  • Explanation for the sudden drop-off in spending for 2026.

I had to look elsewhere, without much luck, for that information.

The County’s Universal Services Department contains a dashboard that includes Engineering expenses for FY2025. But I couldn’t find one for the current fiscal year.

And the County’s Office of Management and Budget’s (OMB) “Open Budget Dashboard” hasn’t worked for months.

No data loads for any of the categories/groups nested on left.

The hunt was on. A 2023 presentation on the 2022 Bond by Dr. Milton Rahman, the County Engineer, showed that within the $900 million dollars designated for Roads, Bridges and Transportation, six sub-categories existed:

  • $200 million for neighborhood drainage
  • $100 million for Road Rehabilitation
  • $50 million for Multimodal Transportation
  • $50 million for Vision Zero
  • $200 million for Partnership Opportunities
  • $300 million for General Road improvements.

Falling into an Information Black Hole

So, what did that money buy and where? That’s even harder to determine. Of the $242 million supposedly “committed” to date from the 2022 Bond, I could find no detailed information on money actually spent. However, I did find high-level information in the County’s 531-page Proposed FY2027 budget about totals “encumbered” in the three main categories. Encumbered means purchase orders have been issued for projects; it does not mean work has been paid for.

The Proposed 2027 budget says that:

  • All of the $100 million in the Public Safety portion of the 2022 bond has been committed to eight projects (see page 81). But the budget provides no further breakdown.
  • Approximately a third of the 2022 Park bonds have been issued or encumbered, but we don’t know where or for what.
  • $45.3 million (5%) of the $900 million in Road bonds has been encumbered, leaving approximately $855 million remaining. NO bonds have been issued yet in this category, which includes $200 million for Drainage Improvements.
Page 51 of 2027 Budget. See lines 2 and 4.

And yet earlier this month, the Engineering Department indicated that it had no money identified for projects in its Master Drainage Plan and that it would likely have to pass a new bond to pay for them.

So, it would seem that Harris County is about to ask for more bond money to improve Road Drainage when it has only encumbered 5% ($45.3 million) of the money approved in 2022 for Road Bonds.

The budget contains no breakdown showing how much each of the six subcategories has received from Road Bonds to date. But even if all of the $45.3 million went to Drainage Improvements, the percentage encumbered to date would still only amount to 22.7% ($45.3 out of $200 million).

So where is all the money going? Why does Harris County need more?

In fairness, many drainage projects started to date may still be in the engineering phase. Construction comes last and is usually the most expensive phase of a project’s lifecycle. So the percentages cited above may climb.

Perpetual Tax Increases Thrive in Perpetual Darkness

But the point is that perpetual tax increases thrive in perpetual darkness.

I’m not implying fraud. But…

The absence of reliable information makes informed debate impossible. It also makes results impossible to track and accountability impossible to determine.

Harris County Engineering:

  • Provides no or little insight into how it spends taxpayer money
  • May soon request another bond approval when it apparently has spent only a small portion of the last bond.

Against that backdrop, Harris County property taxes are going up by 7.6% next year – the largest increase in history.

For the record, Dr. Milton Rahman, executive director of Harris County Engineering, used to be Precinct 2 Commissioner Adrian Garcia’s head engineer. Garcia voted FOR the massive tax increase and also proposed the 2022 Bond.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/27/26

3316 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Harris County Engineering Developing Drainage Master Plan

9/25/26 – At the 9/22/26 Meeting of the Harris County Community Flood Resilience Task Force, Harris County Engineering discussed its effort to develop a drainage master plan for the county. The presentation discussed the project’s purpose, the team’s organization, regions within the county, the process, next steps and a public viewer.

Here is the presentation by Steve Albert with the engineering firm DCCM. Drainage and water resource engineering are among their core specialties. And Albert acts as a consultant on the Drainage Master Plan, which he said is a little more than halfway complete.

Focusing on Unincorporated Harris County Neighborhoods

The plan will recommend neighborhood flood reduction projects in unincorporated Harris County areas not covered by previous or ongoing drainage projects. That includes roughly two-thirds of the county’s approximately 1,800 square miles.

Responsibilities

The Office of the County Engineer under Dr. Milton Rahman leads the effort. DCCM serves as program manager over four vendors that each cover about a quarter of the county: AECOM (Region 1, northwest), Michael Baker International (Region 2, south), HR Green (central), and LAN (east). A $12.5 million Texas General Land Office (GLO) grant originally funded the project.

Project Phases

The project has six phases and is currently in the prioritization phase.

Data collection includes flood claims and predicted flooding from the County’s new MAAPnext modeling. Mr. Albert noted that Precinct 3 contains a large share of the unincorporated area and is therefore likely to have more projects.

Focus on Neighborhood Drainage, Street Flooding, Mobility Impacts 

While Harris County Flood Control focuses on bayous, Engineering focuses on getting water to them.

Mr. Albert explained the plan focuses on smaller, more frequent storm events and neighborhoods whose local drainage systems cannot convey water to the bayous, since many communities experience flooding well outside formal floodplain boundaries. Street flooding and mobility impacts are a key concern. 

Equal Distribution of Projects Throughout County

So far, 200 project areas have been identified (50 per region). Each has a focus-area data sheet describing location, watershed, estimated cost, and expected benefits.

Of those, 60 projects (15 per region) will undergo enhanced modeling to develop realistic project costs. Enhanced modeling is expected to be complete in January 2027, with the final report issued before March 2027 for Commissioners Court approval. 

Project Online Viewer

Mr. Albert demonstrated the project’s public online viewer. It includes:

  • Layers for the four regions
  • The 200 identified project areas
  • Watershed boundaries
  • The Harris County channel system
  • Current effective FEMA floodplains (with the current 500-year floodplain serving as a proxy for the future 100-year floodplain)
  • HCFCD detention basins
  • Municipal utility districts (MUDs)
  • Government facilities
  • An address search function.

He walked through how users can add comments directly to the map. The viewer will remain open for comments through approximately the end of October. 

Welcome screen from online public viewer

The hexagons shown on the map do not represent projects. Mr. Albert explained they represent roughly 200-acre units used to score flood potential. The 200 displayed represent the highest-scoring areas in the county. Note the large cluster in Atascocita.

Mr. Albert explained that projects are sized by local drainage area and may span several hexagons.

No Funding Identified Yet

Projects will generally range from $1–20 million and target more frequent (1- to 2-year) storm events. 

There is currently no funding for any of the projects identified to date. However, a future bond program has been discussed. (See Page 5 of meeting minutes.)

The intent of the drainage plan is to give precincts an engineering-based list from which to select projects. It will be based on:

  • Local knowledge and priorities
  • Ability of projects to reduce flooded homes
  • Flooded roadway length

What Types of Comments Can Residents Submit?

Mr. Albert said comments can be as simple as reporting backyard or street flooding from a small rain event. Or they might identify specific intersections or routes that become impassable. 

To see video of his presentation go to the Harris County Community Flood Resilience Task Force website. The meeting lasted two hours. Mr. Albert’s presentation starts at 31 minutes.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/25/26

3314 Days since Hurricane Harvey

TIRZ Provides Northpark Update at Kingwood Town Hall

9/24/26 – At Houston City Council Member Fred Flickinger’s town hall meeting in Kingwood on 9/22/26, Tom Broad, the chair of the Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ 10 Board, gave an update on the progress of its Northpark expansion project including its purpose, timeline and the project’s next phases.

Tom Broad, Chair of Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ 10 speaking to town hall meeting about Northpark expansion

Phase One Now 75% Complete

Broad characterized Phase One (US59 to Russel Palmer) as 75% complete. “We ought to be substantially complete with that phase by the end of the first quarter of 2027,” he said.

“This first project has been a long time coming,” Broad continued, “considering that the magnitude of what we were asked to do – construct an all-weather evacuation route out of Kingwood that doesn’t flood.”

He added, “I will give you an example of the difficulty. It took us two years and 11 months to construct a storm sewer drainage system that meets federal standards and that will prevent flooding along North Park. This is something that Kingwood residents have requested for years – an evacuation route out of Kingwood.“

Other major routes out of Kingwood, such as Kingwood Drive, Hamblen, West Lake Houston Parkway Woodland Hills and Mills Branch can flood during high-water events. During Harvey, many people became trapped by rising floodwaters. Below are several ReduceFlooding.com file photos.

4000 Students at Kingwood High School
Looking west at Kingwood High School and Kingwood Drive (left) during Harvey.
Evacuation Route during Harvey
Photo by Jim Balcom of Hamblen Road during Harvey evacuation
Harvey evacuation. Sally Geiss
Rescue boats evacuating people along West Lake Houston Parkway at Kingwood Town Center during Harvey
Photo by Kilee Northrup. Looking south down Woodland Hills Drive, south of Kingwood Dr. toward Deer Ridge Park and stables. Taken on Wednesday August 30, late afternoon, "once I was able to drive out of my village (Miulls Branch). Horses OK."
Photo by Kilee Northrup. Looking south down Woodland Hills Drive, south of Kingwood Dr. toward Deer Ridge Park and stables. Taken on Wednesday August 30, 2017.

Need to Finish Detention Basins First to Compensate for Additional Impervious Cover

Broad explained why the project started at US59 and is moving east. “We needed to complete that part of the project first because our bridge over the railroad tracks at Loop 494 is essentially six additional lanes of impervious cover. We couldn’t build that bridge until we had a place for all the water to go,” he said referring to multiple drainage improvements.

Stormwater management became a major challenge. “We even had to install stormwater pipes under the railroad tracks. That was a life experience! But we got it done, and we are moving into the exciting phase of constructing the bridge.”

Complexity of Drilling 90-Foot Deep Piers in Middle of Major Traffic

That has proven tricky, according to Broad. “Council Member Flickinger has committed to keeping two lanes of Northpark open in both directions at all times,” he said. “But we still need enough area for a construction zone for the contractor.”

“That’s not easy to do. You’ve noticed that the intersection of Loop 494 and Northpark has still not been opened. Our contractor needs that area to build the bridge columns.”

“These bridge columns have very deep underground piers. We had to drill 90 feet below ground. Once those bridge columns are secured, we can open the intersection. Soon, we will begin constructing the bridge columns and the caps that go on top of the columns that support the bridge beams,” he said.

Northpark bridge supports under construction
Caps over 90-foot deep piers now under construction

“In October, we expect to start hanging bridge beams,” said Broad. “We will also begin installing street lights on top of the bridge and begin painting the bridge. That activity, of course, will trigger closing lanes as well. But by November, most of the major construction should be completed…” Then he quickly added, “…at least everything east of the new bridge. We’ll have a six lane roadway with sidewalks and street lights for the first time.”

Street Lights Scheduled by Thanksgiving

Broad says that the new street lights won’t be turned on until Thanksgiving. “There are three circuits. The first one on the east side of Russell Palmer, will be illuminated first. Then the middle section closer to King’s Mill goes on second. And the third circuit on the bridges will have to wait until the bridge is constructed.”

Phase 2 and Detention Basin South of St. Martha

Phase Two of the Northpark Expansion goes from Russell Palmer eastward to Woodland Hills. “We are at the 30% design benchmark for Phase Two,” said Broad. “And this fall we will begin acquiring the right of way.”

In concluding his remarks, Broad said, “We’ve created something new for our budget this year. This is the Regional Detention Basin Project. It will be located where Bens Branch and the Kingwood Diversion Ditch meet. This basin when complete will hold approximately 90 acre feet of water, which will help reduce downstream flooding on both the Diversion Ditch and Bens Branch.”

Thirteen people died along Ben’s Branch as a result of flooding during Harvey.

For More Information

To learn more about the project, Broad referred the audience to Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority project pages. “You can see plans for Phase One, Phase Two and the Detention Basin as well as a three-week lookahead schedule,” he said.

He also invited the public to visit board meetings at the Kingwood Community Center at 8 AM, nine months a year. Usually, they’re second Thursdays, but this month, the meeting is today (the fourth Thursday). So, check the website for exact days.

Can’t attend but still have questions? Email info@lakehousonra.com.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/24/26

3313 Days since Hurricane Harvey

 

Lake Houston Gates Update

9/23/26 – Houston City Council Member Fred Flickinger’s October 2026 town hall meeting featured three speakers on the project to add more floodgates to the Lake Houston dam.

Coastal Water Authority (CWA) Board Member and former State Representative Dan Huberty introduced the topic and two other speakers:

The Need

In his opening remarks, Huberty emphasized the critical need to make sure that installation of new gates didn’t put the existing dam at risk because of the critical role it plays in providing water to millions of people of the region.

Olinger began his portion of the presentation with Hurricane Harvey statistics that demonstrated the scale of the challenge. Harvey became the flood of record for the Houston region.

Olinger said that 2.6 million acre feet of water flowed over the dam during Harvey. That translates to 847 billion gallons…enough water to refill the lake 19 times. And enough to supply all 7.7 million people in the entire Houston region for 5.5 years.

At the peak, 491,000 cubic feet per second (CFS) flowed over the dam. That’s enough, he said, “to fill an empty Lake Houston 19 times.”

He also said that, at the peak rate, the empty lake could refill in 3.3 hours.

The highest water surface elevation during the flood was 53.1 feet…more than. 10 feet above the normal pool level.

The Plan

Next, Olinger described the current release capacity of Lake Houston and plans to increase it. To the east (right) of the 3,100 foot long Ambursen spillway are four small gates that can help lower the lake level.

Those gates can currently release water at about 10,000 cubic feet per second. That’s one fifteenth the release rate of Lake Conroe.

So, Black & Veatch is examining ways to increase that rate. Originally, the plan was to modify the spillway. But that was too risky because of the 75-year-old concrete. So now, the plan is to modify the earthen, eastern portion of the dam at the location shown below (yellow box) approximately 500 feet east of the spillway.

Proposed New Gates

Mueller began his portion of the presentation by talking about objectives and design constraints.

Engineers had to reduce upstream flood risk without increasing downstream risk.

He said, “That got us to what is an 11-gate structure that has the ability to release – in a controlled manner – about up to 84,000 cubic feet per second from Lake Houston. That is roughly eight times the current capability of the existing gates.”

Mueller also described an “approach channel” on the reservoir side that allows water to fill in behind the new gates and a “discharge channel” on the downstream side that will dissipate energy during the release. 

Eighty-four thousand cubic feet per second exceeds the release rate from Lake Conroe during Harvey, which was 79,000 cubic feet per second. The gates can be used to lower the lake in advance of or during storms to offset inflows from the East and West Forks.

The recommended structure consists of reinforced concrete piers with 11 steel gates mounted on radial arms. It also contains a bridge on top of the structure for operations and maintenance.

Flood-Risk Reduction Benefits of New Gates

Mueller said the design should reduce the height of flooding by 1.8 feet during both a 100-year storm and a repeat of Harvey. And that should be enough to reduce the number of structures flooded by +/- 20% in each scenario.

Secondary Benefit of New Gates

The existing Lake Houston dam dates back to the early 1950s. Mueller said that the new gates will also provide flexibility to the CWA and City when it comes to future repairs of the dam.

“It’s in need of more or less constant repair and or rehabilitation,” said Mueller. “The gate project gives Coastal Water Authority the ability to divert flows around … work on the concrete structure.”

Mueller added that the gates will also help divert water around work when CWA eventually replaces the dam.

Cost of Project and Funding Gap

Black & Veatch now estimates the cost of construction at $315 million. That’s $41 million more than the estimate from January 2026 ($274 million).

To date, $120 million in funding has been committed. Of that, $80 million comes from the State legislature. Plus, the City and Harris County Flood Control have each pledged $20 million.

That leaves a funding gap of $195 million. Where will the additional money come from? According to Olinger, the current proposed plan may or may not qualify for FEMA aid. The uncertainty has to do with the benefit/cost ratio that FEMA demands and whether the project benefits can meet FEMA’s threshold.

Olinger said that CWA is working closely with the City’s Government Relations Group and Representative Cunningham to fill the gap.

Current Projected Timeline

In addition to the cost growing over time with changes in project scope, the timeline has slipped. Assuming funding can be found, and the Army Corps grants a permit, construction could start in 2028 and finish in 2030, four years from now.

Can It Be Done?

Huberty, a former state legislator, closed the presentation on an optimistic note. He said, “We’ve got the smartest people on the project. I’ve got the support of the Mayor, support of the City Council. Support of our legislative body. And certainly in conversations that we’ve had with the Governor’s office, Lieutenant Governor’s office, and Speaker’s office.”

He continued, “They’re well aware of where we’re at in our planning. They’re well aware of where we are at in our requirements. We have had multiple conversations. We just need to execute upon this strategy.”

In explaining why the project has taken so long, he said, “You can’t ask for what you don’t know you need. Now we know where we’re at. And we’re very bullish as we go forward in executing on the project.”

Huberty also implied that NOT using FEMA funds might get the project done faster.

The next legislative session will definitely be important for the Lake Houston Area.

Click here to download a high-resolution PDF of the entire presentation.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/23/26

3312 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Cunningham, Flickinger Address Funding as Dredging District Board Gets Down to Business

9/21/2026 – The Lake Houston Dredging District Board, with the assistance of State Rep. Charles Cunningham and Houston District E City Council Member Fred Flickinger are getting down to business. One month after their first public organizing meeting, the Board has split up into committees, met with dozens of experts, outlined a business plan, explored funding, mapped out next steps and started to prioritize them.

Locking Down Decisions that Will Determine Funding Needs

However, no one is dredging yet. And everyone wishes that could happen sooner rather than later. But still, the Board is far ahead of where they were at this time last month. And within the next month or two, they should be able to start making decisions that will shape the future of district.

Until now, the Board has been gathering information it needs to make those decisions.

  • Where are the sediment accumulations?
  • How much needs to be removed?
  • How will they separate sand from silt?
  • How much will that cost?
  • Where will the sediment be sold?
  • How will it be sold?
  • How much will it sell for?
  • How much will it cost to transport?
  • Should they outsource operations?
  • Who will staff the organization?
  • Who will keep the books and offer legal services?
  • How much can sales offset operating costs?
  • How much will they need in appropriations?
  • Who will file for the federal tax ID required to open a bank account?
  • Where will they bank?
  • Should they adjust their fiscal year to coincide with the state’s appropriation cycle?
  • Etc.

If you’ve never started a business before, it’s hard to appreciate the complexities. It feels as though everything needs to be done yesterday.

January Deadline Driving Funding Request

The meeting today lasted two hours. The discussion was lively.

State Rep. Charles Cunningham outlined the legislative process for funding.

Cunningham emphasized that he needed a cost estimate for any legislative funding request by January 14, 2027, at the latest. He also requested the numbers earlier if possible, so that “we can start working on the rider.”

It will likely take until September 2027 before any state appropriation becomes final. It would then take another month or two for money to work its way from the State Treasury to the Texas Water Development Board and back to the Dredging District.

Flickinger then offered to provide start-up seed money from his City Council District service funds. And Cunningham admonished, “We can’t let grass grow under our feet.”

Members of the Board’s Dredging Committee, Bill Simpson (background and Derek St. John (right) conversing with Cunningham about funding.

The Big Question: What Percent of Costs Can Be Offset?

Long term, it would behoove everyone to get the Dredging District as close to break even as financially possible.

A web search for dredging case studies where the beneficial sale of spoils totally offset operational costs came up empty.

However, I did find several where sales offset a large percentage of the costs. So getting the right answers to the litany of questions above is vital. It will determine the long-term sustainability of dredging operations on Lake Houston. And that could reduce flood risk and save lives.

Lake Houston Dredging and Maintenance District’s logo adopted today. Design by Board Member Kathleen Todd Jordan.

Next Meeting

The Dredging District meets every third Monday at 11 AM, at the offices of Partnership Lake Houston. So, mark October 19th on your calendar. The address is 110 W Main St, Humble, TX 77338.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/21/2026

3310 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Dr. Anna Weiss Becomes New Head of Bayou Land Conservancy

9/19/26 – On September 1, 2026, Dr. Anna Weiss became the new executive director of the Bayou Land Conservancy (BLC), one of the leading conservation groups in the Houston region. Dr. Weiss replaces Jill Boullion who retired after leading BLC for ten years. I interviewed Dr. Weiss about her background and priorities.

BLC’s primary focus is on the Lake Houston watershed which covers approximately 2500 square miles to the west, north, and east of the lake, which provides drinking water for more than 2.2 million people. BLC is nationally accredited and preserves land along streams for flood control, clean water, and wildlife.

Dr. Anna Weiss outside BLC headquarters in the Woodlands

PhD in Environmental Science from UT

Rehak: You earned your PhD in environmental science from UT. What attracted you to that field?

Weiss: I’ve always really loved nature. I grew up on a barrier island in New York, right outside of New York City. So, I spent a lot of time outside as a kid. Eventually, when I went to university, I studied anthropology. I was really curious about how and why humans are the way we are. And how climate and evolution intersect. At that time, I was doing a lot of field work in Kenya. 

And then, in my senior year, Superstorm Sandy hit my hometown. That really made it clear that climate change is not just something happening far away. It’s affecting us. And it really made me want to do something about it. 

So, I thought about the best way to make a difference. And eventually I decided to get a PhD and learn the science.

I studied geosciences at UT Austin to understand how climate impacted ecosystems and environments in the past. Now I’m applying that learning to what’s happening today. How can we preserve and protect our ecosystems? 

Rehak: After UT, you went back to New York?

Weiss: Yes, but before that, I went to Belize. I did a postdoctoral fellowship at the University of Belize Environmental Research Institute and applied my research to modern ecosystems. I became a professor there and continued my research. Then I went back to New York and started working with a conservation and restoration organization in New York City.

Work at Green Galveston Initiatives

Rehak: But most recently, you worked in Galveston.

Weiss: I was the director of Green Galveston Initiatives. Galveston reminded me a lot of the little barrier island I grew up on. And it had a lot of the same issues with hurricanes, flooding, and development.

You know, a lot of developers want to build skyscrapers on the beach. But that leads to all sorts of issues. So, I got to do some really exciting work there working on parks – city-owned parks that were just flooding constantly. One was Jones Park. We actually called it Jones Pond because it would just sprinkle and the thing would fill up with water. The other one was Shield Park and this was a park that was just covered in concrete and there was contamination beneath it. So, we couldn’t actually plant trees or anything to help with the heat and shade. 

I worked with the city, engineers, architects and the community to make sure that these parks were not only going to help with the flooding and heat mitigation, but that they would also provide social and economic benefits for neighborhoods.

Spearheading Partnerships to Achieve Results

Those were two exciting capital projects. Another evolved organically. We found many organizations on the island were aligned. But they were not necessarily talking to each other. We had little pockets of groups doing great work. But they could be so much stronger working together and with the City of Galveston. 

Galveston’s comprehensive plan was 15 years old; it was created after Ike. If we wanted to really change the way development was happening, we had to start with the local comprehensive plan, because land development regulations and ordinances evolve from that. The Planning Commission relies on it to say yes or no to a developer. 

So, we put together a group of more than 30 partner organizations to find consensus on a comprehensive plan. Fifteen years later, we were able to analyze the past plan, find where the issues were, and start thinking about how other cities managed those issues? 

Rehak: It sounds a lot like what we need up here.

Weiss: Montgomery County is one of the fastest developing counties in America. 

So, it’s really important that we think about our land use and our natural resources. People need places to live. But their quality of life, health, and safety are also important.

Rehak: You don’t want to see homes flood repeatedly and create conditions that lead to future slums.

Weiss: Exactly.

Making Land Conservation Easier, Raising Awareness

Rehak: What are your priorities as BLC’s new leader ?

Weiss: My first priority is just to learn and listen. This organization has been around for 30 years and has been doing amazing work in a huge footprint. I’ve been here two weeks. So, priority number one is listening and learning. 

I’m also very interested in how policies are affecting the kind of work that we can do as environmentalists. What are the levers of policy and the levers of change that we need at the local, state, and even federal levels? What do we need to do to make land preservation and conservation easier, more common? I’m digging into that side of things. 

It’s also important for people to understand who we are and why we’re doing what we do. Many people look at land conservation as something that rich people do … to get tax breaks. 

But that land also reduces flooding, cleans water, and preserves biodiversity. We need to make sure that everybody from all walks of life knows what we do, why, and how it can help them. So, there’s an educational priority.

We need to show people how nature-based solutions like bioswales can turn the ground into a sponge and absorb water so that we have less flooding and less pollution.

Rehak: Any other priorities?

Weiss: Those are the big ones. 

Importance of Preserving Scarborough Property

Rehak: Let’s discuss a specific example. What would you like to see done with the Scarborough property?

Weiss: Great question. I will preface this by saying I’ve only been here a couple of weeks. But from what I’ve learned, that property is really important in protecting everyone downstream from flooding. If we develop that irresponsibly, it could become a huge problem, not just for the environment, but for people, the economy, and social cohesion. Flooding devastates all of those things. 

I would love to see that land conserved, so that it can do what it’s supposed to do – absorb water.

Rehak: How do we preserve it?

Weiss: There are developers with deep pockets and political connections. That makes it difficult. But there are also a lot of concerned people. And our power is with people. I hope we can put enough pressure on the developers and policy makers to change their minds.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/19/2026

3308 Days since Hurricane Harvey