Royal Pines or Vanishing Woods?

On paper, it appears to be called Royal Pines. On foot, it appears that a more appropriate name would be Vanishing Woods.

Live in a place long enough and you are bound to lose some of the things that attracted you to that area. Today, I discovered contractors clearing land for another new development in Montgomery County. It’s at the north end of West Lake Houston Parkway in Porter, just west of Country Colony. See red oval below.

Contractors are clearing land in the red oval.

In White Oak Creek Watershed

I do not yet have any firm details about the size of the new development or the number of homes. But White Oak Creek will cut just north and east of it.

New development sits in middle of map south of White Oak Creek. White Oak joins Caney Creek (right) and then the East Fork (out of frame, farther right).

Layer After Layer of Ownership

The developer has not yet posted any signs at the entrance to the development. However…

Montgomery County Appraisal District shows that a limited partnership named TC LB Royal Pines LP owns 150 acres at this location.

Royal Pines bought the land from the 1992 Guniganti Credit Shelter Trusts on 12/9/21. The Guniganti family owns the Triple PG sand mine east of the area being cleared.

From Montgomery County Appraisal District Web Site.

The Texas Secretary of State shows that the purchaser of the land registered its partnership just two days before the sale. TC LB GP, Inc. in Vancouver, British Columbia, is the general partner of the limited partnership. The general partner is registered in Delaware. However, the MoCo Appraisal District lists the mailing address for tax bills at 8655 S. PRIEST DR., TEMPE, AZ 85284-1903. Google Maps shows a company named Coronado West at that address. The relationship between Coronado West and TC LB Royal Pines LP remains unclear.

The Houston Business Journal ran a story in February about Royal Pines. It said that Ashton Woods Homes (a Starlight Homes subsidiary which targets first-time home buyers), plans to build 350 to 450 homes in the area.

Photos Taken 4/24/22

Contractors have cleared only a small portion of the property to date.

Looking SE toward the northern end of West Lake Houston Parkway, Country Colony, and Royal Brook. A sliver of the Triple PG mine appears in the upper left.
Looking east toward WLHP, Country Colony and the Triple PG mine.
Without plans, it’s impossible to tell how many trees the developer plans to retain.
Some not so royal pines stacked at entrance at north end of West Lake Houston Parkway.

Eyeballing the cleared area, I estimate that contractors have only cleared about about 10-20% of the 150 acres to date. Stay tuned for more news as it becomes available.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/24/22

1699 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Silty Detention Pond Flushed into Bens Branch

Contractors at the controversial mini rent home development called the Preserve at Woodridge Forest flushed a silt-laden detention pond into a stormwater channel leading to Bens Branch this week. The silty water migrated at least two miles downstream. The pictures below show the trail of silt.

On 4/17/22, Easter Sunday, I photographed a full pond and noticed a pump in the upper right (southeast) corner of the pond.

Looking east over Preserve at Woodridge Forest detention pond on Easter Sunday. Note pump in upper right and pond level.

Three days later, the pump was still going and the pond was nearly empty.

Pump still working on Wednesday.

The ditch between the Preserve and Kingwood Park High School was filled with identically colored water.

Color of water in ditch matches color of water in pond. Note pile of silt in ditch below pump hose in lower left.
Looking north past pump and the near-empty detention pond.
Equipment apparently cleared paths for northern end of pond to drain toward pump.

Where did all the silty water go?

Bens Branch south of Northpark Drive.
One block downstream, Bens Branch at Woodland Hills Drive.
Bens Branch at Tree Lane approximately 2 miles south of construction site. Resident Chris Bloch followed the pollution even farther downstream.

Fish Story

As I photographed the silty water above going down Bens Branch, two young boys with fishing poles came up to me. They looked at the water in disbelief and then looked at me quizzically. “Do you think it’s safe?” they asked.

“Hard to tell,” I said. “It’s runoff from a construction site upstream.”

They left without even dropping a hook into the water or saying a word. Smart kids.

Dangers of Sediment Pollution

The EPA published this brochure that explains some of the dangers of sediment pollution. Among them, it says, “Sediment in stream beds disrupts the natural food chain by destroying the habitat where the smallest stream organisms live and causing massive declines in fish populations. Sediment increases the cost of treating drinking water and can result in odor and taste problems.” Bens Branch empties straight into Lake Houston, the source of drinking water for 2 million people.

Sediment can also clog streams, reducing their carrying capacity. Harris County Flood Control recently cleaned out Bens Branch in a 4-phase project. According to the Kingwood Area Drainage analysis, it had been reduced to a 2-year level of service in places. That means it would flood on a 2-year rain.

No Permit Posted

For these reasons, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality closely monitors construction sites. But the Preserve at Woodridge did not have a TCEQ Construction General Permit posted at the street. This web page seems to indicate they should have one. See Step 5. It says, “Before starting construction, post a copy of the Site Notice at the construction site. Leave the notice posted until construction is completed.”

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/23/22, with thanks to Chris Bloch for alerting me to the story

1698 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Case Finally Closed on Lake Conroe Association Lawsuit against City, SJRA

In April, 2021, a Montgomery County District Court dismissed the Lake Conroe Association’s lawsuit against the City of Houston for its Lake Lowering Policy. In August 2021, the court dismissed the same case against the SJRA with prejudice. The Lake Conroe Association (LCA) and several Lake Conroe residents appealed the decisions.

Then on April 20, 2022, LCA and the other appellants asked that the Court dismiss their appeal. Neither the City, nor SJRA, opposed the motion. Three judges of the Ninth District Court of Appeals in Beaumont then unanimously dismissed the appeal. Case closed.

“Takings” Claim Disputed

Lake Conroe Association contended that the SJRA’s lake lowering policy amounted to a “taking” of residents’ property.

The City of Houston and SJRA contended that the water at issue did not belong to lakefront homeowners. It belonged to the State of Texas and the City. Therefore, the Lake Conroe Association had no basis for a “takings” claim.

Sources close to the process said that before the matter was heard on appeal, the LCA realized it would never win. So its leaders decided to drop the case and avoid more legal fees.

Clearing the Way for Lake-Lowering Policy to Remain in Effect

This clears the way for the SJRA’s seasonal lake lowering policy to remain in effect during construction of additional floodgates on the Lake Houston Dam. The policy helps ensure that extra “storage capacity” (parking space for water) remains in Lake Conroe during the rainiest months in spring and the peak of hurricane season.

This reduces chances of another devastating release that floods downstream residents during a major storm, such as Hurricane Harvey. The SJRA released 79,000 cubic feet per second during Harvey, one third of all the water coming down the West Fork between Humble and Kingwood.

However, as time went by, Lake Conroe residents became upset with the policy. That led to a contentious confrontation between upstream and downstream residents, as well as the lawsuit.

2022 Version of Lake-Lowering Policy is a Compromise

Over time, the SJRA has reduced the amount of lowering in its policy. Currently, the spring lowering is one-half foot below 201 during April and May, the level of the conservation pool in the lake. Originally, it was one full foot below 201. Most people call that the “normal” level. However, the mean level of Lake Conroe is below that about two-thirds of the time. (See last table below.)

Current Lake Conroe Level

Evaporation and low rainfall currently have Lake Conroe at 200.8, or about 3 inches above the new seasonal target level and 3 inches below the conservation pool.

Currently Lake Conroe’s level is at 200.8 feet and the City of Houston (COH) has not called to lower the lake further.

A close reading of the policy reveals that for the lake lowering to begin, the City of Houston must call for the water.

Below-Average Rainfall Has Delayed Need for Spring Release

However, below-average rainfall for the last two months has delayed the need for a spring release from Lake Conroe this year. Much of the state is now in drought.

Montgomery and northern Harris Counties are currently rated as “abnormally dry.” Southern Harris, Fort Bend and Waller Counties all have “moderate drought.”

Jace Houston, general manager of the SJRA, said, “We haven’t had a big rain in a long time and there’s no significant rain in the foreseeable future. The feeling is that evaporation will soon take the lake down to the target level. The City of Houston must initiate the lowering. If we get a lot of rain, we’ll start releasing again.”

Time for Healing

In addition to reducing the spring lake lowering, the 2022 policy lowers Lake Conroe to 200.5 in August and 200 in September – both a half foot higher than the original policy.

Hopefully, this compromise will help upstream and downstream residents live together now that the lawsuit has been dismissed. It’s time for some healing.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/22/2022

1697 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Martin Updates Community on Additional Gates for Lake Houston

Perhaps no flood-mitigation project has generated more interest in the Lake Houston Area recently than the addition of more flood gates to the Lake Houston Dam. In recent months, as engineers worked on the project’s benefit/cost ratio, information about the project became hard to find. That fueled rumors.

But Tuesday night, at the Kingwood Community Center, Mayor Pro Tem Dave Martin put many of those rumors to rest. He denied the project was on hold, reaffirmed the City’s commitment to the project, and outlined the three main issues that engineers are currently grappling with.

Issues Still Being Evaluated

The main issues include:

  • Safety concerns about cutting into the concrete of a dam that’s almost 70 years old.
  • Getting the benefit/cost ratio up.
  • Finding a suitable alternative that significantly reduces flood risk within the budget.

Martin elaborated on each. Regarding:

Safety concerns – He described the risks of cutting into it to install crest gates. Among them, he said engineers worried about structural stability of the dam after construction. Accordingly, they are recommending significant reinforcement of the concrete. He also hinted that contractors might not bid on the project for fear of the potential liability.

Benefit/Cost Ratio – He said that the higher-than-expects costs on of some alternatives drove the BCR down, and that that was driving the exploration of additional alternatives. He did say, however, that FEMA allows including “social benefits” when the BCR is between .75 and 1.0. The inclusion of social benefits still must yield a BCR of 1.0 or greater. On a separate note, a federal employee told me that the Biden administration may change this policy. So significant uncertainty still exists re: calculation of the BCR.

Budget – He implied that some alternatives under consideration became non-starters because of high costs and inflation.

Alternatives Still Under Consideration

So, the search for a suitable alternative that meets all objectives continues. Among the options still in the running, Martin mentioned crest gates on the west side of the dam and adding a tainter gate to the earthen, eastern portion.

Martin shared a timetable that shows construction beginning in November. However, FEMA must approve the benefit/cost ratio before they release construction funds.

Schedule for adding gates to Lake Houston, first shown in July 2021. Also shown on 4/19/2022. Martin emphasized the schedule has not changed, but could.

Background of Project

At the peak of Harvey, 425,000 cubic feet per second (CFS) went over the dam’s spillway. That’s five times the average flow of Niagra Falls. Floodwater backed up so far that it flooded thousands of homes and businesses. It also killed 13 people in the Lake Houston Area, 12 of them in one retirement center.

The release of 80,000 CFS from Lake Conroe contributed almost a fifth of the water going over the spillway. Lake Conroe gates can release 150,000 CFS while Lake Houston’s can release only 10,000 CFS. The disparity in release capacity caused many to ask whether more gates on Lake Houston could reduce flooding.

Martin pointed out that when water gets high enough in Lake Houston, it can escape over a 2,000-foot-wide spillway. However, more gates could play a role in a pre-release strategy.

Pre-releasing water from Lake Houston in advance of major storms, as the City does now, creates extra capacity in the lake so that it can absorb more water without flooding homes and businesses. This strategy (coupled with the seasonal lowering of Lake Conroe) has worked effectively since Harvey and prevented flooding on more than one occasion.

Time Vs. Release Capacity Vs. Water Preservation

However, right now, it takes so long to release water from Lake Houston that storms can sometimes veer away and miss us after the lowering starts. Thus, water could be wasted. But bigger gates would let dam operators release the same volume of water in less time, so operators would not have to start releasing water so far in advance. In other words they would have a higher degree of confidence that the the storm would not veer away and that release was worthwhile.

Martin reassured people that:

  • Smaller (i.e., less costly) floodgates can lower Lake Houston sufficiently if given enough time
  • The lake usually refills quickly
  • Even if it doesn’t, the City can always call for the release of water from Lake Conroe.

We should know within a few months whether Black & Veatch, the engineering company leading the project, has succeeded in designing additional gates within the budget that meet all other objectives.

Staying on the schedule above will be ambitious. FEMA must approve the BCR before releasing money for construction.

Posted by Bob Rehak on April 21, 2022

1696 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Progress Report New Woodridge Village Floodwater Detention Basin

A new floodwater detention basin that will ultimately more than double the capacity of Woodridge Village is expanding slowly but steadily. To date, 33,159 cubic yards have been excavated! The pictures below show progress since the start of work in late January.

Photos showing Progress

Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) announced the project on 11/24/2021. Excavation started on 1/27/22.

beginning of Woodridge Village excavation
First truckloads of of excavated material leave the southwest corner of the site on 1/27/22. Looking SW.
Wider shot taken on same day looking NE looking in opposite direction. The new basin will eventually expand to cover most of the area within the road, tree-line on the left, and the ditch that bisects the property from left to right.
Photo taken on 2/14/22 shows the excavation expanding. Looking SW.
Four days later. 2/18/22. Looking SW toward entrance.
Another three days later, on 2/21/22.
3/10/22
3/22/22 after a 2.26 inch rain.
3/28/22. Looking NE.
4/17/22. Looking SW.
Basin will ultimately expand to green boundary.

About Vendor’s Contract

The stormwater detention basin still has a long way to go before it reaches its ultimate size. HCFCD is excavating it under the terms of an E&R (Excavation and Removal) contract with Sprint Sand and Clay.

Sprint has agreed to remove up to 500,000 Cubic Yards of dirt for only $1,000. However, it has the right to sell the dirt at market rates to make a profit. But the dirt can only elevate structures outside of current floodplains.

Three Months Into Contract, Beating the Minimums

When Perry Homes finished its planned floodwater detention basins, it had enough capacity to hold a hundred year rain as defined by pre-Atlas-14 standards. But capacity fell 40% short of Atlas-14 requirements.

The addition of the new detention basin should take capacity well beyond Atlas-14 requirements and create a safety margin that accommodates additional upstream development.

Excavation under an E&R contract can have ups and downs. When construction booms, excavation moves along quickly. But when construction slows, excavation can, too. However, the contract does have minimum excavation requirement of 10,000 cubic yards per month written into it.

At 36,000 cubic yards after roughly 2.5 months, Sprint exceeds the minimum. But if that rate continues, it could take another four years to reach 500,000 cubic yards.

At some point, the county may choose to step in and pay market rates for excavation to speed things up. But until then, every truckload hauled out of Woodridge Village by Sprint will reduce the ultimate cost.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/18/2022

1693 Days after Hurricane Harvey

Texas Now Has Flood Disclosure For Renters

Several years ago, a new Texas law mandated flood disclosure for home buyers. Effective January 1, 2022, we now have a similar law for renters. The last legislature added a new section to the Texas Property Code: § 92.0135. But read the fine print. The law has some huge “qualifiers.”

Jennifer Parks Rental townhome
Many of the Marina Drive Townhomes destroyed by Harvey were rented out. Even though the ground level flooded frequently, landlords in such situations would not have been required to disclose past flooding...until this year.

Floodplain Disclosure Requirement

The new law requires landlords to provide tenants with special notice if their structure is located in the 100-year floodplain designated by FEMA. The notice must also inform tenants that:

  • “Even if the dwelling is not in a 100-year floodplain, the dwelling may still be susceptible to flooding.”
  • “Most tenant insurance policies do not cover damages or loss incurred in a flood.”
  • “You should seek insurance coverage that would cover losses caused by a flood.”

Exception for Elevated Structures

However, the landlord is not required to tell tenants that the property is in the floodplain if the building has been elevated above it. Hmmmm. What about that vehicle in the parking lot?

Flood Disclosure Required…But Only If in Past 5 Years

Regardless of the floodplain status, if a building has flooded in the last five years, the landlord must disclose that to a prospective tenant. This five-year limitation, is one of the biggest flaws in the law, in my opinion. The landlord would currently not have to disclose flooding in the 1994, Allison, Ike, the May 25-27 floods in 2015, or the Tax Day and Memorial Day Floods in 2016. And come September, the landlord would not have to disclose flooding during Hurricane Harvey either.

A lady in the apartment complex pictured above flooded eight times in five years!

Written Communication, Separate From Lease Required

However, if the landlord must provide notice, he/she must do it in separate written communication at/or before the signing of the lease.

“Substantial Loss” May Trigger Termination of Lease

If the landlord fails to provide the required notice AND if the tenant suffers a “substantial loss,” the tenant may terminate the lease within 30 days after flood damage occurred. The law defines substantial as 50% or more of the value of repairs to or replacement of the renter’s personal property – on the day the damage occurred.

Lease Termination Only Allowed For 30 Days

Another “but”: termination of the lease becomes effective when the tenant moves out, not at the time of damage.

Within another 30 days after the termination of the lease, the landlord must refund “all rent or other amounts paid in advance under the lease for any period after the effective date of the termination of the lease.”

Flooding No Excuse for Unpaid Rent

The new law does not affect “a tenant’s liability for delinquent, unpaid rent or other sums owed to the landlord before the date the lease was terminated.” So, in other words, if it takes you a full month to move your flood damaged possessions out after the flood, you would owe the landlord for that month.

I am not a lawyer and do not provide legal advice, but that’s how I read the law. Regardless of whether you are a landlord or a tenant, you should read it yourself and discuss it with your lawyer if you have questions.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/16/22 based on a tip from a reader

1691 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Lake Houston Area Flood Prevention Initiative Takes Position on SJRA Sand Trap Proposal

Bill McCabe of the Lake Houston Area Flood Prevention Initiative submitted this letter in response to the SJRA’s Request for Public Input on its Sediment Removal and Sand Trap Pilot Study proposal. He raises a concern that no one else has so far: The proposal may run afoul of the recently adopted Best Management Practices for Sand Mining in the San Jacinto River Watershed. The essence of the study’s recommendation: allow sand miners to remove sediment from the point bars outside mines. However, the BMPs stipulate undisturbed buffer zones between mines and the river.

Page 8 of the Freese & Nichols Sediment Removal and Sand Trap Study for the SJRA shows this schematic of the recommended solution.

McCabe has given ReduceFlooding.com permission to reproduce his letter. See below.


To the SJRA:

Thank you very much for the opportunity to respond to the Sand Trap Study you have formulated. I think your initial work is excellent and commend you on your data gathering.  However, there are a few points I would like you to consider before proceeding.

As you know, my group worked very hard with TCEQ to establish Best Management Practices (BMPs) for Sand Miners in the San Jacinto watershed.  This Rulemaking was approved in early 2022 and incorporated into 30 TAC Chapter 311, Subchapter J.  Also approved was corresponding Regulatory Guidance document RG 555, implementing the BMP Rules.

Key Provision: Undisturbed Buffer Zones

A key provision of the Regulatory Guidance is:

2.1.1 Vegetative Buffer Zones Vegetative buffer zones are continuous undisturbed or planted vegetated areas that surround a development, or land disturbance activity, or that border an intermittent stream or permanent water body. Buffer zones aid in sediment filtration and removal by slowing surface water flow through these areas. Disperse construction site runoff over the entire buffer zone if possible. A minimum 100-foot buffer zone is required adjacent to perennial streams greater than 20 feet wide, 50 feet for perennial streams less than 20 feet wide, and 35 feet for intermittent streams. Measure buffer zones from the stream bank to the nearest area of disturbance at the site.”

Study Recommendation is “Counterintuitive”

We had fought very hard to establish these buffer zones (at one time we had proposed buffer zones of 1,500 feet).  The very essence of this provision was to KEEP the miners out of the San Jacinto riverbed.  Now to go back and allow in-stream mining seems counter-intuitive to me.

Legal Complications of Waiving Buffer Zone

Additionally, I am not certain how you would get this buffer zone condition waived.  HB 1824 issues a waiver per the Parks and Wildlife Code, Sec. 86.017.  However, it does not address TCEQ regulation at 30 TAC Chapter 311(J), which was implemented AFTER HB 1824 was passed.  You need to have your staff look at the interaction between the two conflicting provisions.

More Holistic Approach Needed

Before proceeding, I would suggest looking closely at Bob Rehak’s Holistic approach to reducing sedimentation, as outlined in one of his recent articles:

  • Revegetating riverbanks
  • Dredging more often where the sand builds up near the mouth of the West Fork
  • Dredging a channel through the mouth bar area
  • Reinforcing sand-mine dikes to withstand floods
  • Leaving more natural green space between mines and the river
  • Moving sand mine stockpiles out of floodway/floodplain areas
  • Only clearing areas actively being mined
  • Decreasing the slope of sand mine dikes

https://reduceflooding.com/2022/03/27/sjra-seeks-public-input-on-sediment-trap-proposal/
Yours truly,

William McCabe, Lake Houston Area Grassroots Flood Prevention Initiative 


If you have questions or comments on the SJRA’s Sediment Trap Proposal, please submit them via email to: floodmanagementdivision@sjra.net

Deadline: No later than April 29, 2022

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/15/22 based on a letter by Bill McCabe, Chairman of the Lake Houston Area Flood Prevention Initiative

1690 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Editorial: Brain Drain in Harris County Government Compromises Service, Productivity

(Updated 4/15/22 with additional information.) The high-level brain drain among department heads and their deputies in Harris County Government compromises both service and productivity.

An article in The Texan about the fiasco at Universal Services, Harris County’s IT department, discussed the department’s new CIO. A system used by law enforcement, prosecutors, and the courts went down for two days. So, a magistrate ordered the release of 280 suspects who had been held without the requisite probable cause or bond hearings. 

Those who testified about the root cause for the system outage in commissioners court cited high turnover among IT personnel and the resulting lack of institutional knowledge as two main causes. 

That got me to thinking about leadership turnover in Harris County departments. 

Earlier this year, the County announced FIVE new department heads in ONE commissioners court meeting! After my investigation, I learned that at least 16 of 20 department heads have changed under County Judge Lina Hidalgo. Some department heads have turned over more than once during Hidalgo’s time in office!

Professional Vs. Political Credentials

Turnover is a fact of life in any organization. And at the federal level, you expect department heads to change with incoming administrations. But at the county level, not so much.

At this level, holding a job should be about technical proficiency, not political affiliation. Service is about fixing things, such as potholes, drainage and flooding. Or supplying disaster relief and healthcare. Job success requires professional qualifications and experience more than political loyalty. You wouldn’t choose a heart surgeon because of his/her political affiliation. Would you?

And as one source, who needs to remain anonymous, told me, “ABRUPT change or turnover is never good. There is not adequate time for proper transfer of information, or proper handover of programs, projects, and initiatives.  When folks resign abruptly or worse yet, are let go for political reasons, there is no immediate training and there is no transfer of information on critical and important work.”

Extraordinary Turnover Among Management

I am not saying that new appointees are not talented or qualified. They may be; I just have no way of knowing. However, I will say this based on 50 years of business experience. Excessive turnover almost always lowers productivity, disrupts service, creates costly rookie errors, and leads to unnecessary replacement costs.

By any measure, Harris County has had an extraordinary amount of turnover lately – especially at high- and mid-levels. The heads of at least 16 departments out of 20 have been forced out. That’s 80%.

Many reportedly resigned under pressure. Some had worked for the county for more than 30 years under multiple administrations. Moreover, some groups in the Engineering Department have lost up to FOUR levels of management.

How High Turnover Lowers Productivity

Excessive turnover can lower productivity several ways. 

  • Finding replacements for talented employees increases recruitment and training costs, both of which are avoidable.
  • High turnover typically lowers employee morale, which affects productivity. Employees worry less about job performance than whether they will be forced out next. 
  • After employees leave, remaining staff try to shoulder extra work and may burn out due to the higher workload.
  • When new hires finally arrive after several months, teaching them how things operate distracts current employees from their own work on projects. 
  • New hires also often struggle with new responsibilities and procedures. Departing employees take all their knowledge, experience, and skills with them. While remaining employees can provide some of that, they can’t provide it all. That lowers productivity while the new employees try to figure things out.

And the more specialized the job is, the more acute “the productivity drag” usually is. The loss of a good, high-level manager can affect the productivity of a whole department.

Main Reasons Why People Quit

In addition to the people forced out, many have quit. When you look at the main reasons why people quit, they include:

  • A toxic work culture. In terms of predicting quitting, a toxic culture is ten times more important than compensation. High turnover signals that something is seriously wrong with management or the culture.
  • The boss. According to multiple studies, most employees quit their boss, not the organization. Professionals want bosses who can teach them things and help them grow within their professions. Political appointees may not have that skill set. 
  • Negative assessments of the organization’s future and their own. Employees’ feelings about the future can predict attrition. No one wants to be the last to the lifeboats.

Changes In Department Heads

At a minimum, recent changes in Harris County Department heads include:

1. Universal Services

Major General Rick Noriega replaced Bruce High, who served since 2009. According to Fox News, after taking over, Noriega reportedly lost 23 employees – in ONE group – and lied to commissioners about the number. Another source put the number in ALL groups closer to 100.

2. Flood Control:

Christina (Tina) Petersen, formerly with the Harris-Galveston Subsidence District, replaced Russ Poppe. Between Poppe and Petersen, Alan Black served as Interim Executive Director. Matt Zeve, Poppe’s second in command, resigned, as did Marcus Stuckett, Flood Control’s Director of Engineering, and Craig Maske, the District’s Chief Planning Officer. Those losses will make it more difficult for Petersen to get up to speed.

3. Engineering

Dr. Milton Rahman, PE PMP CFM ENV SP, (formerly deputy chief of staff for Commissioner Adrian Garcia) replaced John Blount, PE CFM LEED AP, as County Engineer. Blount served in the Engineering Department for 34 years under many different county judges and commissioners. According to one source who spoke on condition of anonymity, TWO group managers have been fired and SEVEN left voluntarily since Rahman took over. In some cases, FOUR levels of management are gone! My source says that Rahman wiped out all but one manager in the crucial Operations Group. 

Firings of long-term and well respected employees were done so unprofessionally, according to multiple sources, that it caused a huge impact on moral. As a result, numerous long-term employees left for higher paying jobs in  the private sector. The Engineer’s Office was always considered apolitical, working for all members of Commissioners Court equally. But no longer. Sources say Rahman has used political intimidation to transfer resources from other precincts into Garcia’s Precinct 2.

4. Public Health

Barbie Robinson from Sacramento, California replaced Umair Shah, MD, MPH. Her reviews have been mixed so far. According to one source I talked to, Ms. Robinson may still live in California. She has reportedly attended meetings via Microsoft Teams. I cannot verify how much time she spends in Houston versus Sacramento. Between Shah and Robinson, Gwen Sims served as Interim Executive Director for six months.

5. Community Services

David Turkel had served as the department’s Executive Director for more than 20 years when Daphne Lemelle replaced him in 2018. Lamelle then came under fire for failure to distribute Harvey relief funds quickly enough and for hiring Guy Rankin, the disgraced ex-head of the Harris County Housing Authority, who was fired by the County for allegedly misspending millions in Federal dollars. Josh Stuckey then became Interim Director. Dr. Adrienne Holloway then took over the department and was replaced by Thao Costis at the end of 2022. So, six leadership changes under Hidalgo.

6. Intergovernmental and Global Affairs: (No website)

According to LinkedIn, Ender Reed replaced former department director Donna Warndoff in 2020. He then took another job in the private sector in 2021. Hidalgo has not announced his replacement yet. Applications closed at the end of this March.

7. Economic Equity and Opportunity 

…is a new department proposed by Commissioner Rodney Ellis in 2020. He announced that Pamela Chan would become the department’s first executive director in 2021. That didn’t last long. According to one insider, she got “fed-up.” The new director is Diana Aguilar Ramirez.

On October 28, 2019, Jim Bethke began serving as Director of this new department. Dr. Ana Yañez-Correa replaced him less than two years later.

9. Election Administration:

This is another new office. Isabel Longoria was sworn in as Harris County’s first-ever elections administrator on Nov. 18, 2020. Lina Hidalgo lauded her experience as a community organizer. After long lines, technology glitches, understaffing, and failing to count 10,000 votes in the primary election this year, Isabel Longoria resigned on March 8. Hidalgo has not yet announced her successor.

10. Harris County Toll Road Authority (HCTRA): 

After leading HCTRA since 2014, the well respected Gary K. Trietsch, PE, retired in 2020. Roberto Treviño, PE, replaced him. It didn’t take long for the org charts to change. All but one of seven deputy directors in the department changed under Treviño. (See before/after org charts below.) According to one long-time county insider, reorganizing a department is the quickest way to purge people whose political obedience a new manager may question.  

11. Management and Budget:

In early 2020, Harris County fired Bill Jackson in an effort led by Commissioner Adrian Garcia. Jackson had headed the department for nine years and obtained a AAA bond rating for the county through prudent financial management. But certain commissioners claimed he wasn’t transparent enough. They replaced him with Dave Berry who held the job for a little more than a year before taking another county job in 2021. Daniel Ramos, formerly a deputy city administrator for the mayor of Baltimore, MD, replaced Berry. So, again…three leaders…in just TWO years.

12. County Administration:

This is a new department formed on June 29, 2021. Dave Berry heads it and is trying to organize it. Here is his planned org chart – minus names. It just shows departments. Notice how it effectively demotes all department heads by making them report to Commissioners Court through Berry and/or a deputy county administrator. Here is Berry’s transition plan

13. Human Resources and Risk Management:

…is also a new department reporting to Berry. He broke it out of Management and Budget. It will have three divisions: Human Resources, Benefits & Wellness, and Risk Management. Neither the website, Berry’s Transition Plan, nor the department directory list a director for this new department yet.

14. Office of Sustainability (No website):

This is not a full department. It will bring together staff from different departments and Commissioner Precincts whom Berry believes are best situated to act on sustainability initiatives. Lisa Lin, new as of Jan 25, 2022, will head the office. Lin formerly worked for the Houston mayor’s office, the city of San Antonio and Rice University. 

15. Pretrial Services:

In 2021, Natalie Michailides replaced Dr. Kelvin Banks who headed the department from 2016 to December 2020.

16) Pollution Control Services

Dr. Latrice Babin replaced Bob Allen in 2019. However, she was promoted from within, having worked in the department for 25 years. Bob Allen had headed the department since 2011.

80% of Department Heads Changed

That’s 16 out of 20 departments in Berry’s transition plan. What about the other departments?

  • The leader of Forensic Sciences has been Luis Arturo Sanchez, M.D. since 2003, long before Hidalgo took office.
  • Ed Emmett, the previous county judge appointed the current Fire Marshall, Laurie Christensen, and she still heads that department.
  • Edward Melton leads the Public Library Department. A Facebook post shows he was also appointed by Ed Emmett and is still there. I can’t find much more about him.
  • David Simpson is the Executive Director of the Domestic Relations Department. He has held that position since the department’s first executive director retired in 2001. His predecessor, Nancy Westerfeld, had held that position since 1984. So, just two leaders in 38 years, according to an employee who used to work in the department.

The first 16 departments have had 34 leaders under Hidalgo. And she is looking for new leaders for at least three of those departments – Intergovernmental & Global Affairs; Human Resources & Risk Management; Election Administration – so the total could soon climb higher. Perhaps she should start with a new Human Resources & Risk Management director.

Group Heads within Departments Replaced, Too

Turnover affects people below department heads also. Take the case of the Harris County Tollroad Authority, for example. Compare the two org charts below under Trietsch and his successor, Treviño. Only one person remained as of January this year.

HCTRA Org Chart in 2019 under Trietsch. Compare with the one below.
HCTRA Org Chart under Treviño less than two years later. Everyone except Tyler has been replaced, likely affecting productivity.

These charts dramatize the change at the deputy and assistant director levels. I couldn’t find comparable charts for other departments online. However, several sources told me that in Engineering, up to four layers of management have left in some groups. Another source told me that after the effort by Garcia to oust Bill Jackson (see #11 above), the number of people who decided to leave the county increased dramatically.

Turnover Isn’t the Only Thing to Increase 

Did the replacement of 16 department heads (sometimes more than once) result in improved service? Perhaps in some cases. But look at the headlines lately:

This is what you get when you put politics above professional credentials. As one person said on condition of anonymity, “The three Democrats on commissioners court are firing just about everyone hired by a Republican and replacing them with political loyalists.” You’re paying the price.

That price includes not only service disruptions and lower productivity. It also includes replacement costs for those who leave. Cost estimates for replacing managers range from 200% to 400% of their annual salaries. If the 400% estimate is accurate and if department heads made $250,000 per year, replacing them would cost a million dollars each. And some of these departments have had two or three heads since Hidalgo. That ads up to far more money than the Elevate Strategies Covid-Outreach Scandal. So why aren’t more people talking about excessive turnover?

Add Failure and Delay of Important Initiatives to Cost

Several sources told me about the failure and delay of important initiatives. You can add the loss of time in those initiatives and the cost of potential future impacts to the replacement costs above. The initiatives include:

  • Atlas 14: With the departure of key General Services and Permit Office personnel, who has the experience or know how to assist the development community on Atlas 14 implementation and floodplain changes in the very near future?
  • Environmental and Water Quality:  Are any experts left? Who understands the state and federal laws that impact/dictate projects?
  • County Transportation Plan:
    • The Equity Study has stalled. So has a framework to implement it. There has been no movement on equity in transportation.
    • Likewise, there has been little to no movement on Vision Zero, the county’s effort to eliminate traffic fatalities.
    • There has also been little to no movement on the county’s Multimodal, Major Thoroughfare plan to improve connectivity.
    • Nothing notable has happened lately on Low Impact Development, Green Infrastructure, or other environmentally-friendly projects.

And most important, as another hurricane season approaches, no Engineering staff remain that led Disaster Recovery Operations, i.e., debris collection; monitoring; road and bridge inspections; inventorying; permitting and inspections. 

As one person said, “No transition occurred! The expertise in disaster recovery, and floodplain mapping and management have vanished over a very short period of time. The exact same thing happened at Universal Services, but not as fast and deep. We can already see the results.”

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/14/2022 and updated on 4/15/22 and 4/20/22 with new information

1689 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Review: I Would Have Never Bought This Home If I Knew It Flooded

On April 11, 2022, I read an outstanding guest editorial in the New York Times by Elizabeth Rush, a professor in the English Department at Brown University. The title: “I never would have bought this home if I knew it flooded.” It’s a story about the systemic causes of flooding and common-sense solutions that seem so difficult to implement politically…despite devastating consequences for so many flood victims.

A Kindred Spirit

Since Hurricane Harvey in 2017, I have covered many of the things Rush mentions. Reading about them in other parts of the country made me understand how the problems extend far beyond Harris County and Texas.

Rush starts by discussing how flooding seems to get worse each year. But hers is not just another climate change story. She also cites people filling in wetlands to put up strip malls, developing low-lying land, and flood maps that haven’t been updated for decades. Sound familiar?

Subtext of Deception

The unwritten subtext here is that of deception, although Rush never uses that word. Many of the people she interviewed felt deceived into buying flood-prone property, hence the title of her editorial.

The people she interviewed – both in government and the public – had many great recommendations:

  • Don’t build where it floods.
  • Stop recycling flooded properties.
  • Disclose flood risks.
  • Protect or restore ecologies that reduce flooding.
  • Make flood insurance fair.
  • Change the minimum requirements that communities must meet to be eligible to participate in the federal flood insurance program.
  • Revise antiquated regs that permit development of flood prone parcels, and which only mandate raising them after they flood.
  • Enforce the prohibition against selling federally subsidized flood insurance for newly built properties in areas likely to flood.
  • Make disclosure of past flooding mandatory – for renters as well as buyers. (Texas has had it for buyers for several years now.) And as of January 1 this year, Texas also has it for renters if flooding happened within the last 5 years.

Difficulty of Political Change

I have talked about each of those recommendations for years now. But political change is hard. It requires picking winners and losers. And few politicians are willing to pick sides in those arguments, especially in Texas where property rights rule.

Regardless, one can’t help but wonder whether the current system is sustainable. The National Flood Insurance Program is $20 billion in the red and just this month FEMA fully transitioned to fully risk-based premiums.

Professor Rush closes with a poignant truth from Brock Long, a former head of FEMA. “Rebuilding disaster-devastated communities ultimately costs much more than implementing stronger codes and mitigation programs over time,” he said.

She also cites the National Association of Home Builders, which is fighting changes. She says, they “are trying to fend off reforms by arguing, in part, that they will make homes unaffordable, especially for low-income buyers. But when a flood hits, it’s the poorest who often suffer most.” And really! Does anyone ever find a flood affordable?

Rush is a gifted writer and researcher. She was a finalist for a Pulitzer Prize in 2019 based on her book about flooding: Rising: Dispatches from the New American Shore. I highly recommend her essay and intend to buy her book.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/13/2022 based on an editorial by Elizabeth Rush in the New York Times

1688 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Deep-Time Digital Earth Program Could Revolutionize Sustainable Development

Deep-time Digital Earth is a consortium of international organizations, geological surveys, research institutes and industry. It’s the first “Big Science Program” of the International Union of Geological Sciences (IUGS). The group hopes to transform Earth science by “harmonizing global, Deep-time Digital Earth data, and sharing global geoscience knowledge.

River Grove Sand Bar
After Harvey, the Kingwood Diversion Ditch was blocked by this giant 12 foot high, quarter mile long sand bar. A Chinese member of the Deep-time Digital Earth team studied this bar as part of his doctoral dissertation. See below.

Massive Data Integration Effort

Think of this as a massive data integration effort. The end result: linked, interoperable databases that make information available across protocols, platforms, and scientific disciplines. They will use Big Data analytics, cloud computing, data mining, machine learning and artificial intelligence to link all earth-science data and encourage collaboration among experts. The experts could be in the various branches of the geosciences (i.e., geology, geography, meteorology, geomorphology, paleontology, sedimentology, etc.) as well as engineers, social scientists, and economists.

Data brought together in new ways may provide novel glimpses into the Earth’s geological past and its future.

Research will focus on:

  1. Life – global biodiversity patterns
  2. Materials – investigation of spatial and temporal distribution
  3. Geography – paleogeographic reconstructions
  4. Climate adaptation – geoscience solutions.

What is Deep Time?

Deep time means going back to the beginning of Earth’s history. John McPhee introduced the term to describe the concept of geologic time in his Basin and Range(1981), parts of which originally appeared in the New Yorker magazine.

Deep-time data is data relating to the changing processes that the Earth has experienced through the billions of years of geological time. It includes data on the evolution of life and climate, tectonic plate movement and the evolution of the planet’s geography.

Wedding Structured, Unstructured Data

Imagine trying to integrate all the studies of Earth, a subject approximately 4.5 billion years old. The studies include both structured and unstructured data. Think of structured data as information rigidly formatted in tables and databases – like what you found at a given depth while drilling an oil well. Unstructured data, on the other hand, includes the learning found in books, where the authors structured thoughts in unique ways.

Now imagine you’re able to relate everything.

Imagine the Problems You Might Solve

Imagine relating all this data to solve some of the world’s most pressing problems. For instance:

  • Population growth will greatly impact the Earth’s finite resources. It will put increasing pressure on water availability, both for drinking and agriculture.
  • The availability of fertile land is limited, a situation that is exacerbated by the degradation of natural ecosystems.
  • There will be increasing demand on finite sources of energy, with fossil fuels having to be extracted from previously unexploited locations.
  • Other rare materials are also being used at rates that are unsustainable, for example, demand for gallium for use in emerging technologies, such as thin layer photovoltaics. 
  • Geological scarcity is a critical issue, complicated by the geographical distribution of resources. 

Or perhaps you want to:

  • Reduce vulnerability to natural hazards, such as floods
  • Mitigate the effects of waste and pollution
  • Understand human influence on global change
  • Understand the geological processes involved in soil science
  • Manage resources and sustain the environment
  • Understand the relationship between geological factors and health.

The Sudden Bi-sociation of Two Previously Unrelated Planes of Thought

Imagine what collaborating with a million other scientists could lead to!

Arthur Koestler, in his landmark book, The Act of Creation, defines the creative process as “the sudden bi-sociation of two previously unrelated planes of thought.” Suddenly, while reading about one thing, you see a solution to an unrelated problem in something else.

Koestler gives hundreds of examples from the history of science, such as Newton getting dinged on the head with an apple and discovering gravity.

Who knows where Deep-time Digital Earth could lead? But I’m eager to follow it.

The San Jacinto River Connection to Deep-Time Digital Earth

Ironically, I first learned about this program from someone I corresponded with after Harvey. A Chinese student named Haipeng Li from the Colorado School of Mines working on his PhD dissertation visited this area to study erosion and deposition on the San Jacinto River. In one flood, you could see changes that might otherwise take several lifetimes. Haipeng used ReduceFlooding.com to study the aerial photos and review other scientific research archived on the site about the San Jacinto river system. Dr. Li later returned to China where he now works on the Deep-time Digital Earth Project.

You just never know where a chance encounter might lead!

Posted by Bob Rehak on April 11, 2022

1686 Days since Hurricane Harvey