Are Ditches or Storm Sewers More Effective at Reducing Flooding?

5/9/2025 – Houston has 3,900 miles of storm sewers and 2,500 miles of roadside ditches. When it comes to reducing flooding, roadside ditches and storm sewers each have their pros and cons. But before looking at the strengths and limitations of each, let’s consider some basic capacity and performance differences.

Capacity and Performance

A typical grass ditch 3.5 feet deep and 1,000 feet long can hold 325,000 gallons of runoff before overtopping – more than ten times the volume than that of a 24-inch storm sewer of equal length. In essence, the ditch itself acts as a long, linear detention basin, reducing flood peaks downstream.

While open ditches by themselves may have more storage capacity than storm sewers, streets with storm sewers are often depressed. Thus, the streets themselves can provide additional temporary storage until the storm sewers drain. Even if the street floods for a period of time, the street may provide enough extra capacity to keep homes from flooding.

Plus, storm sewers move water faster because of their smoothness. They offer less friction. And that offsets the capacity of ditches somewhat. But speed can also have a downside. Water can rush all at once to an already swollen bayou.

Open ditches also provide infiltration and filtration opportunities, improving water quality before reaching waterways. For this reason, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has noted that well-designed vegetated swales can improve stormwater quality.

The natural processes in a ditch – absorption by soil, uptake by plants, evaporation – can mitigate flooding and provide environmental co-benefits that storm sewers lack. But…

Maintenance Challenges with Ditches

To maintain their effectiveness, ditches require frequent maintenance including regrading, de-silting, unblocking, and flushing driveway culverts. Few homeowners can handle such tasks. Thus, lack of routine maintenance has been a major limitation of open ditch systems in Houston.

Many older suburban neighborhoods with ditches have seen capacity decline over time due to infrequent maintenance, leading residents to complain of street flooding from what should be a fixable drainage issue.

Quickly funneling runoff to bayous can contribute to higher downstream flood peaks. If not mitigated, they trade street flood risk for potentially greater flooding in waterways.

blocked roadside ditches
Blocked roadside ditches in several north Houston neighborhoods.

Strengths and Limitations of Each

Below is a summary of the strengths and limitations of storm sewers and ditches.

Storm Sewers – Strengths:
  • Space Efficiency: Underground pipes free up surface space for roads, sidewalks, and landscaping, crucial in dense areas.
  • Urban Compatibility: Curb and gutter streets are better for traffic and pedestrian safety in cities.
  • Rapid Drainage: Can quickly carry water away during and after small to moderate storms, clearing streets faster once rain ends.
  • Low Profile Maintenance: No open water at surface so safer for children. No marshy ditches in front yards. No need for mowing or weed control.
  • Less Obstruction: Less prone to large debris blockage (covered inlets keep out big trash, though they can clog with litter/leaves).
Storm Sewers – Limitations:
  • Limited Capacity/Volume: Pipes have restricted diameter; they carry less water volume than an equivalent open channel. In heavy rain, they fill up quickly, then excess water floods the street.
  • High Cost: Expensive to install and upgrade. Retrofitting a larger pipe is a major construction project. Economics may limit their size (designers balance capacity vs. cost, often resulting in designs that handle only smaller storms).
  • Out-of-Sight Failures: Problems (sediment buildup, collapse, clogs) are hidden underground. Maintenance requires specialized crews and equipment (vacuum trucks, confined-space entry). Issues may go unnoticed until flooding occurs.
  • Fast Runoff Discharge: Quickly funneling runoff to bayous can contribute to higher downstream floods.
  • Dependency on Outfalls: If the receiving channel is high (e.g., bayou at flood stage), storm sewers can’t drain and may even backflow. They have little resiliency in such conditions.
Open Drainage Ditches – Strengths:
  • Large Capacity & Storage: Can convey and hold significantly more water than buried pipes for the same length. Acts as built-in detention, reducing peak flow and helping attenuate floods.
  • Cost-Effective Installation: Cheaper to construct initially – essentially just grading earth – making them feasible in new lower-density developments or where budgets constrain.
  • Natural Drainage Benefits: Encourages infiltration and evaporation, uptake by grasses. Vegetation filters pollutants, improving water quality.
  • Easy Problem Identification: Problems like blockages or erosion are visible and simple to fix without heavy, expensive underground work and ripping up streets.
  • Flood Mitigation Role: By slowing runoff, they reduce the likelihood of sudden flash flooding. Streets with roadside swales often avoid deep inundation in moderate storms.
Open Drainage Ditches – Limitations:
  • Land Use and Aesthetics: Require wider rights-of-way and reduce useable yard space. Some consider them unsightly or “rural-looking.” They complicate driveway design (need culverts) and can be obstacles for pedestrians (few sidewalks in ditch neighborhoods).
  • High Maintenance Demand: Must be kept clear of silt, trash, and overgrowth to function. Neglected ditches lose capacity and can cause flooding worse than if a proper sewer were in place. Maintenance is continuous (mowing, dredging every few years), which can be a burden on residents or cash-strapped city programs.
  • Slower Drainage & Standing Water: Water may stand for days in flat areas. Poorly graded ditches can have sections that never fully drain. Standing ditch water is a common complaint.
  • Limited Applicability in Dense Areas: Not suitable for high-density urban neighborhoods. Physically impractical on narrow streets or where buildings are close to the road.
  • Potential Safety Hazards: Open water and drop-offs pose risks – vehicles can end up in ditches during accidents or flooding. Also, eroded ditches can undermine road edges if not fixed.

Which is Better?

There is no one-size-fits-all; Houston’s vast size means both systems will continue to be used.

In low-density residential areas of Houston, enhanced and well-maintained drainage ditches are often better suited to reduce street and property flooding (thanks to their storage capacity and slower release of stormwater).

However, in high-density areas, storm sewers with curbs are more appropriate despite their limits, as they fit the space and usage needs, such as on-street parking.

We should use the volume capacity of open ditches AND the efficient conveyance of storm sewers as complementary pieces of Houston’s complex drainage puzzle.

For More Information

See this illuminating, footnoted and annotated 7,000 word deep dive into ditches and storm sewers by ChatGPT 40. I borrowed heavily from it for this post.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/9/25

2810 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Crucial Operations Begin In Northpark Expansion

5/8/25 – Several crucial operations that are part of the Northpark expansion project should soon begin in the quest to create the first all-weather evacuation route from Kingwood. Contractors are about to begin:

  • Boring under the the UnionPacific Railroad (UPRR) tracks to connect the drainage on either side
  • Installing two junction boxes west of Loop 494 on the south side of Northpark to convey stormwater to the north side.
  • Relocating an electrical distribution box next to Exxon at US59.
  • Modifying the Exxon station itself.

Separately, contractors have already started clearing surface lanes on the south side of Northpark between Loop 494 and Marco’s Pizza. The lanes will carry traffic next to the bridge going over 494 and the UPRR tracks.

This post will also discuss utility-related delays to date and the timetable for completing project components. Those include Phase II, a new detention basin, and widening of the northernmost portion of the Kingwood Diversion ditch.

Prep for Bore Under Tracks Started Today

Preparation for the bore under the tracks started today. An auger started drilling holes that will define the edges of the bore pit.

Auger drilling first hole.

The pit will contain a steel framework to protect contractors from cave-ins as they work.

See line of holes dug by auger and covered by boards.

Junction Boxes for Drainage West of Loop 494

The Northpark expansion plan calls for two junction boxes to link culverts on both sides of Northpark – one by Sonic, the other by the dry cleaners on the corner of Loop 494.

Looking west toward 59. The junction boxes will collect stormwater from the south (left) side of Northpark and convey it under the street to the north side.

Contractors will build the junction boxes first. Then they will link 6′ x 6′ reinforced concrete culverts by digging trenches across Northpark in stages. Each stage will disrupt traffic on one side of the road while traffic is routed to the other.

Changes near Exxon Station

There are two major operations closer to 59 in the Northpark expansion plan. First, Entergy must move an electrical junction box out of the right of way near the Exxon station.

Second, Exxon will lose part of its canopy and one pump island. Both encroach on the right of way.

Electrical box is circled. Dotted line shows approximate right-of-way. Setback appears wider in the foreground because of wide-angle-lens distortion.

Surface Lanes East of 494 on South Side of Northpark

In the last few days, contractors have begun clearing underbrush for what will become two surface lanes on the south side of the bridge over 494 and the railroad tracks. See below.

The tall pine trees are too large to move and will likely go to a sawmill.

Perhaps for the first time, one can truly appreciate how wide Northpark expansion will be compared to the four lanes we had. See below.

Looking E. A six-lane bridge will taper down to ground level through this area with two surface lanes on each side.
Reverse angle. Looking W toward 59.

This road will move some traffic!

194 Days of Delays to Date

Due to multiple utility-related delays, the Phase I Northpark expansion project has slipped 194 days to date. The Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority/TIRZ 10 board reviewed that this morning.

I extracted the 18 relevant pages from the 473-page board packet for you. They detail hundreds of unexpected utility delays.

The screen capture below shows the financial impact of LHRA/TIRZ 10 projects on the City of Houston’s Capital Improvement Plan.

It also shows expected completion dates. Phase I should wrap up next year.

Phase II should finish in 2028. It includes the portion of Northpark expansion that extends past Woodland Hills.

A detention basin, previously part of Phase II has become its own project to accelerate it. That will reduce flood risk sooner for residents along Bens Branch and the Diversion Ditch.

The detention basin project includes widening of the northernmost portion of the diversion ditch. It should start next year and finish in 2027.

For More Information

See the Lake Houston Redevelopment Authority project web pages or these posts on ReduceFlooding:

UPRR:
Evacuation Route:
Plan Details:
Phase II:

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/8/25

2809 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Is It Safe to Build 7,000 Homes on Ryko Land?

5/7/25 – A developer named Ryko has announced plans to build 7000 homes on floodplain land that could be inundated with 7 to 25 feet of floodwater in the next 0.2% annual chance storm. The Houston area has had four such storms in the last 10 years.

From a public policy perspective, that raises three questions:

  • Could homeowners on Ryko land survive a major flood?
  • Would evacuating them put first responders at risk?
  • Is there a better use for the land?

Developer’s Entire Property Likely Under Water During Harvey

Benders Landing Estates (BLE) is currently the southern extent of development in the triangle bounded by Spring Creek, the San Jacinto West Fork and the Grand Parkway. Several of the southernmost homes in BLE flooded during Harvey.

From there, the Ryko land drops 30 feet in elevation to the confluence of Spring Creek and the West Fork. So, it stands to reason that virtually everything on Ryko’s land flooded, too.

FEMA’s Base Flood Elevation Viewer shows that in a 500-year flood, land at the southern end of Ryko’s property near the confluence of Spring Creek and the West Fork would be under 25 feet of water. And at the northern end, higher land would be under 7 feet.

Flood height above land near confluence of Spring Creek and West Fork. From FEMA Base Flood Elevation Viewer.

Would Such Flooding Be Survivable?

At the deeper end of Ryko’s property, such a flood might not be survivable. Look at what that much water did to the townhomes in Forest Cove a little more than a mile downstream from Ryko.

Forest Cove Townhomes
Townhomes cut in half by Harvey’s floodwaters. Photo: September 14, 2017.

Close up, the damage looked like this.

Riverview townhome
Forest Cove Townhome destroyed by Harvey.

Of course, damage at the higher elevations on Ryko’s land would not be as severe. Whether Ryko’s residents could survive would depend on how deep in the floodplain they lived and whether they could evacuate before floodwaters rose.

One resident of Benders Landing Estates told me of helicopter rescues during Harvey.

Comments on this social media post during Harvey went on for five pages.

If BLE residents had to be rescued by helicopter, imagine the logistics of rescuing thousands more deeper in the floodplain.

Assuming an average population density of about 2.5 people per household, Ryko’s 7,000 homes could hold 17,500 people.

Rescuing that many residents by helicopter would be an air traffic control nightmare…especially in heavy weather with limited visibility.

Putting First Responders at Risk

Harvey’s floodwaters rose at night as people were sleeping…without warning or time to evacuate. A few miles downstream, a dozen people died as a result of injuries sustained during evacuation by boat. A first responder told me that HFD estimated the West Fork water speed at 22 MPH. That’s dangerous!

Clearly, there are no good ways to rescue that many people when floodwaters rise that high next time.

Is There a Better Use for the Land?

Yes. This land would make an ideal park. And we already have an ideal model in the nearby Lake Houston Wilderness Park. Both areas:

  • Are roughly similar in size.
  • Lie between major streams
  • Are unsafe to develop.
  • Flood regularly.
  • Host a variety of wildlife including bald eagles.
The natural solution to flooding: park land.

If wilderness floods, it won’t endanger people or property. When water recedes, life goes back to normal without:

  • Presidential disaster declarations
  • Congressional appropriations
  • Bankrupting the national flood insurance program
  • Decades of flood-mitigation grants and rebuilding efforts.

To end on a positive note, parks enhance home values for humans. Multiple studies have shown that proximity to parks enhances the value of homes.

Perhaps it’s time for Ryko to recognize that developing this land is too risky. Doing so would open themselves up to multi-million dollar lawsuits if people died in a flood…especially after they were warned by Montgomery County that developing the land was unsafe.

In my opinion, Ryko should put a reasonable price on the property that lets the State, County and/or City turn the land into a park. Then everyone could win and walk away whole.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/7/25

2808 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Montgomery County Engineering Letter Blasts Ryko’s Drainage Study

5/6/25 – ReduceFlooding has obtained an uncharacteristically blunt letter via a Freedom of Information Act request to Montgomery County’s Engineering Department. The letter blasts Ryko’s Drainage Study for its proposed 5,500-acre development deep in the floodplains near the confluence of four major streams across US59 from Kingwood.

Base map from Ryko Drainage Study. Emphasis added to property boundary (red) and stream names for readability. Shades of blue show floodways and floodplains.

Overview of Drainage Study Objections

The letter, which brims with frustration, strongly objects to Ryko’s Preliminary Drainage Impact Study based on safety concerns. It then lectures Ryko’s engineers about their responsibility to protect the public and goes on to address seven specific concerns.

The author of the letter has since left the Montgomery County Engineering Department after James Noack, who was Montgomery County Precinct 3 Commissioner at the time, reportedly objected to the letter’s objections.

Letter Later Rescinded

A month later, Montgomery County’s Director of Engineering Services sent a second letter to Ryko’s engineers. The terse, three-sentence letter rescinded the first letter and said that the head county engineer would re-review the drainage study.

Montgomery County did not supply any additional details regarding the re-review. Nor did it supply the drainage study submitted by Ryko (although I separately received a copy from Harris County).

Noack was voted out of office last year and replaced by a new Precinct 3 Commissioner, Ritch Wheeler. In a town hall meeting last month, Wheeler said he tried to buy the land from Ryko, but the company wanted an outrageous sum of money for it – more than four times the appraised value. Harris County also reportedly tried to buy the land, but could not afford Ryko’s price either.

Litany of Safety Objections

The first letter to Ryko’s engineers is a classic for its lack of ambiguity. It states that the deceased County Engineer, Dan Wilds, “provided a considerable amount of objection to this development over the years.”

“The most obvious objection,” it continues, “being that that this proposed development is located at the confluence of four major streams: Turkey Creek and Cypress Creek, Cypress Creek and Spring Creek, and finally Spring Creek and the West Fork of the San Jacinto River.”

“Given both the history of this development and a sincere concern for the safety of the public, I can in no way approve this preliminary drainage study nor should anyone as the risk is too high.”

Red and underlined emphasis was in original letter.

The letter then reminds the two engineers for Ryko of their responsibilities under Section 137.55 of the Texas Board of Professional Engineers and Land Surveyors (TBPELS). The regulations outline the duty of engineers to protect the public by ensuring their work does not endanger health, safety, property, or welfare. This includes preventing unsafe practices.

The letter concludes with a litany of concerns about the drainage impact study and the proposed development. The last concern states, “The County Engineer’s office believes that any development in the subject area, at the confluence of Spring Creek and the San Jacinto River, will be at a higher risk of flooding during extreme events and thus should be avoided.”

To See the Original Letters

For a printable PDF of the first letter, click here. For the second letter rescinding the first letter, click here.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/6/25

2807 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

If any responsible parties have opposing or additional points of view on this subject, I will be happy to publish them.

Proposed Federal Rule Change to Endangered Species Act Could Make Floodplain Development Easier

5/5/25 – A proposed Federal rule change by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) concerning threatened and endangered species could make floodplain development easier.

Changing Definition of ‘Take’

The rule change would limit the Endangered Species Act’s power to protect habitat by deleting the word ‘harm’ from the explanation of what it means to ‘take’ a member of an endangered species.

The definition (page 3, paragraph 12) says, “The term ‘take’ means to harass, harm, pursue, hunt, shoot, wound, kill, trap, capture, or collect, or to attempt to engage in any such conduct.”

‘Harm’ is the only word in that definition applying to habitat. As NPR reported, “For decades, federal agencies have interpreted ‘harm’ broadly, to include actions that modify or degrade habitats in ways that impair endangered species’ ability to feed, breed or find shelter.”

And in the north Houston area, floodplains provide prime habitat.

Bald Eagle over the West Fork San Jacinto in Kingwood.

Many environmentalists point to habitat loss as the major cause of species loss. They also point to habitat protection as the reason for animals, such as bald eagles, being removed recently from the Endangered Species List.

But if the proposed rule change is adopted, only actions that directly hurt or kill actual animals, not the habitats they rely on, would remain covered by the act.

And that could make floodplain development easier because many threatened and endangered species live near water, imposing additional burdens on developers.

Why the Proposed Change?

The Federal Register says, “The existing regulatory definition of ‘harm,’ which includes habitat modification, runs contrary to the best meaning of the statutory term ‘take.’” 

But the definition of ‘take’ has included ‘harm’ for 50+ years. So, clearly this rule change is politically motivated. And in fact, this is the USFWS’s response to Executive Order 14192 of January 31, 2025.

The introduction to the executive order states that the “ever-expanding morass of complicated Federal regulation imposes massive costs on the lives of millions of Americans, creates a substantial restraint on our economic growth and ability to build and innovate, and hampers our global competitiveness.”

Any Change Would Not Be Immediate

Congressman Dan Crenshaw’s office provided this map showing the nine steps necessary in adopting such a rule change.

For a full-size, printable version, click here. The original doc is two pages wide in landscape orientation. It also contains explanatory pages on each step.

We are in the early stages of this process.

People born before the Endangered Species Act became law in 1973 may remember the precipitous loss of bald eagle habitat. They may also remember how protection of that habitat helped bring the species back. At one point, there were fewer than 500 nesting pairs in the entire lower 48 states – an estimated 99.5% population collapse.

It’s unclear how the change of this definition in the Endangered Species Act will affect eagles. Eagles are no longer on the endangered species list. But they are protected under other laws, such as the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act, also administered by USFWS.

Impact in the San Jacinto Watershed, Floodplains

The Endangered Species Act has hugely affected the oil and gas industry, mining, and land development – all staples of the local economy. So, locally, opinions on this proposed rule change may be sharply divided.

But we also should recognize that many people choose to live in the north Houston area because of the proximity to nature and the abundant wildlife found here. Some of it has survived for the last 50 years because of the Endangered Species Act.

A case in point would be the bald eagle, which can be seen regularly along the shores of the San Jacinto. And where Ryko is planning on building 7,000 homes on 5,500 acres just upstream from Kingwood.

How Do You Feel?

If you would like to add your voice to this debate, here are instructions for submitting a public comment. The page also includes a lengthy discussion of pros and cons from different points of view.

The Federal Register indicates that the public comment period on the proposed rule change will remain open through May 19, 2025. So far, people have submitted more than 26,000 comments.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/5/25

2806 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Ask Sen. Creighton to Support Lake Houston Dredging District Bill

5/4/25 – A bill by State Rep. Charles Cunningham (HB 1532) that would create a Lake Houston Dredging District has passed overwhelmingly in the House and moved to the Senate. The bill received 114 Yeas and 19 Nays in the House, but has yet to pick up traction in the Senate.

Perhaps no other bill is as important to the future of NE Harris County as this one. Please contact Senator Brandon Creighton who represents the Lake Houston area and ask him to sponsor HB1532 in the Senate.

dredging
Dredge used in Emergency West Fork Dredging program by Army Corps after Harvey

What HB1532 Would Do

Here is the engrossed version of HB1532. Engrossed means that it incorporates amendments added to the bill in the House before passage. So, it is the latest version as of this writing.

Lake Houston supplies water for more than 2 million people in the Houston region. But sediment buildups from sand mines and new development upstream continue to plague it. And that, in turn has contributed to widespread flooding.

Such sediment buildups have reduced the capacity of Lake Houston by almost 10% as the region’s population has grown by more than 500%.

Texas Water Development Board and US Census Bureau

While dredging since Hurricane Harvey has helped remove some of the sediment in the headwaters of the lake, we need a long-term, ongoing maintenance program to address new sediment that continues to come downstream with ever major rain.

The Committee Substitute of HB 1532 seeks to address this issue by creating the Lake Houston Dredging and Maintenance District. It will provide dredging and maintenance operations in the area that improve water flow and reduce sediment buildup.

A five-person board would govern the district:

  • One director appointed by the Houston City Council
  • Two appointed by Houston Public Works
  • One appointed by the Mayor
  • One appointed Harris County Commissioners Court

Dredging could take place only in Harris County; Montgomery County is not affected. The Lake itself; East and West Forks of the San Jacinto; Luce Bayou; and Caney Creek are all in bounds.

The District could also sign inter-local agreements with cities such as Humble, to address sediment in its channels that lead to the lake. However, the District could not charge other entities for the dredging it does under such inter-local agreements.

Provisions in the bill prohibit the District from degrading water quality in the Lake. And the District would have to obtain permission from Houston Public Works before doing any dredging.

Financing

The District could NOT levy taxes or charge a fee. But it could issue bonds secured by district revenue.

The bill authorizes the legislature to fund the district’s activities but caps appropriations at $25 million per fiscal year until September 1, 2027.

The bill requires the District to study methods of financing and to make the study’s results available to the public. Early talk around financing focused on beneficial uses of sediment removed from the lake and its tributaries.

For instance, the District could sell the spoils to developers who need to raise slabs or build up areas. Spoils could also be used in projects such as the Ike Dike or road improvements.

Please Help

HB 1532 does not:

  • Raise taxes
  • Levy fees
  • Affect people outside of Harris County

HB 1532 would:

  • Make the people and businesses of the Lake Houston area safer
  • Help restore the capacity of Lake Houston and its tributaries
  • Enhance the water security of the region
  • Reduce flooding
  • Fuel economic development
  • Help avoid economic disruptions, such as we experienced after Harvey.

As long as surrounding counties keep sending sediment downstream, the least they can do is support HB 1532.

Please email Senator Brandon Creighton or call his office at (512) 463-0104. Please ask him to sponsor HB 1532 in the Senate. It will only take a minute!

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/4/25

2805 Days since Hurricane Harvey

Unintended Consequences of Legislation Could Increase Flood Risk

5/3/25 – A well-intentioned bill that just moved from the Texas House to the Senate could have dire unintended consequences in certain circumstances. One of the unintended consequences is increased flood risk.

State Capitol Building of Texas
State Capitol Building in Austin. Your future flood risk could depend on what happens here.

Bill Purports to Make Housing More Affordable

HB23 (and nearly identical companion bills SB2354 and HB2977) give developers the ability to privately hire engineers to approve the developer’s plans as a substitute for review by cities or counties. The intention: to speed up approvals of everything from plats to permits, thus lowering the costs of housing.

However, the bills are also a recipe for conflict of interest. It doesn’t take much imagination to see why. Moreover…

  • Corners could be cut that endanger public safety.
  • Neighbors would have no way to protest new developments that could adversely affect their property values.

And that’s only one barrel of the shotgun. The second barrel? Potential interaction with a law passed in 2023.

Changing Plats Already Approved

In 2023, the legislature gave developers the right to opt out of a city’s Extra Territorial Jurisdiction (ETJ). Once a developer, such as Ryko has left the ETJ, it could change plats at will with the developer’s hired gun running the show. And nearby homeowners would have no recourse or even an opportunity to protest.

  • Land once promised as parks could be turned into apartments.
  • Forests could be leveled.
  • High-density development could clog quiet residential streets.
  • Increased stormwater runoff could increase flood risk.

The combination of HB23 and the 2023 ETJ law would remove governmental accountability and oversight from development. It would be like going to a basketball game without referees. The results might not be so pretty.

Homes could flood repeatedly because assumptions about floodplains and flood elevations fundamentally changed without oversight.

HB23 purports to make housing more affordable. But it also fundamentally changes the balance of power between developers, neighbors and government. It takes government out of the equation, leaving neighbors without protection.

An Amendment Could Help

If HB23 survives the Senate, at a minimum, the Senate needs to add language to HB23 (or one of its companion bills) that prevents developers from bypassing government reviews for plats and re-plats by removing their land from a city’s ETJ. 

If a developer wants to re-plat land, that’s fine. But make them go through a government review that lets adjoining property owners and their HOAs have their voices heard.

As it stands, HB23 and its companion bills stifle protest.

The bills would also make government unaccountable.

How You Can Help

At this point in the legislative session, it looks like HB23 has a better chance of success than its companion bills. I am against HB23 and its companion bills as they stand.

At a bare minimum, they need to include amendments that preclude re-platting land without government approval.

If you agree, during the next commercial break email the authors of these bills: 

And don’t forget Governor Greg Abbott.

Legislation should create predictable outcomes, not unintended consequences.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/3/25

2804 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

Median Madness Event Rained Out, Will Be Rescheduled

5/2/25 – Because of heavy rains on Friday, City Council Member Fred Flickinger’s Median Madness event on Saturday 5/3/25 has been cancelled and will be rescheduled. A new date is not yet available.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/2/25 at 10 PM

2802 Days since Hurricane Harvey

NWS Publishes 2025 Hurricane Guide Tailored for SE Texas

The National Weather Service in Houston has published a 2025 Hurricane Guide tailored for the southeast Texas area. The guide includes information about how to prepare for all hazards associated with hurricanes, including strong winds, storm surge, flooding, and tornadoes.

The 38-page guide is filled with helpful tips, explanatory visuals, checklists, evacuation routes, easy-to-read text and helpful links. Whether you grew up in the area or recently arrived, this guide contains updated information for you.

Bolivar after Ike
Destruction on Bolivar Peninsula After Hurricane Ike
Contents

The guide begins with lists of hurricane names for this and the next four years and a readiness checklist. Next, it discusses changes to familiar National Hurricane Center graphics, including a new 2025 look for forecast cone graphics.

For boaters and beachgoers, the brochure contains a discussion of hurricane surf and rip currents, and why even distant hurricanes can be deadly.

One of the most eye-opening sections discussed how storm surge from Category 1, 3 and 5 hurricanes would affect communities from the Bolivar Peninsula to Matagorda Bay. I was shocked to see that surge from a Cat 5 storm could reach inside Loop 610 through the bayous and up to the Lake Houston Dam.

Next came a series of preparation tips for people who live and work in different types of structures. They include but are not limited to recommendations for:

  • Protecting vital records
  • Pet safety
  • Insurance (before and after the storm)
  • Emergency contacts
  • Supply kits
  • Time-sensitive checklists:
    • Actions to take when a storm is in the Gulf
    • Final actions to take if leaving
    • Final actions to take if staying
  • Where to find forecast/emergency information
  • Tourist safety

The guide concludes with sections on:

  • How people with special needs or disabilities can register for assistance
  • Evacuation routes
  • Evacuation zones by zip code
  • Returning home
  • Cleanup
  • Emergency management contacts for counties and cities throughout the region

Start Now

This is a great all-in-one guide. You can download the English version here. Or the Spanish version here.

Remember, hurricane season starts in less than a month and storms may strike even before then.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/2/25 with thanks to NWS/Houston.

2803 Days since Hurricane Harvey

May 2025 San Jacinto West Fork Dredging Update

5/1/2025 – My last dredging update was in April. So it’s time for another.

Judging by aerial photos, Callan Marine seems to be making steady progress in its San Jacinto West Fork dredging program for the City of Houston. The dredge has moved farther downstream. And the placement area in Huffman next to the Luce Bayou Inter-Basin Transfer Canal is filling up.

The Story in Pictures

dredge-plan for west fork
In April, the dredge was located west of #4. Yesterday it ws working between #4 and #5.
Looking S toward Lake Houston from above West Fork. Note dredge in distance near tip of Kings Point (left).
Closer shot shows dredge pipe that pumps spoils to placement area far upstream.
Men worked on the giant dredge bit as I photographed the scene.
From there, spoils travel 3.8 miles to the placement area up Luce Bayou near the Inter-Basin Transfer Canal.
West Fork Dredging Spoils Placement Area near Luce IBT Canal (left). Pipe near tree line on left brings water/sediment from lake.
Reverse angle shows compartments in maze that slows down incoming water. As water slows, sediment drops out of suspension. Eventually, this will form a base strong and high enough to build homes on.
Already, parts of the placement area are solid enough to support heavy equipment. The area shown above on the left has reached the height of the dike walls.

Note how the workers are building out and into the placement area in two directions. They adjust the length and position of the pipes to concentrate the flow where they want to build up the earth. From there, the bulldozers and excavators help compact the material into a solid foundation for beneficial use.

This image shows the height of the sediment relative to the walls of the pond. Several vertical feet remain in most of the placement area.
After most of the sediment has dropped out of suspension, water returns to the lake via the temporary canal (center).

Status of Cunningham’s Dredging Bill in Austin

Since Hurricane Harvey, we’ve spent hundreds of millions of dollars on dredging to play catch up from decades of neglect.

Moving sediment deposited in Lake Houston by erosion is a massive, but necessary project. The lake supplies water for more than 2 million people and has already lost a large percentage of its storage capacity.

That’s why House Bill 1532 by Rep. Charles Cunningham is so important. The bill would create a permanent dredging and maintenance district for the lake.

Dredging also reduces flood risk by restoring conveyance and eliminating sediment blockages.

On April 29, 2025, the House approved HB1532 overwhelmingly. 114 representatives voted for it. 19 voted against. Two voted Present. And one abstained.

Yesterday, the bill moved to the Senate on its slalom through the legislature. You may want to urge Sen. Brandon Creighton to support it.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 5/1/25

2802 Days since Hurricane Harvey