2/26/26 – Exactly 8.5 years ago this week, the entire Lake Houston Area faced an existential threat by the name of Hurricane Harvey. Harvey killed 12 people in Kingwood Town Center, and flooded more than 16,000 homes and 3,300 businesses here.
In my opinion, we can’t let that happen again. We need to find ways to reduce flood risk before the next killer flood. That will take political solutions. And we need people with a firm grasp of the issues who have the desire, skills, and energy to make them real.
I-69 and Townsen during Harvey
Importance of Voting in PRIMARIES
Unfortunately, few citizens vote in primaries. So, a small group of extremists funded by outsiders with other interests can limit your choices in November. Those extremists vote in high numbers and can easily influence the outcomes in primaries that have multiple candidates. And that’s why it’s important to vote NOW.
The last day for early voting is Friday, February 27. If you haven’t voted by then, your last chance will be Election Day on March 3, 2026.
Below are my personal recommendations in three key, contested races.
Congressional District 2: Dan Crenshaw
As the community sought ways to reduce future flood risk after Harvey, a freshman Congressman named Dan Crenshaw rose to the challenge perhaps more than anyone at that point. He secured hundreds of millions of dollars for dredging, adding more floodgates to the Lake Houston Dam, and upstream detention. Not all of those projects are complete yet. But the money is waiting and projects are moving along.
In a neighboring congressional district to the east (CD-9), Alex Mealer faces a challenge from Briscoe Cain. Mealer is a West Point grad who commanded a company of 600+ people in Afghanistan and earned a Bronze Star. She also has MBA and JD degrees from Harvard. Plus, she has President Trump’s endorsement. And finally, she has spent days with me scouting flood issues in the Lake Houston Area and upstream. The woman is a force of nature. Strong. Brilliant. Energetic. Informed. And ready to step into the job.
I don’t live in CD9, but if I did, I would vote for Mealer. The Lake Houston Dam is in her new Congressional District.
Harris County Judge: Marty Lancton
The race for Harris County Judge is also a critical for the Lake Houston Area. We’ve seen how Judge Lina Hidalgo starved the Lake Houston Area of flood-mitigation funding and our rightful share of the 2018 flood bond. We had the worst flooding in the county and have come in almost dead last in funding compared to other watersheds in the county.
Graph compiled from: Harris County Flood Control District Year-End 2025 reported bond spending and budget allocations advertised with 2018 flood bond.
Republicans have many good choices to replace Hidalgo in this race. On balance, though, I feel Marty Lancton is the best choice. He also has the best chance of getting elected in November.
Lancton leads an army of 20,000 first responders state wide. And he knows flooding first-hand from the standpoint of a person who has evacuated victims on his back and in lifeboats.
It’s one thing to understand problems intellectually and another to feel the shock-and-awe of Mother Nature for days on end as you repeatedly put your own life on the line to help fellow human beings you never met. I promise you, flood mitigation is a high priority for Lancton.
Lancton can draw support from both sides of the aisle in a way that perhaps other candidates cannot. And that makes him electable in the general election still nine months away. Among Republican candidates, he uniquely stands out. He is a lifelong Republican, endorsed by Governor Greg Abbott. Yet the firefighters union also elected him as its leader. And he knows how Austin works. He has lobbied there on behalf of first responders for years and knows all the key members.
You may disagree with my choices or have different priorities. That’s fine. But please vote. It’s important that YOU make the decision instead of some out-of-state super-PAC. Many have invisible donors representing hidden interests fighting against YOUR interests. Don’t let them limit your choices in November with patriotic sounding names.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/26/26
3103 Days since Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/TS-Harvey-8-30-17-209.jpg?fit=1024%2C768&ssl=17681024adminadmin2026-02-26 18:22:012026-02-26 21:44:53The Importance of Voting in Primaries
2/25/26 – According to Precinct 3 Director of Engineering Eric Heppen, P.E., PMP, Harris County has issued a cease-and-desist order to the owner of property in the Cedar Bayou floodplain where TXDoT contractors were depositing dirt excavated from the Luce Bayou watershed.
Dirt excavated in upper left was being trucked to Cedar Bayou floodplain in massive quantities.One of two truck lines at excavation site. Approximately 20 dump trucks were filling up at detention basin under construction adjacent to FM2100. From there, a parade of the trucks deposited it in the Cedar Bayou Floodplain before making another round trip.
Precinct 3 Project Manager Jason Hains said trucks stopped depositing the fill yesterday afternoon, 2/24/25. Nearby residents say they did not see trucks entering or leaving the property today.
TXDoT Comment
One reader, Chris Summers, who complained directly to TXDoT received this reply this afternoon from TXDoT’s North Harris Assistant Area Engineer Nyemb Nyemb, PE. Mr. Nyemb said, “Our construction and environmental teams are looking into it now. We also have a meeting with Harris County tomorrow and will address this matter with them directly. TXDoT contractors are required to comply with all applicable floodplain and environmental regulations, and any confirmed violations will be corrected.”
Summers, who reported the illegal dumping, said, “TXDoT may not have known where their fill dirt was going, but should have.”
Violation of Harris County Floodplain Regulations
The fill operation violated Harris County Floodplain Regulations adopted by Commissioners Court in 2019 in response to Hurricane Harvey. During Harvey, almost half of the Harris County homes flooded were outside of any known floodplain. In part, that’s because of the cumulative impact of such unauthorized dumping during almost twenty years since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001. And that’s a large part of the reason why Section 4.07(e) now says:
“Any reduction in floodplain storage or conveyance capacity within the 0.2 percent or 500‐year floodplain must be offset with a hydraulically equivalent (one‐to‐one) volume of mitigation sufficient to offset the reduction. The reduction may result from development or the placement of fill within the 0.2% floodplain or 500‐year floodplain.”
“Such mitigation shall be within the same watershed and shall be provided on the same property or within the same hydrologic sub‐watershed or at an alternate site meeting the approval of the County Engineer. A full hydrological and hydraulic analysis must be submitted to support a request for mitigation outside the boundaries of the property being developed. This requirement does not apply to Coastal Areas where floodplain fill mitigation is not an issue.”
What Property Owner Must Do
According to both Heppen and Hains, the owner of the property in the floodplain must:
Stop accepting fill
Come up with a plan to remove fill already deposited there.
That’s going to be a big order. The fill reached treetop level in places and covered approximately six acres.
Reportedly, the owner did not plan to build anything on the dirt, but planned to sell it. He referred to the dirt as “temporary.”
But Heppen emphasized that that still did not relieve the owner of the need to develop a mitigation plan, which he did not do. Nor did it relieve him of the burden of acquiring a permit, which he did not have.
Loss of Floodplain Storage Incremental and Cumulative
Heppen emphasized that the loss of floodplain storage is incremental and cumulative.
He referred to the displacement of floodwaters. For every cubic yard you place in the floodway, that’s one less cubic yard for the storage of floodwaters.
“That’s why it’s prohibited,” Heppen said. “If enough people do it, eventually you erase the safety margin above the floodplain for surrounding homes.”
Heppen thanked readers for bringing this to the County’s attention and for filing complaints.
Could State Criminalize Such Behavior?
Heppen also said that the county may work with the state next year to pass a law against such fill activity. The thought: to make such dumping a criminal, not a civil offense. That changes the whole “What if I get caught?” equation. Instead of a slap-on-the-wrist fine, a criminal record might disqualify someone from getting future jobs.
Passing such a law would surely be an uphill battle. But that also speaks to the widespread nature of the problem.
One other engineer I talked to suggested, “The problem is going on all over Harris County.” Another said, “It puts everyone at risk.”
If You See Such Dumping…
If you see a recurrence of such dumping here or anywhere in Harris County, please report it to me. I’ll help document it and get it to the proper authorities.
They prohibit the addition of fill to floodplains without 1:1 compensatory mitigation in the same floodplain, and preferably on the same property.
It’s OK for people to excavate a pond or detention basin on their property, and use the excavated dirt to elevate other parts of their property. The golden rule: Just don’t bring fill INTO a Harris County floodplain.”
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/25/26
3102 Days since Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/DJI_20260223133344_0235_D.jpg?fit=1100%2C619&ssl=16191100adminadmin2026-02-25 18:31:432026-02-25 21:13:36Harris County Shuts Down Fill Operation in Cedar Bayou Floodplain
2/22/2026 – After researching more than 3,000 articles about flooding since Hurricane Harvey, I’ve concluded that we’re on a flood-mitigation treadmill. In other words, we run like crazy and do not get very far. Even worse, we can’t get off the treadmill.
Most of those 3,000 articles can be divided into two groups: things that increase flood risk and things that decrease it. Preventing things that increase flood risk typically costs one-fourth to one-seventh the cost of decreasing risk after a flood.
So, why are we stuck on this endless flood-mitigation treadmill? Why do we prefer expensive, after-the-fact solutions. And why don’t we actively enforce regulations already on the books that proactively reduce flood risk and prevent damage at a far lower cost?
Before we get to the reasons, first we must understand that flood risk is not static. Every little change to the landscape affects it.
Flood-Risk Changing Constantly
Flood-risk changes in barely visible increments, gradually over time. But all of those changes are incremental. And flooding happens infrequently. So, most people don’t wake up to the increased flood risk until it’s too late. At that point, the fixes have astronomical price tags. Two high-level examples:
Rivers can become clogged with sediment from mining and construction. That reduces their capacity to handle high-water events safely. Dredging can offset that increased risk, but has cost hundreds of millions of dollars.
Sometimes, upstream developments don’t sufficiently control their runoff. That makes flood peaks build higher and faster downstream. To offset those increased peaks, we must often widen channels downstream. And that may require buyouts that take decades more.
In general, after people finally recognize the need for mitigation, we must:
Build the case for fixes
Estimate their cost
Compare costs and benefits
Build political consensus across local, county, state and federal governments
Get an act of Congress passed and signed by the President
Win scarce grants
Get bids
Mobilize contractors.
And that’s all before we even begin to address the risk created by:
Someone upstream who decided to game the system for profit
Regulators who didn’t enforce regulations
Maintenance deferred for decades or perpetually ignored.
Staggering Costs
The costs can be staggering:
In Harris County, we passed a $2.5 billion flood bond in 2018. Some estimated the real need at $60 billion. That’s why we spend so much time seeking matching funds at the federal level, such as the hundreds of millions of dollars that Rep. Dan Crenshaw helped secure for dredging.
The 2024 Texas State Flood Plan showed that six million Texans live in floodplains – about one in five of us. The cost of mitigating their flood risk totals $54.5 billion. But so far, we’ve only allocated $1.4 billion to the job.
At the Federal level, we spend an average of about $10 billion per year on flooding. But that amount can vary radically when we get hit with massive storms like Harvey or Helene. Harvey caused $125 billion in damages in Harris County alone.
Losing Ground
Between floods, we seem to forget their destructive power. So, we keep building in floodplains and wetlands which just exacerbates the problem. For example:
The Signorelli Company (a real-estate developer) fought for 10 years all the way to the Texas Supreme Court for the right to build in the East Fork floodplain.
Ron Holley Development also wants to build homes in the floodplain of the East Fork, not far from Signorelli
Scarborough is trying to develop thousands of homes on 5,300 acres near the confluence of the San Jacinto West Fork with Spring and Cypress Creeks, one of the worst areas for flooding in the region.
Colony Ridge didn’t exist 15 years ago and is now 50% larger than Manhattan. Evidence suggests the developer didn’t sufficiently detain runoff. Plus much of the development was built over wetlands.
We also keep dumping more fill in floodplains, floodways, and streams that creates a bathtub effect. There’s simply less room for floodwater.
TXDoT contractors are dumping dirt excavated from the FM2100 expansion project into the floodplain of Cedar Bayou near Huffman ISD schools.
Arrest warrants have been issued for the owner of land near Savelle and Sorters-McClellan Roads for putting massive amounts of fill in the floodplain and floodway of the San Jacinto West Fork. That’s right across the river from the Scarborough property.
Cedar Bayou floodplain fill by TXDoT contractor. I saw a dozen trucks dump their loads in 20 minutes.Will we pay to move it twice?Illegal fill in West Fork floodway and floodplain.Who will remove it?Owner has vanished.
Such abuses are typically committed by people who ignore the law to make a buck. Regulators should have prevented such abuses. But they rarely do; that encourages more abuses. And that forces us to deal with correcting them after the fact.
Eight and a half years after Harvey, it seems we are into full-on willful blindness.
Why We Take the Expensive Route
Collectively, we tend to spend on visible crises. That’s easier than root-cause modification.
Crying babies and devastated families deserve our help. But enforcing regulations and fining people on a construction site? That’s politically dangerous.
And that, in a sentence, explains why Americans continue to spend billions each year to fix preventable flooding.We have a systemic tendency to:
Respond vigorously to visible crises
Underinvest in politically difficult structural reforms
Externalize downstream remediation costs while privatizing upstream profits.
Until we grapple with this issue, we will never get off the flood-mitigation treadmill.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/24/2026
3101 Days since Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/20170829-IMG_9819.jpg?fit=1200%2C900&ssl=19001200adminadmin2026-02-24 19:56:132026-02-25 12:16:58Editorial: The Flood-Mitigation Treadmill
The Importance of Voting in Primaries
2/26/26 – Exactly 8.5 years ago this week, the entire Lake Houston Area faced an existential threat by the name of Hurricane Harvey. Harvey killed 12 people in Kingwood Town Center, and flooded more than 16,000 homes and 3,300 businesses here.
In my opinion, we can’t let that happen again. We need to find ways to reduce flood risk before the next killer flood. That will take political solutions. And we need people with a firm grasp of the issues who have the desire, skills, and energy to make them real.
Importance of Voting in PRIMARIES
Unfortunately, few citizens vote in primaries. So, a small group of extremists funded by outsiders with other interests can limit your choices in November. Those extremists vote in high numbers and can easily influence the outcomes in primaries that have multiple candidates. And that’s why it’s important to vote NOW.
Below are my personal recommendations in three key, contested races.
Congressional District 2: Dan Crenshaw
As the community sought ways to reduce future flood risk after Harvey, a freshman Congressman named Dan Crenshaw rose to the challenge perhaps more than anyone at that point. He secured hundreds of millions of dollars for dredging, adding more floodgates to the Lake Houston Dam, and upstream detention. Not all of those projects are complete yet. But the money is waiting and projects are moving along.
In contrast, Crenshaw’s opponent in the current primary did little to help. He voted against a bill to create a Lake Houston Dredging and Maintenance District. He did nothing to rein in sedimentation from upstream sand mines in his Texas House district. And he argued to let children’s camps, like Camp Mystic, continue to build in floodplains.
I voted for Crenshaw.
Congressional District 9: Alex Mealer
In a neighboring congressional district to the east (CD-9), Alex Mealer faces a challenge from Briscoe Cain. Mealer is a West Point grad who commanded a company of 600+ people in Afghanistan and earned a Bronze Star. She also has MBA and JD degrees from Harvard. Plus, she has President Trump’s endorsement. And finally, she has spent days with me scouting flood issues in the Lake Houston Area and upstream. The woman is a force of nature. Strong. Brilliant. Energetic. Informed. And ready to step into the job.
Briscoe Cain, her opponent, also voted against a Lake Houston Area Dredging District this year (HB 1532), even though it wouldn’t have raised taxes. He also did not vote for the so-called “Ike Dike” bill (HB 1089). Finally, as a state representative, Cain presided over the growth of Colony Ridge in his district. It got so big and so bad that the entire Texas Republican Congressional Delegation demanded an investigation of the controversial development.
I don’t live in CD9, but if I did, I would vote for Mealer. The Lake Houston Dam is in her new Congressional District.
Harris County Judge: Marty Lancton
The race for Harris County Judge is also a critical for the Lake Houston Area. We’ve seen how Judge Lina Hidalgo starved the Lake Houston Area of flood-mitigation funding and our rightful share of the 2018 flood bond. We had the worst flooding in the county and have come in almost dead last in funding compared to other watersheds in the county.
Graph compiled from: Harris County Flood Control District Year-End 2025 reported bond spending and budget allocations advertised with 2018 flood bond.
Republicans have many good choices to replace Hidalgo in this race. On balance, though, I feel Marty Lancton is the best choice. He also has the best chance of getting elected in November.
Lancton leads an army of 20,000 first responders state wide. And he knows flooding first-hand from the standpoint of a person who has evacuated victims on his back and in lifeboats.
It’s one thing to understand problems intellectually and another to feel the shock-and-awe of Mother Nature for days on end as you repeatedly put your own life on the line to help fellow human beings you never met. I promise you, flood mitigation is a high priority for Lancton.
Lancton can draw support from both sides of the aisle in a way that perhaps other candidates cannot. And that makes him electable in the general election still nine months away. Among Republican candidates, he uniquely stands out. He is a lifelong Republican, endorsed by Governor Greg Abbott. Yet the firefighters union also elected him as its leader. And he knows how Austin works. He has lobbied there on behalf of first responders for years and knows all the key members.
I have endorsed Lancton.
Vote Even If You Disagree With My Recommendations
You may disagree with my choices or have different priorities. That’s fine. But please vote. It’s important that YOU make the decision instead of some out-of-state super-PAC. Many have invisible donors representing hidden interests fighting against YOUR interests. Don’t let them limit your choices in November with patriotic sounding names.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/26/26
3103 Days since Harvey
Harris County Shuts Down Fill Operation in Cedar Bayou Floodplain
2/25/26 – According to Precinct 3 Director of Engineering Eric Heppen, P.E., PMP, Harris County has issued a cease-and-desist order to the owner of property in the Cedar Bayou floodplain where TXDoT contractors were depositing dirt excavated from the Luce Bayou watershed.
Precinct 3 Project Manager Jason Hains said trucks stopped depositing the fill yesterday afternoon, 2/24/25. Nearby residents say they did not see trucks entering or leaving the property today.
TXDoT Comment
One reader, Chris Summers, who complained directly to TXDoT received this reply this afternoon from TXDoT’s North Harris Assistant Area Engineer Nyemb Nyemb, PE. Mr. Nyemb said, “Our construction and environmental teams are looking into it now. We also have a meeting with Harris County tomorrow and will address this matter with them directly. TXDoT contractors are required to comply with all applicable floodplain and environmental regulations, and any confirmed violations will be corrected.”
Summers, who reported the illegal dumping, said, “TXDoT may not have known where their fill dirt was going, but should have.”
Violation of Harris County Floodplain Regulations
The fill operation violated Harris County Floodplain Regulations adopted by Commissioners Court in 2019 in response to Hurricane Harvey. During Harvey, almost half of the Harris County homes flooded were outside of any known floodplain. In part, that’s because of the cumulative impact of such unauthorized dumping during almost twenty years since Tropical Storm Allison in 2001. And that’s a large part of the reason why Section 4.07(e) now says:
“Any reduction in floodplain storage or conveyance capacity within the 0.2 percent or 500‐year floodplain must be offset with a hydraulically equivalent (one‐to‐one) volume of mitigation sufficient to offset the reduction. The reduction may result from development or the placement of fill within the 0.2% floodplain or 500‐year floodplain.”
“Such mitigation shall be within the same watershed and shall be provided on the same property or within the same hydrologic sub‐watershed or at an alternate site meeting the approval of the County Engineer. A full hydrological and hydraulic analysis must be submitted to support a request for mitigation outside the boundaries of the property being developed. This requirement does not apply to Coastal Areas where floodplain fill mitigation is not an issue.”
What Property Owner Must Do
According to both Heppen and Hains, the owner of the property in the floodplain must:
That’s going to be a big order. The fill reached treetop level in places and covered approximately six acres.
Reportedly, the owner did not plan to build anything on the dirt, but planned to sell it. He referred to the dirt as “temporary.”
But Heppen emphasized that that still did not relieve the owner of the need to develop a mitigation plan, which he did not do. Nor did it relieve him of the burden of acquiring a permit, which he did not have.
Loss of Floodplain Storage Incremental and Cumulative
Heppen emphasized that the loss of floodplain storage is incremental and cumulative.
He referred to the displacement of floodwaters. For every cubic yard you place in the floodway, that’s one less cubic yard for the storage of floodwaters.
“That’s why it’s prohibited,” Heppen said. “If enough people do it, eventually you erase the safety margin above the floodplain for surrounding homes.”
Heppen thanked readers for bringing this to the County’s attention and for filing complaints.
Could State Criminalize Such Behavior?
Heppen also said that the county may work with the state next year to pass a law against such fill activity. The thought: to make such dumping a criminal, not a civil offense. That changes the whole “What if I get caught?” equation. Instead of a slap-on-the-wrist fine, a criminal record might disqualify someone from getting future jobs.
Passing such a law would surely be an uphill battle. But that also speaks to the widespread nature of the problem.
One other engineer I talked to suggested, “The problem is going on all over Harris County.” Another said, “It puts everyone at risk.”
If You See Such Dumping…
If you see a recurrence of such dumping here or anywhere in Harris County, please report it to me. I’ll help document it and get it to the proper authorities.
They prohibit the addition of fill to floodplains without 1:1 compensatory mitigation in the same floodplain, and preferably on the same property.
It’s OK for people to excavate a pond or detention basin on their property, and use the excavated dirt to elevate other parts of their property. The golden rule: Just don’t bring fill INTO a Harris County floodplain.”
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/25/26
3102 Days since Harvey
Editorial: The Flood-Mitigation Treadmill
2/22/2026 – After researching more than 3,000 articles about flooding since Hurricane Harvey, I’ve concluded that we’re on a flood-mitigation treadmill. In other words, we run like crazy and do not get very far. Even worse, we can’t get off the treadmill.
Most of those 3,000 articles can be divided into two groups: things that increase flood risk and things that decrease it. Preventing things that increase flood risk typically costs one-fourth to one-seventh the cost of decreasing risk after a flood.
So, why are we stuck on this endless flood-mitigation treadmill? Why do we prefer expensive, after-the-fact solutions. And why don’t we actively enforce regulations already on the books that proactively reduce flood risk and prevent damage at a far lower cost?
Before we get to the reasons, first we must understand that flood risk is not static. Every little change to the landscape affects it.
Flood-Risk Changing Constantly
Flood-risk changes in barely visible increments, gradually over time. But all of those changes are incremental. And flooding happens infrequently. So, most people don’t wake up to the increased flood risk until it’s too late. At that point, the fixes have astronomical price tags. Two high-level examples:
In general, after people finally recognize the need for mitigation, we must:
And that’s all before we even begin to address the risk created by:
Staggering Costs
The costs can be staggering:
Losing Ground
Between floods, we seem to forget their destructive power. So, we keep building in floodplains and wetlands which just exacerbates the problem. For example:
We also keep dumping more fill in floodplains, floodways, and streams that creates a bathtub effect. There’s simply less room for floodwater.
Such abuses are typically committed by people who ignore the law to make a buck. Regulators should have prevented such abuses. But they rarely do; that encourages more abuses. And that forces us to deal with correcting them after the fact.
Why We Take the Expensive Route
Collectively, we tend to spend on visible crises. That’s easier than root-cause modification.
And that, in a sentence, explains why Americans continue to spend billions each year to fix preventable flooding.We have a systemic tendency to:
Until we grapple with this issue, we will never get off the flood-mitigation treadmill.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/24/2026
3101 Days since Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.