Legislative Goals Re: Sand Mining
- Establish a water quality district on the San Jacinto like the John Graves District on the Brazos.
- Key Provision #1: Moves mining outside the 100-year flood plain as permits come up for renewal.
- Why? Mining in floodway can accelerate sedimentation far above the natural rate. Sediment accumulations form dams that block river and contribute to flooding.
- Key Provision #2: Establishes performance bonds to ensure reclamation.
- Why? Some miners walk away from mines before reclamation, creating eyesores and safety hazards that discourage development in surrounding communities.
- Put teeth in TCEQ fines.
- Key Provision: Increases fines to the point where they actually discourage negative practices.
- Why? Current fines are slap on wrist. Average fine for last 7 years was about $800. Has not cleaned up industry.
- Bring best management practices for sand mining in Texas up to the standards in the rest of the country and the world.
- Key Provisions:
- Locate mines outside of floodways. (Most important)
- Establish performance bonds to cover the cost of cleanup.
- Increase the width of dikes.
- Decrease the slope of dikes.
- Control erosion with vegetation.
- Replant areas not actively being mined.
- Avoid clearing areas that will not soon be mined.
- Protect stockpiles from flooding.
- Mine only above the thalweg (deepest part of the river).
- Establish performance bonds to guarantee remediation of breaches and/or repurposing of mined areas once mining is complete
- Why? The practices where we lag the rest of the world caused the most damage during Harvey.
- Key Provisions:
- Lake Houston Area Damages
- Improving Best Management Practices
- Dangers of River Mining
- River Migration, Pit Capture, and Erosion Hazard Zones
- John Graves District: A Model for the Future of the San Jacinto
- Importance of Vegetation in Reducing Erosion
- Is There Enough Sand Outside the Floodway?
- Underappraisal of Sand Mine Properties in Montgomery County
Legislation Introduced in 2021
HB4478: Reclamation and Performance Bonds
Dan Huberty from the Lake Houston Area introduced HB4478 which addresses abandonment of sand mines. Many miners simply walk away from mines leaving abandoned, rusting equipment in place and dangerous conditions. Huberty’s bill would require mines to file a reclamation plan before they start mining and also post a bond ensuring they actually execute the plan. Currently, mines are required to file a plan, but there is no requirement in Texas to execute it. Miners can simply walk away from mines after they extract the last ounce of sand. That can leave scars on the landscape, degrade water quality, and threaten public safety.
HB767: Best Practices
Huberty also introduced HB767, a bill that would require the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to establish and publish best management practices for sand mining. However, it does not require sand mines to follow the practices. While that’s disappointing, it could bring heat to operations that don’t follow the guidelines. This bill has already been referred to the Environmental Regulation Committee where it died in the 2019 session.
HB4341: Changes Responsibility for Oversight
Representative Kyle Biederman from Fredericksburg introduced HB4341, a bill that would transfer regulation of aggregate production operations from the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) to the Texas Railroad Commission (TRRC). The bill gives the Railroad Commission the right to conduct unannounced inspections to ensure compliance with water and air quality regulations. Biederman’s bill also mandates reclamation of mines, but includes more specifics than Huberty’s. Finally, it provides criminal penalties for people who knowingly and willfully violate conditions of their permits. The big news: transfer of oversight responsibility from the TCEQ to TRRC. If it passes, it will be a resounding vote of “no confidence” in the job that the TCEQ has been doing in regulating sand mines.
HB2422: Limiting Location of Mines
Representative Erin Zwiener from Kyle introduced HB2422. Her bill applies to counties with a population of 500,000 or more. It would allow county commissioners to prohibit the construction or expansion of an aggregate production operation at a location less than one mile from a residence, school, place of worship, hospital, or land platted for residential development. The bill would also allow commissioners to establish conditions for the construction or expansion of mines elsewhere in the county.
HB291: Reclamation and Performance Bonds
Representative Andrew Murr from Kerrville introduced HB291. It also focuses on reclamation of mines. It would require the grading of banks, revegetation, and removal of equipment upon completion of mining. The bill would also require operators to reclaim mines in stages as extraction activities on different parts cease. It would give miners a deadline for reclamation, too: six months. Finally, it would require a performance bond equal to $2,500 for each acre affected by extraction activities. Upon completion of reclamation activities, the TCEQ would release the performance bond. Cities and counties would have the right to waive the reclamation requirement if reclamation conflicts with proposed future uses of the land.
HB1544: APO Taxation
Representative Ryan Guillen from Rio Grande City introduced HB1544. It addresses the tax classification of land used for sand mining. The language is confusing and an analysis of the bill has not yet been submitted. However, it appears to state that sand mine, once it meets requirements for reclamation, may revert to a property tax rate associated with open space, such as agriculture. The bill lays out some unique requirements for reclamation not discussed in the other bills here. While this seems to give sand miners a positive incentive to restore land, I’m not sure how much. In Montgomery County, the tax appraiser routinely grants ag exemptions to land used for sand mining.
HB1912/SB1209: Permit Requirements
HB1912 filed by Representative Terry Wilson of Georgetown establishes additional permit requirements for aggregate production operations. They affect air quality, light pollution, noise, blasting, dust, and other operational issues identified by the House Interim Committee on APOs back in January.
State Senator Charles Schwertner from Bryan introduced SB1209. It is an identical companion bill to HB1912. Companion bills increase the chance of passage by broadening the base of support in both houses.
Earth Week Part 3: Sand Mine Setbacks from Rivers
After a year and a half of investigating sand mining best practices around the US and the world, I concluded that Texas falls short of other states and countries on several measures. The single biggest opportunity for improvement: greater setbacks from rivers. Other states recommend from 100- to 1000-foot setbacks. Some prohibit building in floodways […]
Outlook Good for Bill That Would Double Fines for Illegal Sand Mining
On April 17th, the Texas House of Representatives Environmental Regulations committee heard testimony on a bill that would double fines for illegal sand mining, HB907. No illegal sand miners spoke against the bill, so this one has a pretty good chance of passing. Key Points in Huberty’s Testimony The bill’s author, State Representative Dan Huberty […]
Texas Parks and Wildlife Sand and Gravel Permitting Program: History, Scope and Protections
As I’ve been posting a lot about sand mining legislation, a friend sent me this doc today about the reasons for Texas Parks & Wildlife Department’s (TPWD) permitting program. TPWD regulates mining in rivers; TCEQ regulates mining in flood plains. Difference in Tax Rates Between Rivers and Flood Plains Flood plain mining has a 2% […]
Bill that Could Open Door to River Mining Modified and Heading to Full Senate
Senate Bill 2126, which allows sand mining in rivers – without permits or royalties – was voted out of the Senate Water and Rural Affairs committee last night. The committee left the bill pending during the previous day’s testimony after four of the seven members expressed concerns about it. Changes in Committee Substitute SB 2126 […]
In Support of HB 907: Doubling Fines for Unregistered Sand Mining
After Hurricane Harvey, I saw mountains of sand everywhere I looked near the San Jacinto River. Since then, I have been studying the origins of the sand and am convinced that part of it comes from bootleg sand mining operations upstream that have destabilized river banks. Bootleg Operators Destabilize River Banks You don’t have to […]
SB 2126 Stalls in Committee
Senate Bill 2126 could open the door to in-river sand mining, but was left pending in the Water & Rural Affairs Committee late last night. Uncontested but Not Unquestioned Testimony Testimony started at about 8 pm. Chuck Gilman from the San Jacinto River Authority (SJRA) and David Perkins from Texas Aggregate & Concrete Association (TACA) […]
Caution: SB 2126 Opens Door to Sand Mining in Rivers
Senate Bill (SB) 2126 is well intentioned. However, in my opinion, its present wording could have disastrous unintended consequences. What Bill Does SB 2126 would allow a “conservation or reclamation district” to take sand from the West Fork and its tributaries in order to “restore, maintain, or expand the capacity of the river and its […]
Time Running Out for Legislation On Sand Mining
Approximately two-thirds of this legislative session has expired. The maximum length for a legislative session in Texas is 140 days starting on the second Tuesday in January. We are 96 days into this session. So where do we stand on key pieces of legislation related to sand mining and other flood mitigation? A quick update. […]