2/5/26 – For months, Huffman residents have complained about TXDoT contractors dumping fill in the floodplain of Cedar Bayou. This morning, I caught the dumping on camera. The fill comes from two stormwater detention basin sites. One is almost complete. The other one is larger and still being excavated. Both sites are adjacent to the FM2100 reconstruction project.
Dumping Without Permit
Dumping fill in a 100-year floodplain violates county regulations.
Regulations Effective July 9, 2019
Dumping fill in unincorporated areas of Harris County, such as this one, also requires a permit, which the contractors do not have. Harris County Precinct 3 has tried to stop the illegal activity, according to Eric Mullen, Precinct 3’s head engineer.
Jason Haines, a project manager for Precinct 3, says this fill does not have a permit. He also has tried to stop the dumping. But the contractors have not complied. He says that compliance will require either: removal of the fill or removing an equivalent amount somewhere else in the floodplain.
The visual below shows where the fill is coming from and going to. In both cases, it’s coming from outside the floodplain and going into one.
Luce Bayou cuts across left, Cedar Bayou cuts across lower right. Aqua area = 100 year floodplain.
Reducing the volume of a floodplain forces stormwater to go elsewhere, i.e., into someone else’s home or business. That’s why the regulations exist.
This morning, I photographed a parade of dump trucks being filled up at the triangular site above and depositing their loads in the floodplain. The activity has been going on for months, according to local residents Max Kidd and his wife.
Below is a small sampling of hundreds of photos I took today and on two previous occasions. They have GPS coordinates embedded in them so you can verify their locations in software, such as PhotoGeoTag.
Triangular site adjacent to FM2100, which TxDOT is excavating. Approximately 26 acres.This dump truck with the blue cab was being filled up at the triangular site.
I then followed that blue truck to the dump site, a farm just south of the Luce Inter-basin Transfer Canal.
Dump siteSame truck with blue cab pulls into position to dump its fill through a door opening beneath the trailer.As it drops its load, a bulldozer immediately starts smoothing it out so the next truck can deposit its load.I watched this for hours, shuttling from Point A to Point B and back again.As one truck left, another moved in. The elevation of the fill is quite high compared to the height of the bulldozer.The presence of lights indicates the activity may continue after dark.Load after load…all in the floodplain.
And it’s not just this one mound.
Additional fill deposited on another part of the same property but not yet spread. Luce Inter-basin Transfer Canal at top.Residents say dirt from this detention basin was also deposited at the same site although I have no pictures of the actual dumping.
It’s the Principle that Counts
The dump site (l) is less than a mile from the Huffman High School and Middle School (r), making them more vulnerable to reduced floodplain capacity.
Note: all floodplains above are based on 2007 pre-Harvey data. The floodplains should get even wider and deeper when FEMA releases the new flood maps.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/5/2026
3082 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Huffman-Floodplains-copy.png?fit=1100%2C784&ssl=17841100adminadmin2026-02-05 16:03:542026-02-23 16:48:07Caught on Camera: TXDoT Contractor Dumping Fill in Floodplain
2/4/26 – Yesterday, the Houston Planning and Development Department called to say that Romerica has withdrawn the variance request for its plat application from the Houston Planning Commission’s agenda for 2/5/26. So, if you were planning to go downtown to protest it tomorrow, there is no longer any need.
Kingwood Residents Concerned about Floodplain Development
Local residents in Kingwood Lakes, Barrington and Trailwood Villages became concerned when they discovered that Romerica was back with the third-iteration of plans to build in the floodway and floodplains of the San Jacinto West Fork. Romerica was seeking plat approval to build a 500,000 square-foot, two-hotel complex with 125 large-luxury villas in a swamp.
The company claimed it would elevate all structures and 6000 feet of roads 60 feet wide on the northern-most part of their property.
During the debate about their plans with Houston Public Works, it became clear that Romerica had not complied with regulations requiring them to post signage at the entrance to their property that notified the public of their plans.
Unanswered Questions, Concerns
Yesterday, I received a phone call and email from John P. Cedillo in the City’s Planning and Development Department.
His email said, “The application for River Grove GP [General Plan] has been withdrawn by the applicant and will not be considered at the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on February 5. The applicant will need to re-submit and re-start the process including the notice requirements, such as notice letters and notice signs erected for the site.”
In my opinion, this is good news. Many questions remain about Romerica’s plans. For instance, they claimed the hotel would be a Fairmont. But after days of trying, I could not find anyone at Fairmont who would confirm that.
A source in the hotel business told me that the reputational damage to a hotel chain would be so great if one of its properties flooded that they typically have higher standards than even city and county regulators. That’s especially true of high-end international chains, such as Fairmont. Word of a flooded Fairmont Hotel would spread around the world overnight because they draw international clients.
Another source called the proposed development “on the wrong side of the tracks.” That was not a slur against Kingwood, just an acknowledgment of market potential for the planned location. He said that all chains look at traffic counts as their first location-screening tool. “If it’s not on or near an interstate freeway, they don’t want to hear about it,” he said.
Even though plat approvals have to do with street layouts, residents were concerned about the potential to make flooding worse in the area at the south end of Woodland Hills Drive – especially in an area where the thoroughfare itself, i.e., the evacuation route, would be under water in a 100-year flood.
In fact, it last went under water in May 2024.
Romerica proposes to build where water reached treetops to the right of Barrington in May 2024.
Ronnie Bulanek, a Barrington resident said of Romerica’s latest setback, “It is great news. It will/should be very difficult to develop the land in question without dramatic consequences for the neighboring communities. Until the Lake Houston dam and other flood mitigation issues are completed nothing should be developed in this parcel.”
For More Information
Romerica is the same company that previously proposed building 50-story high-rises next to the floodway of the West Fork. The Army Corps nixed that plan.
Romerica later proposed building homes on stilts. But the company ran into challenges with the Planning Commission then, too.
For more information on Romerica’s proposal, see their presentations which include schematics:
Those concerns were only exacerbated when Bloch obtained Romerica’s preliminary drainage analysis the day of the last Planning Commission Meeting on 1/22/26. It raised more questions than answers. Luckily, the Planning Commission deferred action on Romerica’s variance request at that meeting, too. District E City Council Member Fred Flickinger had it pulled from the Commission’s agenda.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/4/26
3081 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/01/20260119-FEMA-Floodplains-for-Romerica.jpg?fit=1100%2C870&ssl=18701100adminadmin2026-02-04 14:24:052026-02-04 14:40:31Romerica Withdraws Plat Application for Proposed Floodplain Development
2/3/26 – On 2/1/26, I printed a story about Steve Toth’s shocking voting record in 2021 and 2023. He called me dishonest, claiming I misrepresented his votes on five of the first six bills he checked on my list. See his text and my response below.
Screen capture from 2/2/26 of text exchange with Steve Toth re: his first 6 votes on 2021-2023 list.
Twenty-four hours after my offer above, Toth has not asked for one legitimate correction. Nor has he sent me a rebuttal. So…onward to Toth’s 2025 voting record.
Overview of Toth’s 2025 Voting Record
In 2025, Toth continued voting against a majority of Republicans on common-sense issues. See the list below. I boiled it down from 53 pages of NO votes on important measures. Toth changes his votes frequently. But as in my previous post, I only included FINAL votes…or the way he clarified he intended to vote.
In my opinion, Toth doesn’t deserve to be called a Republican; he’s an anarchist disguised in Republican clothes who consistently votes against the safety and welfare of his constituents.
For starters, in 2025, Toth voted against flood mitigation, free speech, food banks, cybersecurity, conservation, grid reliability, open meetings, transparency, ethics, border security, fraud protections, and disclosure of campaign finance information.
Groups Toth Voted Against
Despite what he claims, Toth also voted against groups such as law enforcement, first responders, consumers, patients, motorists, veterans, educators, CPAs, dentists, dental hygienists, farmers, restauranteurs, insurers, aviators, heath-care providers, seniors, schoolchildren, whistleblowers, correctional officers, manufacturers, attorneys, college students, utility employees, people who work from home, flood victims, crime victims, and rural Texans.
Toth Even Voted Against Voters
Why? By voting NO on virtually everything, Toth improved his so-called “conservative rating.”
Toth’s trolls make you think he walks on floodwater – while you’re neck-deep in it. They ignore Toth’s own record, while blasting his opponent, Dan Crenshaw with lies and half truths.
If you want to know what Steve Toth stands FOR, look at what he voted AGAINST.
Bob Rehak
For instance, he’s voted multiple times against measures to control fraud, sexual abuse and family violence.
Making social-media companies investigate explicit deep-fake images
HB 3133
AI protections for consumers
HB 149
Banning e-cigarettes disguised as school supplies and toys
SB 2024
Requiring hand-counted ballots to be machine readable for tally verification
HB 3113
Disclosure of campaign finance information
HB 4406
Timely filing of campaign finance reports
HB 1804
Accurate and complete voter registrations
HB 2785
Legible ballots
HB 3697
Letting voters use cell phones while standing in long lines outside
HB 3909
Publishing regulations for placement of political signs
HB 3918
Fining lobbyists who violate restrictions on political contributions
SB 2781
Helping electricity providers recover faster from weather disasters
SB 1963
Protecting oil/gas infrastructure from natural disasters, cyberthreats, and terrorism
HB 1169
Recognizing importance of natural gas during electricity shortages
HB 5224
Inspecting well sites for wildfire susceptibility
HB 3334
Fire safety standards and emergency operations plans
HB 3824
Nuclear energy workforce-development program
SB 1535
Grid-reliability measures that protect customers from outages
SB 6
Recognizing the strategic importance of the Panama Canal
SCR 37
Curbing mass importation of foreign shrimp
HCR 76
Moving NASA headquarters to Houston
HCR 141
Making first responders’ emergency-communication equipment interoperable across Texas
HB 13
All appropriations for 2026-2027
SB 1
Job creation and economic development in Texas
HB 1268
Developing an artificial-intelligence group within the State’s information resources group
HB 2818
Selling surplus DPS vehicles to economically disadvantaged school districts
HB 1851
Planning for severe weather
HB 2618
Bullet-resistant windows for police vehicles
HB 2217
Putting teeth into the state’s open-meetings law
HB 3711
A statewide inventory of equipment available to respond to wildfires
SB 767
Using captured floodwater to expand water supplies
SB 1967
Aerospace, aviation, and space exploration initiatives
HB 5246
Quantum computing
HB 4751
Exempting non-profit food-bank trucks from gasoline taxes
HB 4226
Creating a Texas Severance Tax Revenue and Oil and Natural Gas defense fund (Texas STRONG)
HJR 47
Sharing information about cybersecurity threats and best practices
HB 876
Modernizing manufacturing
SB 2925
Attorney education re: open meetings
HB 4991
Hedging state funds against inflation
SB 21
Making Texas R&D more competitive
SB 2206
Artificial Intelligence regulation
SB 1964
Cybersecurity and AI training for state employees
HB 3512
Establishing a Texas Cyber Command at UT
HB 150
Strengthening education-to-workforce pipelines
SB 1786
Free EMS courses for Texas paramedics
HB 1105
Property tax exemptions for charities supporting medical education
HB 4240
Rights of students to protest peacefully
SB 2972
Nutrition counseling for Medicaid recipients
HB 26
Reducing insurance losses by making property more wind resistant
HB 1576
Reducing Texas windstorm-insurance costs
HB 2518
Requiring written, detailed explanations of auto-repair costs
HB 722
Requiring health benefit plans to cover telemedicine costs
HB 1052
Covering general anesthesia costs for pediatric dental services
SB 527
Insuring first responders on deployment across Texas
HB 4464
Reducing recidivism of juvenile drug addicts
HB 1831
Alzheimer’s and dementia training for guardians
HB 3376
Penalizing fraudulent use of gift cards
SB 1809
Training correctional officers in de-escalation and crisis-intervention
HB 2756
Prohibiting government retaliation against whistleblowers
HB 1232
Prosecuting the fraudulent use of credit cards
HB 272
Studying ways to prevent theft of petroleum products in Texas
SB 494
Letting the PUC screen criminal records of employees and contractors
HB 4344
Combatting human trafficking
SB 610
Preventing interference with utility employees performing their duties
HB 1160
Requiring assisted-living facilities to be licensed
HB 2510
Increasing the minimum duration for emergency-protection orders
SB 2196
Protecting animal-control officers removing carcasses from roadways
SB 305
Creating liabilities for online impersonators who harm others
HB 783
Alleviating court backlogs with retired judges
HB 1664
Protecting family-violence victims from their alleged abusers
HB 4027
Updating laws that reduce electronic card-skimmer fraud
SB 2371
Penalizing those who publish personal information of others with the intent to threaten or harm them or their families
HB 3425
Clarifying conduct that constitutes exploitation and coercion of children, the elderly, and disabled
HB 1347
Increasing penalties for assaulting utility employees performing their duties
SB 482
Requiring convicted child sex traffickers to pay restitution to victims
SB 1804
Making road-rage shootings an aggravated-assault offense
SB 3031
Combatting misuse of AI to generate false harmful, intimate visuals
SB 441
Increasing penalties for driving while intoxicated in school zones
SB 826
Letting municipalities suspend or revoke certificates of occupancy for hotels involved in human trafficking
HB 5509
Creating a Lake Houston Dredging and Maintenance District
HB 1532
Establishing qualifications for county fire marshals
HB 3687
Increasing higher-education tuition exemptions for military service members
HB 290
Studying obstacles that Texas veterans face when accessing veterans’ cemeteries
HB 1875
Studying ways to improve mental health services for vets
HB 1965
Studying ways to deliver veterans’ benefits more efficiently
HB 2193
Studying ways to use government-surplus real estate to house veterans and low-income families
HB 158
Coordinating activities for the 200th anniversary of Texas’ independence
SB 1350
Training appraisal-district board members
HB 148
Requiring landlords to inform tenants of flood risks in writing
SB 2349
Addressing fraudulent property claims and providing a remedy for affected owners
SB 1734
Streamlining college admissions
SB 2314
Improving early learning for children with disabilities or developmental delays
HB 2310
Providing instructional materials for career education in health care to ISDs
HB 2189
First-aid training on “airway clearance” in public schools
HB 549
Civics instruction in high schools
HB 824
Grants for Texas-history education
SB 519
Preventing sexual abuse of students by school employees
HB 4623
Telemedicine for rural Texans
HB 18
Establishing a Dementia Prevention and Research Institute of Texas and supporting dementia research
SJR 3
Emergency contraceptives for sexual assault victims
HB 220
Requiring assisted-living facilities to adopt power-outage emergency plans that include climate-controlled areas
HB 3595
Tracking distribution of opioid antagonists to help prevent drug overdoses
HB 4783
Minimum training requirements for day-care centers
HB 4665
Helping opioid-users on Medicaid who are pregnant
HB 5155
Educating college freshmen about fentanyl and other drugs
HB 3062
Increasing accountability for nursing homes in the Medicaid program
SB 457
Creating regional mobility authorities
HJR 144
Requiring the Texas Transportation Commission to back projects that improve border security
HB 3849
Prohibiting trains from blocking roads for 30 minutes or more
HB 4207
Requiring seatbelts in older buses to protect schoolchildren
SB 546
I Believe NOTHING Toth Says Anymore
I no longer believe anything the do-nothing Mr. Toth and his hired trolls say. Toth paints himself as a conservative purist…while lying about his opponent who gets results for his constituents. Toth also lies about his own record. That’s yet another reason why I’m voting for Dan Crenshaw and I hope you do, too.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/3/26
3080 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/02/Toth-Conversation.png?fit=1370%2C840&ssl=18401370adminadmin2026-02-03 15:48:412026-02-04 06:25:19Toth’s Lies and 2025 Voting Record Exposed
Caught on Camera: TXDoT Contractor Dumping Fill in Floodplain
2/5/26 – For months, Huffman residents have complained about TXDoT contractors dumping fill in the floodplain of Cedar Bayou. This morning, I caught the dumping on camera. The fill comes from two stormwater detention basin sites. One is almost complete. The other one is larger and still being excavated. Both sites are adjacent to the FM2100 reconstruction project.
Dumping Without Permit
Dumping fill in unincorporated areas of Harris County, such as this one, also requires a permit, which the contractors do not have. Harris County Precinct 3 has tried to stop the illegal activity, according to Eric Mullen, Precinct 3’s head engineer.
Jason Haines, a project manager for Precinct 3, says this fill does not have a permit. He also has tried to stop the dumping. But the contractors have not complied. He says that compliance will require either: removal of the fill or removing an equivalent amount somewhere else in the floodplain.
The visual below shows where the fill is coming from and going to. In both cases, it’s coming from outside the floodplain and going into one.
Reducing the volume of a floodplain forces stormwater to go elsewhere, i.e., into someone else’s home or business. That’s why the regulations exist.
This morning, I photographed a parade of dump trucks being filled up at the triangular site above and depositing their loads in the floodplain. The activity has been going on for months, according to local residents Max Kidd and his wife.
Below is a small sampling of hundreds of photos I took today and on two previous occasions. They have GPS coordinates embedded in them so you can verify their locations in software, such as PhotoGeoTag.
I then followed that blue truck to the dump site, a farm just south of the Luce Inter-basin Transfer Canal.
And it’s not just this one mound.
It’s the Principle that Counts
Note: all floodplains above are based on 2007 pre-Harvey data. The floodplains should get even wider and deeper when FEMA releases the new flood maps.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/5/2026
3082 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
Romerica Withdraws Plat Application for Proposed Floodplain Development
2/4/26 – Yesterday, the Houston Planning and Development Department called to say that Romerica has withdrawn the variance request for its plat application from the Houston Planning Commission’s agenda for 2/5/26. So, if you were planning to go downtown to protest it tomorrow, there is no longer any need.
Kingwood Residents Concerned about Floodplain Development
Local residents in Kingwood Lakes, Barrington and Trailwood Villages became concerned when they discovered that Romerica was back with the third-iteration of plans to build in the floodway and floodplains of the San Jacinto West Fork. Romerica was seeking plat approval to build a 500,000 square-foot, two-hotel complex with 125 large-luxury villas in a swamp.
The company claimed it would elevate all structures and 6000 feet of roads 60 feet wide on the northern-most part of their property.
But their preliminary drainage analysis also showed them bringing in fill dirt. And Romerica’s ambitious plans indicated they would have to bring in far more dirt than their drainage analysis indicated.
During the debate about their plans with Houston Public Works, it became clear that Romerica had not complied with regulations requiring them to post signage at the entrance to their property that notified the public of their plans.
Unanswered Questions, Concerns
Yesterday, I received a phone call and email from John P. Cedillo in the City’s Planning and Development Department.
His email said, “The application for River Grove GP [General Plan] has been withdrawn by the applicant and will not be considered at the upcoming Planning Commission meeting on February 5. The applicant will need to re-submit and re-start the process including the notice requirements, such as notice letters and notice signs erected for the site.”
In my opinion, this is good news. Many questions remain about Romerica’s plans. For instance, they claimed the hotel would be a Fairmont. But after days of trying, I could not find anyone at Fairmont who would confirm that.
A source in the hotel business told me that the reputational damage to a hotel chain would be so great if one of its properties flooded that they typically have higher standards than even city and county regulators. That’s especially true of high-end international chains, such as Fairmont. Word of a flooded Fairmont Hotel would spread around the world overnight because they draw international clients.
Another source called the proposed development “on the wrong side of the tracks.” That was not a slur against Kingwood, just an acknowledgment of market potential for the planned location. He said that all chains look at traffic counts as their first location-screening tool. “If it’s not on or near an interstate freeway, they don’t want to hear about it,” he said.
Even though plat approvals have to do with street layouts, residents were concerned about the potential to make flooding worse in the area at the south end of Woodland Hills Drive – especially in an area where the thoroughfare itself, i.e., the evacuation route, would be under water in a 100-year flood.
In fact, it last went under water in May 2024.
Ronnie Bulanek, a Barrington resident said of Romerica’s latest setback, “It is great news. It will/should be very difficult to develop the land in question without dramatic consequences for the neighboring communities. Until the Lake Houston dam and other flood mitigation issues are completed nothing should be developed in this parcel.”
For More Information
Romerica is the same company that previously proposed building 50-story high-rises next to the floodway of the West Fork. The Army Corps nixed that plan.
Romerica later proposed building homes on stilts. But the company ran into challenges with the Planning Commission then, too.
For more information on Romerica’s proposal, see their presentations which include schematics:
Chris Bloch, a flood activist who has studied Kingwood drainage issues for decades, had these concerns about the proposed development along South Woodland Hills.
Those concerns were only exacerbated when Bloch obtained Romerica’s preliminary drainage analysis the day of the last Planning Commission Meeting on 1/22/26. It raised more questions than answers. Luckily, the Planning Commission deferred action on Romerica’s variance request at that meeting, too. District E City Council Member Fred Flickinger had it pulled from the Commission’s agenda.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/4/26
3081 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
Toth’s Lies and 2025 Voting Record Exposed
2/3/26 – On 2/1/26, I printed a story about Steve Toth’s shocking voting record in 2021 and 2023. He called me dishonest, claiming I misrepresented his votes on five of the first six bills he checked on my list. See his text and my response below.
Twenty-four hours after my offer above, Toth has not asked for one legitimate correction. Nor has he sent me a rebuttal. So…onward to Toth’s 2025 voting record.
Overview of Toth’s 2025 Voting Record
In 2025, Toth continued voting against a majority of Republicans on common-sense issues. See the list below. I boiled it down from 53 pages of NO votes on important measures. Toth changes his votes frequently. But as in my previous post, I only included FINAL votes…or the way he clarified he intended to vote.
In my opinion, Toth doesn’t deserve to be called a Republican; he’s an anarchist disguised in Republican clothes who consistently votes against the safety and welfare of his constituents.
For starters, in 2025, Toth voted against flood mitigation, free speech, food banks, cybersecurity, conservation, grid reliability, open meetings, transparency, ethics, border security, fraud protections, and disclosure of campaign finance information.
Groups Toth Voted Against
Despite what he claims, Toth also voted against groups such as law enforcement, first responders, consumers, patients, motorists, veterans, educators, CPAs, dentists, dental hygienists, farmers, restauranteurs, insurers, aviators, heath-care providers, seniors, schoolchildren, whistleblowers, correctional officers, manufacturers, attorneys, college students, utility employees, people who work from home, flood victims, crime victims, and rural Texans.
Toth Even Voted Against Voters
Why? By voting NO on virtually everything, Toth improved his so-called “conservative rating.”
Toth’s trolls make you think he walks on floodwater – while you’re neck-deep in it. They ignore Toth’s own record, while blasting his opponent, Dan Crenshaw with lies and half truths.
For instance, he’s voted multiple times against measures to control fraud, sexual abuse and family violence.
Toth NO Votes on 2025 Bills
For more information about each bill below (including the full text), visit the Texas Legislature Online website. In 2025:
I Believe NOTHING Toth Says Anymore
I no longer believe anything the do-nothing Mr. Toth and his hired trolls say. Toth paints himself as a conservative purist…while lying about his opponent who gets results for his constituents. Toth also lies about his own record. That’s yet another reason why I’m voting for Dan Crenshaw and I hope you do, too.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 2/3/26
3080 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.