3/29/25 – Every time I fly over the San Jacinto West Fork, I wonder, “What would it take to transform all the wastelands to wetlands again?”
Typical scene along banks of San Jacinto West Fork between I-69 and I-45.
That burning question has guided much of my research for the last eight years. I don’t have all the details worked out, but I would like to share a vision for restoring the area’s:
Natural beauty
Recreational potential
Ability to:
Reduce flooding and sedimentation
Attract economic development.
The restoration would be incremental and generational. It will not happen overnight. And the timing will, no doubt, depend on how much sand remains.
All the more reason for all parties to agree on a vision that can guide future restoration and redevelopment. So, let me propose a vision to start the debate and stimulate ideas. All of us are smarter than one of us.
The Vision
I would like to see a mile-wide, 20-mile long recreational area between I-45 and I-69 with lakes and ponds, all connected by hike-and-bike trails. It would be called the Montgomery County Lake District. And it would connect to the West Fork and Spring Creek Greenways.
Dense forests/wetlands in Lake Houston Park on East Fork represent potential of nature to reduce flooding and sedimentation.
Such an area would feature kayak launches and fishing piers. It would also feature covered pavilions, restrooms and parking lots in the higher elevations near the edges of the preserve.
Constructed wetlands would filter runoff from nearby developments.
Image of great egret in breeding plumage captured at High Island
The floodplains would be planted with native grasses, wildflowers, and flood-resilient trees such as willow and bald cypress.
Some of the pavilions might even have educational exhibits that explain about restoration efforts and the native wildlife.
To put this concept in perspective, Lake Houston Park – not far away on the East Fork – is already the largest urban nature park in North America. The area in the floodplains and floodway of the West Fork between 59 and 45 could be TWO TO THREE TIMES LARGER. Restoring and preserving it could draw national attention to Montgomery County and Houston as a role model.
What Would It Take?
From an exclusively physical point of view, turning old sand mines into sanctuaries would likely require the actions below. (I’ll discuss financial, permitting, legislative and other needs in future posts.)
With effort, the sand pits could be transformed into giant detention basins that hold hundreds, if not thousands, of acre feet of stormwater during floods. They could also intercept sediment carried downstream by the river during floods.
The design would likely incorporate overflow weirs to accommodate flood pulses.
For safety and flood resilience, we would need to regrade the pits. The edges should be shallow and gradual. Avoid sharp drop-offs that could challenge young swimmers or waders.
Gradual slopes also help with replanting native vegetation. We should use dense plantings of native trees and wildflowers to create visual buffers.
The area would also feature educational signage along trails to encourage outdoor activities, environmental awareness and collective action.
We should collectively buy and preserve any not-yet-spoiled land between the mines also, so trails can be continuous along the entire length of the river.
Make Miners Part of the Solution
Prior to a mine’s closing, miners should re-contour any high, steep pitwalls, overburden piles, or embankments. Slopes should not exceed a 2:1 (50%) grade, with gentler 3:1 slopes preferred to enhance stability and allow vegetation to take hold.
Avoid long, continuous slopes to reduce erosion and break them up with terraces to facilitate seeding and maintenance.
Where runoff concentrates, install lined channels or rock chutes to convey water safely downslope without gullying. Use riprap to protect outlets, dissipate energy and prevent scour.
As mines near the end of their producing life, begin revegetating all areas not occupied by water bodies. Reclaim the land progressively in phases, as production ends in one part of the mine and continues elsewhere. Prompt reclamation prevents abandoned pits from becoming illegal dump sites.
Mines need to demobilize all equipment and remove industrial materials, fuel tanks, maintenance shops, debris piles, etc. The final land surface should be free of trash, waste and equipment.
Abandoned dredge, West Fork Sand Mine in Humble.
The goal: a stable site with self-sustaining vegetation, no significant sediment leaving the property, and no uncontrolled discharges into the West Fork or its tributaries.
All these recommendations are consistent with TCEQ Best Management Practices for Sand Mining in the San Jacinto Watershed and case studies from around the world.
Additional Efforts
A vision is just the glue that guides the efforts of many different parties as they work together to achieve common goals. Of course, creating such a transformation takes more than a vision. It takes sweat, money and leadership. So we also need to:
Identify and Enroll Stakeholders
Engage Engineers to Develop a Design
Obtain Permits from Multiple Levels of Government
Initiate Legislative Efforts to Create a Redevelopment Authority/District
Raise Funds and Apply for Grants
Provide for Ongoing Maintenance
I’ll discuss these additional topics in future posts to keep the length of this one manageable.
Please stay with me and share these posts with friends, families and neighbors. Also, please contribute your own ideas through the contact form of this website.
Together, we can turn sand into sanctuaries and wastelands into wetlands again.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 3/29/25
2769 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/20140322-20140322-20140322-_RJR5665.jpg?fit=1100%2C732&ssl=17321100adminadmin2025-03-29 19:38:462025-03-30 12:03:06Wastelands to Wetlands: A Vision for Restoring the San Jacinto West Fork
The most cherished compliments come from the people you respect the most. Yesterday, I (and ReduceFlooding.com) received an award from the Lions Clubs International Foundation for Dedicated Humanitarian Services.
About Lions Clubs
You would be hard pressed to find a group of people more dedicated to community service than the 1.4 million members of 49,000 Lions Clubs in 200 countries around the world. They’re involved in causes as diverse as hunger, childhood cancer, disaster relief, the environment and more. They are the youngest major, global service organization, but have grown to be the largest.
Our local chapter, the Humble Noon Lions Club, focuses on pediatric eye screenings of pre-school children as young as six months. They also:
Collect used eyeglasses for people who can’t afford them
Support special needs children
Sponsor camps for disabled children
Assist HAAM with the distribution of Meals on Wheels to unsheltered clients
Support the Humble ISD Foundation with scholarships, teacher grants, and vision screening at their health fairs.
A Big ‘Thank You’ to Lions and Readers
So, it was quite an honor when the local Lion’s club honored my efforts with ReduceFlooding.com yesterday. My focus is on raising awareness of the causes of flooding and what people are doing to mitigate it…especially in the Houston region.
Award ceremony at what used to be Rehak Creative Services before I retired and is now the Creativity Shell.Tony Austin, presenting the award. I’m the suit. And the woman next to me is my wife of 50 years, Susan Davy.
I never really thought of myself as a humanitarian. I just wanted to make my community a safer place to live. But I will happily accept the award. And it will rest in a place of honor in my home.
Thank you, Lions for all you do. Thank you, Susan Davy, for all your help. And thank you, readers, for keeping the fight alive to make the Houston region a safer place to live. Together, we can do it.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 3/28/2025
2768 Days since Hurricane Harvey
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/20250327-DSC_1901.jpg?fit=1100%2C733&ssl=17331100adminadmin2025-03-28 10:53:252025-03-28 10:58:50Lions Clubs Award
3/26/25 – From a public policy perspective, is it more economical to permit floodplain developments or mitigate them after floods? I asked ChatGPT that question this morning. It was consistent with year’s of research on flooding.
The issue pertains directly to posts in the last two days about a proposed development called the Crossing at the Commons of Lake Houston. After being required by the City of Houston to raise the elevation of slabs two feet above the 500-year floodplain, the developer challenged the City all the way to the Texas Supreme Court.
Location of the Crossing at The Commons of Lake Houston relative to Kingwood and Lake Houston Park
Policymakers, urban planners, and economists wrestle with this question of prevention vs. correction all the time. The short answer: It’s generally more economical to restrict floodplain development than to pay for damages later. Here’s why.
Cost Comparison: Prevention vs. Mitigation
Upfront Development in Floodplains (Short-Term Gain)
Pros: Cheaper land, attractive to developers and buyers.
Cons: High long-term costs due to:
Property damage (often repetitive).
Infrastructure repair (roads, utilities).
Emergency response costs.
Health impacts (mold, contaminated water).
Insurance payouts or federal disaster relief.
FEMA reports that every $1 spent on mitigation saves an average of $6 in future disaster costs.
A scientific study published in the journal Nature Sustainability found similar results. Every dollar spent acquiring flood-prone land (a specific kind of mitigation) avoids five dollars in damages.
Examples of Mitigation Costs
Post-flood buyouts: Government often buys and demolishes homes after repeated flooding.
Levees/dams: Expensive to build and maintain — and they can fail.
Flood insurance subsidies: Taxpayers often foot the bill via programs like the U.S. National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP), which is deeply in debt.
Smart Prevention Strategies (More Economic in the Long Run)
Zoning restrictions to keep development out of high-risk zones.
Green infrastructure like wetlands that absorb floodwaters.
Elevated buildings or flood-resistant designs where development is unavoidable.
Buyouts and conservation easements before development occurs.
In the past, Houston allowed extensive floodplain development. As a consequence, it faced massive losses during Hurricane Harvey. Post-flood buyouts and infrastructure repairs have cost billions. The estimated costs of Harvey adjusted for inflation now approach $160 billion.
“While development in floodplains may seem cheaper at first, the long-term economic, environmental, and social costs almost always outweigh the initial savings,” according to ChatGPT.
The developer reaps the profit, but taxpayers bear the costs.
Houston and Harris County
Looking at Houston and Harris County as opposed to national figures, evidence again suggests that proactive floodplain management is far more cost-effective than reactive mitigation.
The enormous expenses associated with post-flood recovery—illustrated by the massive losses from Hurricane Harvey—underscore the economic and social benefits of investing in prevention. Not only does prevention save money, it also helps protect community well-being, property values, and local infrastructure.
Houston and Harris County have adopted several preventive measures. Chief among them:
Floodplain Development Regulations:
Houston enforces stringent regulations for construction within flood-prone areas. The city’s Floodplain Management Office oversees permitting to ensure compliance with the floodplain ordinance and FEMA regulations. Notably, new structures are required to be elevated at least two feet above the 500-year flood elevation to mitigate potential flood damage.
Home Buyout Programs:
The Harris County Flood Control District administers voluntary home buyout programs aimed at relocating residents from high-risk flood zones. These programs have successfully acquired and demolished numerous properties, restoring approximately 1,300 acres to their natural floodplain functions and preventing future flood damages.
Such investments in flood mitigation have proven to be economically beneficial not just nationally, but in Houston, too. Studies indicate that for every $1 spent on mitigation, there is an average savings of $6 in future disaster costs.
$2.5 Billion 2018 Flood Bond
In 2018, Harris County voters passed a $2.5 billion flood bond. While primarily aimed at correcting past problems, it will also prevent future flooding. But so far, most of the money has been spent in Low-to-Moderate Income areas. That leaves more affluent areas, including the Commons of Lake Houston, with elevated flood risk.
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
https://i0.wp.com/reduceflooding.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Crossing-Location.jpg?fit=1100%2C680&ssl=16801100adminadmin2025-03-26 15:02:502025-03-26 15:36:31Is it more economic to permit floodplain developments or mitigate them after floods?
Wastelands to Wetlands: A Vision for Restoring the San Jacinto West Fork
3/29/25 – Every time I fly over the San Jacinto West Fork, I wonder, “What would it take to transform all the wastelands to wetlands again?”
That burning question has guided much of my research for the last eight years. I don’t have all the details worked out, but I would like to share a vision for restoring the area’s:
The restoration would be incremental and generational. It will not happen overnight. And the timing will, no doubt, depend on how much sand remains.
All the more reason for all parties to agree on a vision that can guide future restoration and redevelopment. So, let me propose a vision to start the debate and stimulate ideas. All of us are smarter than one of us.
The Vision
I would like to see a mile-wide, 20-mile long recreational area between I-45 and I-69 with lakes and ponds, all connected by hike-and-bike trails. It would be called the Montgomery County Lake District. And it would connect to the West Fork and Spring Creek Greenways.
Such an area would feature kayak launches and fishing piers. It would also feature covered pavilions, restrooms and parking lots in the higher elevations near the edges of the preserve.
Constructed wetlands would filter runoff from nearby developments.
Islands in the larger lakes and ponds would attract birds and bird watchers, much like the Houston Audubon Society’s Smith Oaks Sanctuary in High Island.
The floodplains would be planted with native grasses, wildflowers, and flood-resilient trees such as willow and bald cypress.
Some of the pavilions might even have educational exhibits that explain about restoration efforts and the native wildlife.
To put this concept in perspective, Lake Houston Park – not far away on the East Fork – is already the largest urban nature park in North America. The area in the floodplains and floodway of the West Fork between 59 and 45 could be TWO TO THREE TIMES LARGER. Restoring and preserving it could draw national attention to Montgomery County and Houston as a role model.
What Would It Take?
From an exclusively physical point of view, turning old sand mines into sanctuaries would likely require the actions below. (I’ll discuss financial, permitting, legislative and other needs in future posts.)
With effort, the sand pits could be transformed into giant detention basins that hold hundreds, if not thousands, of acre feet of stormwater during floods. They could also intercept sediment carried downstream by the river during floods.
The design would likely incorporate overflow weirs to accommodate flood pulses.
For safety and flood resilience, we would need to regrade the pits. The edges should be shallow and gradual. Avoid sharp drop-offs that could challenge young swimmers or waders.
Gradual slopes also help with replanting native vegetation. We should use dense plantings of native trees and wildflowers to create visual buffers.
The area would also feature educational signage along trails to encourage outdoor activities, environmental awareness and collective action.
We should collectively buy and preserve any not-yet-spoiled land between the mines also, so trails can be continuous along the entire length of the river.
Make Miners Part of the Solution
Prior to a mine’s closing, miners should re-contour any high, steep pitwalls, overburden piles, or embankments. Slopes should not exceed a 2:1 (50%) grade, with gentler 3:1 slopes preferred to enhance stability and allow vegetation to take hold.
Avoid long, continuous slopes to reduce erosion and break them up with terraces to facilitate seeding and maintenance.
Where runoff concentrates, install lined channels or rock chutes to convey water safely downslope without gullying. Use riprap to protect outlets, dissipate energy and prevent scour.
As mines near the end of their producing life, begin revegetating all areas not occupied by water bodies. Reclaim the land progressively in phases, as production ends in one part of the mine and continues elsewhere. Prompt reclamation prevents abandoned pits from becoming illegal dump sites.
Mines need to demobilize all equipment and remove industrial materials, fuel tanks, maintenance shops, debris piles, etc. The final land surface should be free of trash, waste and equipment.
The goal: a stable site with self-sustaining vegetation, no significant sediment leaving the property, and no uncontrolled discharges into the West Fork or its tributaries.
All these recommendations are consistent with TCEQ Best Management Practices for Sand Mining in the San Jacinto Watershed and case studies from around the world.
Additional Efforts
A vision is just the glue that guides the efforts of many different parties as they work together to achieve common goals. Of course, creating such a transformation takes more than a vision. It takes sweat, money and leadership. So we also need to:
I’ll discuss these additional topics in future posts to keep the length of this one manageable.
Please stay with me and share these posts with friends, families and neighbors. Also, please contribute your own ideas through the contact form of this website.
Together, we can turn sand into sanctuaries and wastelands into wetlands again.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 3/29/25
2769 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.
Lions Clubs Award
The most cherished compliments come from the people you respect the most. Yesterday, I (and ReduceFlooding.com) received an award from the Lions Clubs International Foundation for Dedicated Humanitarian Services.
About Lions Clubs
You would be hard pressed to find a group of people more dedicated to community service than the 1.4 million members of 49,000 Lions Clubs in 200 countries around the world. They’re involved in causes as diverse as hunger, childhood cancer, disaster relief, the environment and more. They are the youngest major, global service organization, but have grown to be the largest.
Our local chapter, the Humble Noon Lions Club, focuses on pediatric eye screenings of pre-school children as young as six months. They also:
A Big ‘Thank You’ to Lions and Readers
So, it was quite an honor when the local Lion’s club honored my efforts with ReduceFlooding.com yesterday. My focus is on raising awareness of the causes of flooding and what people are doing to mitigate it…especially in the Houston region.
I never really thought of myself as a humanitarian. I just wanted to make my community a safer place to live. But I will happily accept the award. And it will rest in a place of honor in my home.
Thank you, Lions for all you do. Thank you, Susan Davy, for all your help. And thank you, readers, for keeping the fight alive to make the Houston region a safer place to live. Together, we can do it.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 3/28/2025
2768 Days since Hurricane Harvey
Is it more economic to permit floodplain developments or mitigate them after floods?
3/26/25 – From a public policy perspective, is it more economical to permit floodplain developments or mitigate them after floods? I asked ChatGPT that question this morning. It was consistent with year’s of research on flooding.
The issue pertains directly to posts in the last two days about a proposed development called the Crossing at the Commons of Lake Houston. After being required by the City of Houston to raise the elevation of slabs two feet above the 500-year floodplain, the developer challenged the City all the way to the Texas Supreme Court.
Policymakers, urban planners, and economists wrestle with this question of prevention vs. correction all the time. The short answer: It’s generally more economical to restrict floodplain development than to pay for damages later. Here’s why.
Cost Comparison: Prevention vs. Mitigation
Upfront Development in Floodplains (Short-Term Gain)
A scientific study published in the journal Nature Sustainability found similar results. Every dollar spent acquiring flood-prone land (a specific kind of mitigation) avoids five dollars in damages.
Examples of Mitigation Costs
Smart Prevention Strategies (More Economic in the Long Run)
In the past, Houston allowed extensive floodplain development. As a consequence, it faced massive losses during Hurricane Harvey. Post-flood buyouts and infrastructure repairs have cost billions. The estimated costs of Harvey adjusted for inflation now approach $160 billion.
“While development in floodplains may seem cheaper at first, the long-term economic, environmental, and social costs almost always outweigh the initial savings,” according to ChatGPT.
The developer reaps the profit, but taxpayers bear the costs.
Houston and Harris County
Looking at Houston and Harris County as opposed to national figures, evidence again suggests that proactive floodplain management is far more cost-effective than reactive mitigation.
The enormous expenses associated with post-flood recovery—illustrated by the massive losses from Hurricane Harvey—underscore the economic and social benefits of investing in prevention. Not only does prevention save money, it also helps protect community well-being, property values, and local infrastructure.
Houston and Harris County have adopted several preventive measures. Chief among them:
Floodplain Development Regulations:
Houston enforces stringent regulations for construction within flood-prone areas. The city’s Floodplain Management Office oversees permitting to ensure compliance with the floodplain ordinance and FEMA regulations. Notably, new structures are required to be elevated at least two feet above the 500-year flood elevation to mitigate potential flood damage.
Home Buyout Programs:
The Harris County Flood Control District administers voluntary home buyout programs aimed at relocating residents from high-risk flood zones. These programs have successfully acquired and demolished numerous properties, restoring approximately 1,300 acres to their natural floodplain functions and preventing future flood damages.
Such investments in flood mitigation have proven to be economically beneficial not just nationally, but in Houston, too. Studies indicate that for every $1 spent on mitigation, there is an average savings of $6 in future disaster costs.
$2.5 Billion 2018 Flood Bond
In 2018, Harris County voters passed a $2.5 billion flood bond. While primarily aimed at correcting past problems, it will also prevent future flooding. But so far, most of the money has been spent in Low-to-Moderate Income areas. That leaves more affluent areas, including the Commons of Lake Houston, with elevated flood risk.
All this underscores the need for accurate, up-to-date flood maps.
Posted by Bob Rehak on 3/26/25
2766 Days since Hurricane Harvey
The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.