Big Box Stores in Humble During Harvey

Causes of Flooding Summarized

9/14/2026 – “Causes of flooding summarized” is part of my continuing effort to boil down more than 2 million words in 3100 posts since Hurricane Harvey into short summaries of key topics. I’ve seen the 83 causes of flooding listed below happen over and over again in different places in different combinations at different times. I’ve organized them into three main groupings: Nature, What Humans Do, and What We Fail to Do.

The Three Large Groupings

1. NATURE — Conditions We Largely Cannot Control

These establish the underlying hydrologic and hydraulic setting.

FactorPrincipal effect
Extreme rainfall intensityOverwhelms infiltration and drainage capacity
Extreme rainfall durationProduces large runoff volumes and sustained high flows
Tropical storms and hurricanesCan produce both extreme rainfall and surge
Training/stalled thunderstormsRepeatedly dumps rain over the same watershed
Antecedent rainfallSaturated soils produce much greater runoff
Naturally low infiltration soilsConverts a larger percentage of rainfall to runoff
Flat terrain/low gradientsSlows drainage and increases backwater sensitivity
Watershed size and shapeControls concentration and timing of runoff
Tributary geometryCan cause flood peaks to arrive simultaneously
Coincident tributary peaksProduces unusually high flows at confluences
High downstream water levelsCreates backwater and reduces drainage efficiency
Tides and storm surgeCan impede discharge from coastal watersheds
Natural sediment transportGradually changes channel and reservoir capacity
Natural channel migration/erosionAlters conveyance and can threaten development
Naturally high groundwaterReduces infiltration and drainage capacity

For Houston, flat terrain deserves special emphasis. A relatively small change in downstream water level, sediment accumulation, subsidence, obstruction, or discharge can propagate upstream as backwater because there isn’t much gravitational head available to overcome it.


2. WHAT WE DO — Human Actions that Increase Flood Risk

These can be divided into five mechanisms: more runoff, less storage, less conveyance, altered timing, and greater exposure.

Human actionPrimary mechanism
Add impervious cover↑ Runoff volume and peak
Clear vegetation↑/accelerates runoff
Compact soils during development↓ Infiltration
Install efficient storm sewersAccelerates concentration
Drain natural depressions↓ Storage
Destroy/fill wetlands↓ Storage/infiltration
Fill floodplains↓ Flood storage
Build in floodways↓ Conveyance
Encroach on channels↓ Conveyance
Undersize culvertsCreates bottlenecks/backwater
Undersize bridges/openingsCreates bottlenecks/backwater
Elevate roads with inadequate cross-drainageCreates barriers to overland flow
Channelize/straighten streamsAccelerates downstream flow
Construct leveesRedistributes floodwater/removes storage
Build inadequate detention↑ Downstream runoff
Release detention at unfavorable timesCauses peak stacking
Make reservoir releases during downstream peaksAdds to downstream peak
Operate reservoirs independentlyCan synchronize peaks
Withdraw excessive groundwaterCauses subsidence
Mine sand in active floodplains/floodwaysCan alter channels, erosion and sediment movement
Allow excessive construction erosion↑ Sediment load
Discharge sediment into waterways↓ Conveyance/storage
Dump debris into drainage systems↓ Conveyance
Build in flood-prone areas↑ Exposure
Put critical infrastructure in flood-prone areas↑ Consequences
Continue development upstream of constrained channels↑ Runoff delivered to existing bottlenecks

This category contains an important concept.  A project can make flooding worse by changing where the water goes, how fast it gets there, when it arrives, or how much room is available for it when it gets there.


3. WHAT WE FAIL TO DO — Human Omissions that Allow Flood Risk to Increase

This category captures institutional and cumulative failure, not simply engineering mistakes.

Failure to understand changing risk
FailureConsequence
Fail to update rainfall criteriaInfrastructure designed for obsolete rainfall assumptions
Fail to update flood mapsRisk is systematically understated
Fail to model future developmentInfrastructure becomes undersized
Fail to account for upstream developmentDownstream systems inherit unexpected runoff
Fail to account for subsidenceElevations/gradients become obsolete
Fail to account for changing rainfallDesign assumptions become outdated
Fail to analyze cumulative impactsIndividually small impacts become significant
Fail to analyze runoff timingPeak synchronization goes undetected
Fail to consider downstream tailwaterDrainage performance is overstated
Failure to maintain
FailureConsequence
Don’t maintain channels↓ Conveyance
Don’t remove sediment↓ Channel/reservoir capacity
Don’t maintain storm sewers↓ Drainage capacity
Don’t clean inletsLocal street flooding
Don’t maintain detention basins↓ Effective storage
Don’t maintain detention outletsAlters discharge performance
Don’t maintain culverts↑ Backwater
Don’t repair erosionChannel instability/sedimentation
Don’t remove debris/obstructions↓ Conveyance
Don’t maintain pumps/gatesReduced system reliability
Failure to regulate and enforce
FailureConsequence
Don’t enforce floodplain regulationsEncroachments accumulate
Don’t enforce floodway regulationsConveyance deteriorates
Don’t enforce detention requirementsRunoff increases
Don’t enforce no-net-fill requirementsFloodplain storage disappears
Don’t enforce construction Best Management PracticesSediment enters waterways
Don’t inspect permitted facilitiesProblems remain undetected
Don’t correct known violationsViolations become effectively permanent
Grant repeated variances/exceptionsStandards gradually lose effectiveness
Failure to mitigate known problems
FailureConsequence
Don’t fix known bottlenecksPredictable flooding continues
Don’t enlarge undersized crossingsBackwater persists
Don’t preserve floodplainNatural storage disappears
Don’t preserve wetlandsNatural attenuation disappears
Don’t acquire repeatedly flooded propertiesKnown exposure continues
Don’t complete mitigation projectsResidents remain exposed
Don’t fund maintenanceInfrastructure deteriorates
Don’t fund mitigation proactivelyRecovery substitutes for prevention
Don’t adapt infrastructure after major floodsPrevious vulnerabilities remain
Failure to coordinate
FailureConsequence
Jurisdictions plan independentlyUpstream actions impose downstream consequences
Reservoirs operate independentlyReleases can stack
Counties use different standardsWatershed protection becomes inconsistent
Cities/counties regulate only within boundariesHydrology ignores political boundaries
Agencies optimize individual projectsBasin-wide impacts can be overlooked
No watershed-wide authorityNobody owns the cumulative problem

Conclusion

That last point deserves special attention in the San Jacinto Basin. Some political leaders have actually fought against creating a river-basin-wide flood authority.

But water follows topography, not jurisdictional boundaries. A watershed fragmented among cities, counties, drainage districts, flood-control districts, groundwater districts, river authorities, state agencies and federal agencies creates opportunities for individually defensible decisions to produce collectively undesirable outcomes.

Flood disasters rarely have a single cause. They are usually the product of natural extremes interacting with decades of accumulated human actions and omissions.

And that distinction matters enormously when discussing responsibility. We cannot prevent extreme rainfall. But rainfall alone does not determine how high the water gets, where it goes, how many people are exposed, or how much damage results.

When floods happen, the sheer length of this list encourages finger pointing by those wishing to evade their own responsibility.

Avoiding floods requires everyone to do their part and avoid creating an adverse impact for others.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 9/14/2026

3303 Days since Hurricane Harvey