Tag Archive for: Spring

How Subsidence Amplifies Flood Risk in Lake Houston Area

4/8/26 – Water extraction from aquifers, driven by population growth, causes subsidence. It is a well-recognized phenomenon across the U.S. and in southeast Texas. Here in the Lake Houston Area, differential subsidence is creating a bowl in the landscape that amplifies flood risk for people in southern Montgomery and northern Harris Counties.

Let’s look first at how, why and where subsidence happens. That understanding will help explain how it amplifies flood risk in the Lake Houston Area.

How Subsidence Happens

Extraction of groundwater – faster than nature recharges it – can cause silt and clay layers underground to compact. That compaction is permanent. Think of smashing a brownie; it will never regain its original shape. Innumerable tiny voids in the soil (or brownie) disappear, causing the surface above to sink.

For a more scientific explanation see the Harris Galveston Subsidence District FAQ on “What is Subsidence?”

Why Subsidence Happens

Population growth creates demand for the water in those aquifers, often at the fringes of major metropolitan areas. Developers build new subdivisions faster than water authorities can build pipelines to them from local surface water supplies, such as lakes.

Drilling wells is a much faster, more cost-effective solution at that stage of development – for both the water authorities and developers.

Plus, it’s not just the cost of the pipeline. You need to consider the cost of the water treatment plant. Both together can cost billions of dollars – far more than even a large subdivision could support.

Northeast Water Treatment Plant
Houston’s new Northeast Water Treatment Plant under construction in 2020. Projected cost was $1.7 billion.

Where Subsidence Happens

As a result, subsidence afflicts fast-growing regions across the U.S. Several examples include:

  • Atlantic Coast
    • NASA reports that that more than half of infrastructure in major cities such as New York, Baltimore, and Norfolk is built on land that sank, or subsided, by 1 to 2 millimeters per year between 2007 and 2020. Land in several counties in Delaware, Maryland, South Carolina, and Georgia sank at double or triple that rate. 
  • Chicago
    • 98% of the city reportedly sinks at 2 to 3 millimeters per year.
  • San Joaquin Valley
    • To feed the hungry growing population of the U.S., agricultural interests in the California’s San Joaquin Valley began over-pumping groundwater in the 1920s. According to the U.S. Geological Survey, the land surface there had subsided 30 feet by 1980.
  • Las Vegas
    • The city subsided 5 feet by 1980. But fast-growing Las Vegas extracts three times more groundwater than the natural recharge rate to this day. Subsidence in northern parts of the city forced residents to relocate.
  • Houston
    • During the last 100 years, Houston has consistently ranked among the fastest-growing major U.S. cities according the Census Bureau, frequently placing in the top five and even top two. Its subsidence problems are legendary. Parts of Baytown subsided more than 10 feet before the formation of the Harris-Galveston Subsidence District, causing the Brownwood subdivision to sink beneath Galveston Bay.

Differential Subsidence in the Lake Houston Area

But subsidence is not just a coastal issue. It also can threaten areas far inland. According to Mike Turco, general manager of the Harris-Galveston Subsidence District, areas in Spring has subsided by almost 4 feet and the area around spring has subsided by about 4 feet. Recent subsidence rates in Spring have generally been between 0.5 and 1.0 foot per decade. That’s much faster than at the Lake Houston Dam. So, in effect, we’re creating a bowl in the landscape.

And that bowl amplifies flood risk.

Even though homes may be 75-100 feet above sea level, they may only be one foot above the floodplain.

As water, from say Spring Creek or the San Jacinto West Fork, goes into that bowl, it increases erosion on the upstream side and deposition on the downstream side. That deposition contributes to pooling within the bowl. A double whammy.

So, when a major storm comes along homes may have had their “freeboard factor” wiped out. In engineering and insurance, “freeboard” means your “safety margin above the floodplain.” Live in a place long enough and you may find water creeping closer and closer to your home in successive storms.

Of course, subsidence is only one of many factors that could cause that. But it amplifies those other factors and increases your flood risk.

Past catching up with Montgomery County
Woodloch Subdivision damage near San Jacinto West Fork in Southern Montgomery County from May 2024 flood.

To complicate matters for the poor homeowners shown in the picture above, Dallas-based Scarborough recently purchased 5,300 acres nearby between Spring Creek and the West Fork. Any new subdivisions built on that property would use well-water and further contribute to subsidence.

For More Information

Your safety ultimately depends on maintaining a healthy safety margin – much like the distance between you and the car in front of you on the freeway. We’ve all seen what can happen without enough distance.

For a discussion of other factors that contribute to flood risk, see the Lessons page of this website.

For more on subsidence and flooding, see:

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/8/26

3144 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.

The Real Inequities in Flood-Mitigation Funding

Data obtained via a FOIA Request shows that the watersheds where three top Harris County Democrats live are consuming 25% of flood-bond funding. Meanwhile, those Democrats are starving their Republican opponents and supporters alike of flood-mitigation money.

Harris County Flood Control’s website also shows there are currently no active capital-improvement construction projects in Kingwood, Humble, Huffman, Spring, Atascocita or Crosby. Yet half of all active construction project dollars are going to just three watersheds where the three top Democrat leaders live.

Largest Watershed Among Least Funded

Harris County’s largest watershed – the 215-square-mile San Jacinto – ranks #18 out of 23 watersheds in flood-mitigation funding per square mile under Lina Hidalgo’s administration. That’s according to data obtained from Harris County via a FOIA Request that shows funding through the third quarter of 2022. Neighboring watersheds in the Republican-leaning far northeast part of the county are similarly starved for funding.

Watershed Map of Harris County

Consistent Funding Bias

San Jacinto-watershed residents are not alone. Spring, Jackson and Luce watersheds comprise most of the rest of the northeast portion of the county. They are among the least funded watersheds under Hidalgo whether you measure “total flood-mitigation funding” or “funding per square mile.”

The San Jacinto received only $37 million during Hidalgo’s administration. Spring received $10.1 million. Jackson received just $2.7 million. And Luce received a minuscule $1 million.

These watersheds respectively rank:

  • #12, #18, #20 and #23 in total flood-mitigation funding
  • #18, #19, #21 and #23 in funding per square mile.

Backyard Fringe Benefits

Contrast that with the following totals under Hidalgo in three other watersheds:

  • Buffalo Bayou (91.7 square miles) is less than half the size of the San Jacinto Watershed. It received more – $39.5 million. That’s where County Judge Lina Hidalgo lives. It ranks #12 in total post-Harvey funding.
  • White Oak Bayou ranks #6 in total post-Harvey funding at $94 million. It’s half the size of the San Jacinto (111 sq. mi), but received 2.5X more flood-mitigation funding. Precinct 2 Commissioner Adrian Garcia lives there.
  • Brays Bayou ranks #1 in total post-Harvey funding at $171 million – more than 8 times as much as the San Jacinto. Yet it’s only a little more than half the size (114.2 square miles). That’s where Precinct 1 Commissioner Rodney Ellis lives.

Hidalgo, Garcia and Ellis spent $305 million in the three watersheds where they live. That’s six times more than the $51 million spent for the San Jacinto, Spring, Jackson and Luce Watersheds.

Buffalo, White Oak and Brays watersheds are all in the lead for flood-tunnels, too. Those could add billions more to the backyard benefits received by Hidalgo, Ellis and Garcia!

Funding-Per-Square Mile Comparison

Now, let’s compare what the watersheds above have received in funding per square mile under Hidalgo:

  • Brays = $1.5 million
  • White Oak = $845 thousand
  • Buffalo = $431 thousand
  • San Jacinto = $172 thousand
  • Spring = $169 thousand
  • Jackson = $104 thousand
  • Luce = $45 thousand

The first three above comprise 246 square miles and received $305 million under Hidalgo to date. The bottom four comprise 323 square miles and received $51 million.

So under Hidalgo, Brays, White Oak and Buffalo averaged $1.2 million per square mile. Meanwhile, the Republican-leaning San Jacinto, Spring, Jackson and Luce watersheds averaged only $158 thousand per square mile! That’s about one eighth as much.

Notice a trend? I thought the three Democrats were trying to help the poor with their equity plan. Were they really just trying to punish political opponents through funding inequities? Looking out for themselves all along? Or both?

Parts of the San Jacinto and Spring Creek watersheds experienced water more than 20 feet above flood stage during Harvey while parts of Brays and White Oak didn’t even come out of their banks.

No Active Capital Improvement Projects in Lake Houston Area

And to think! Hidalgo, Ellis and Garcia conned dozens of members of the Northeast Action Collective into requesting Commissioners Court to shift money from Kingwood to Halls Bayou. They said Kingwood was getting all the money! It hasn’t and isn’t.

At the moment, Harris County Flood Control shows NO active capital improvement construction projects in Kingwood, Huffman, Crosby, Humble, Atascocita or Spring.

Screen capture from HCFCD.org on 10/20/22. Capital improvement projects have purple markers. Orange = maintenance projects.

Yet HCFCD is spending $224 million elsewhere in the county on active construction. That includes another $71 million in Brays and $36 million in White Oak for another $107 million total. Almost HALF of the active construction projects in the entire county are going to the watersheds where Ellis and Garcia live!

And that’s in addition to the $305 million that White Oak, Brays and Buffalo already received under Hidalgo.

It takes a lot of chutzpah to spend $412 million protecting your own homes while Low-to-Moderate Income residents elsewhere flood. Now I know why the three pretend Kingwood is getting ALL the money. It’s a diversionary tactic.

Out of $1.65 billion flood-bond dollars spent to date, the watersheds where Hidalgo, Ellis and Garcia live have consumed 25%.

More news to follow as I continue to analyze the latest spending data through the third quarter of 2022.

For the complete response provided by Harris County to my FOIA Request, click here.

This summary worksheet combines funding with other factors such as population, area, damage, etc.

What You Can Do

We have a chance to do something about these inequities starting in a few days. Early voting starts on October 24. You can find polling places here.

Posted by Bob Rehak on October 20, 2022 and updated 10/21 to include spreadsheets and improve clarity.

1878 Days since Hurricane Harvey

The thoughts expressed in this post represent opinions on matters of public concern and safety. They are protected by the First Amendment of the US Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP Statute of the Great State of Texas.