San Jacinto East Fork Archives

4/14/26 – The San Jacinto Watershed received only 1% of all HCFCD spending in Q1, despite being the county’s largest watershed and having the worst flooding.

Harris County Flood Control District (HCFCD) has published updated spending figures for 2018 Flood Bond Projects through the end of the first quarter of 2026. Analysis also revealed:

No Kingwood or Huffman Area projects have reached the construction stage yet
Spending on Lake Houston Area projects continues to lag other watersheds throughout the county.
HCFCD’s years-long spending slowdown may be stabilizing

Separately, Dr. Tina Petersen, PhD, HCFCD’s executive director, recently announced several positive developments for projects on Cypress Creek, the East Fork and Lake Houston Dam.

Let’s look at the funding analysis first. The screen captures below come from the HCFCD Activity Page and speak for themselves.

Overall Spending Slowdown Stabilizing

The chart below shows incremental spending for ALL watersheds since the start of the flood bond in 2018. But the far right shows only one quarter for this year so far. If the first quarter were annualized, it would approximately equal 2025 year-end spending.

*Incremental spending after 2026 Q1 for all watersheds.*

However, all phases of activity have declined dramatically since the management change at HCFCD in 2021.

Where the Money Went in Q1

The chart below shows the San Jacinto Watershed ranked 14th versus others. Of the $52 million total dollars spent, more than half of the watersheds received less than $1 million each. Only five watersheds received more than $2 million. The Cypress Creek Watershed received $22 million (36% of the total). That $22 million was three times more than the next largest watershed – White Oak at $6.76 million.

*Q1 2026 spending for all watersheds totaled only $52 million.*

Petersen attributes construction delays to “getting the funding in place.”

San Jacinto Spending Slowed, Too

Looking closer at the San Jacinto watershed, we can see it dropped sharply. But part of the apparent drop has to do with the fact that you are only looking at one quarter so far for the first quarter of 2026.

*Incremental spending for the San Jacinto watershed since 2018*

In Q1, HCFCD spent only $524,000 in the entire San Jacinto Watershed. Of that, $491,000 came from partners. Only $33,000 came from HCFCD’s bond or budget.

*Breakdown of 2026 Q1 spending in San Jacinto Watershed.* *Dark blue represents partner spending.*

But the most significant takeaway should be the volume of spending in the watershed compared to the total for all watersheds during the quarter…

$.052 million is exactly one one-hundredth of $52 million.
Q1 San Jacinto spending vs. total for all watersheds

And that’s for the county’s largest watershed – where the worst flooding occurred during Harvey. See below.

worst first — *Chart showing feet above flood stage of 33 gages of misc. bayous in Harris County during Harvey.*

Total and Construction Spending

Overall, HCFCD and its partners have spent almost $2.2 billion to date.

*Total spending by watershed associated with the 2018 flood bond*

But most of that has been on upfront studies, engineering and right-of-way acquisitions. Of the total $2.2 billion spent so far, only $1 billion has been on construction – 36%.

*Construction spending through 2026 Q1 from 2018 flood bond.*

Among watersheds, the San Jacinto ranks 13th on construction spending (not including County-Wide Spending) since 2018. White Oak ranks #1 with $148 million. To date, the San Jacinto watershed has received $21.5 million – one seventh of the construction dollars received by White Oak.

Status of Kingwood/Huffman Projects

Only three projects are active in the Lake Houston Area.

The Kingwood Diversion Ditch is still in engineering. It is fully funded and includes:

Additional channel capacity
A new diversion structure at the confluence with Bens Branch
Four bridge replacements
A new outfall to the San Jacinto West Fork south of Deer Ridge Park.

Petersen says construction could start as early as 2027.

She expects the Taylor Gully and the Woodridge Stormwater Detention Basin Project to start construction in May 2026. It is also fully funded and includes:

New stormwater detention basin
Bridge replacement at Rustling Elms
Channel widening and deepening

The Luce Bayou Watershed will receive a new detention basin near FM2100 and the Huffman-Cleveland Road to support regional drainage improvements. Construction plans for the fully funded project are nearing completion, according to Petersen.

Status of Lake Houston Gates and East Fork Detention

Farther upstream on Cypress Creek, Petersen said she expects to finally start construction on the TC Jester East Basin soon. HCFCD also claims to have finished construction on the Mercer Basin on Cypress Creek near the Hardy Tollroad.

When I met with Petersen and State Representative Charles Cunningham last week, she also addressed:

A $20 million Inter-Local Agreement with the City of Houston for new Lake Houston Gates. It is on the 4/16/26 Commissioners Court Agenda. See Item 126.
San Jacinto East Fork stormwater detention basins. It’s unlikely any will be built. But “we’ve identified several locations along the East Fork, where if someone wants to sell their property, we will buy it … and we will get FEMA funding to do that.”.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 4/14/26

3150 Days since Hurricane Harvey

LH Ranch, Ltd has proposed a new wetland mitigation bank for the area upstream from Lake Houston. Part of the land borders the San Jacinto East Fork, opposite Lake Houston Park. Another part to the east stretches across Luces Bayou.

Why Have Mitigation Banks in General?

Such banks provide a way to encourage conservation. They do that by giving ranchers, farmers and other landowners economic incentives, usually in the form of tax breaks, not to develop land. This page by the Texas Agricultural Land Trust explains how the process works. (The Bayou Land Conservancy also offers advice for those interested.)

Developers, pipelines, etc., whose projects will cause unavoidable resource losses elsewhere, negotiate “credits” with such organizations to offset the impacts of their developments.

About the Proposed Lake Houston Mitigation Bank

*LH Ranch would put conservation easements on 952 acres to create two wetland mitigation banks.*

Threatened and Endangered Species

Preliminary indications are that no known threatened and/or endangered species, or their critical habitat will be affected by the proposed work.

Goals of Mitigation Bank

The primary goals of the Lake Houston Mitigation Bank are to protect the water quality of the San Jacinto River system including Luce Bayou and Lake Houston.

From a conservation perspective, restoration projects within the proposed bank could:

Reduce sediment flowing into Lake Houston by 4,000 – 6,000 tons per year
Increase flood storage and reduce pulse flows that exit the property
Restore the ability to transport an amount of sediment adequate for the stream’s watershed
Provide habitat and refuge to wildlife
Establish a dynamically stable forest both resistant and resilient to disturbance
Ensure the longevity and function of the system through long-term conservation measures.

From a mitigation perspective, the bank would also:

Provide resources to allow for compensation of unavoidable (but authorized) impacts to aquatic resources elsewhere
Meet the need for stream and wetland mitigation credits within the service area of the Bank
Meet the need for mitigation outside the service area when approved by USACE.

Specific Actions to Enhance Property

If this proposal is approved, the applicant would:

Place the entire 952.65 Ac. mitigation bank within a perpetual conservation easement held by an accredited land trust.
Restore 53,264 linear feet (ten miles) of severely entrenched, intermittent stream channels that currently have limited access to a floodplain and are actively eroding an estimated 4,000 to 6,000 tons/yr. into the Luce Bayou/San Jacinto/Lake Houston system.
Enhance 1,342 linear feet of severely entrenched, intermittent stream channels.
Protect more than over 10,000 linear feet of Luce Bayou, 10,000 feet of high-quality, unimpaired intermittent tributaries to Luce Bayou, and nearly 5,000 linear feet of ephemeral streams.
Enhance 315.44 acres of stream buffers to reduce erosion, increase flood storage, improve wildlife habitat, and enhance intermittent stream channels.
Establish 150.64 acres of wetlands, approximately half of which are forested, to increase flood storage, water quality, and wildlife habitat.
Restore 6.58 acres of isolated, non-jurisdictional wetlands and reconnect them to intermittent stream channels.
Enhance 107.75 acres of wetlands impacted by previous silviculture operations and invasive species infestation.
Preserve 53.46 acres of high-quality forested wetland habitat associated with the floodplain of Luce Bayou.
Enhance 280.07 Ac. of forested upland buffer habitat to provide additional protection for wetlands and streams within the Bank.

Why This Is Needed

This area has experienced tremendous population growth. Counties within the proposed service area have added nearly 1-million people with an average 16% growth rate from 2010 to 2017.

The extension of SH 99 (the Grand Parkway) will open up vast new areas to development, including a large portion of the mitigation bank’s proposed service area. Additional mitigation banks are necessary to meet increasing demand because of this growth.

This geographic area also possesses a high degree of low-lying wetland areas and streams compared to higher areas. Here are some aerial photos of the area taken January 1, 2021. Timber on the property was recently thinned, something mentioned in the project’s prospectus.

Army Corps Seeking Public Comment

The US Army Corps of Engineers seeks public comment on the LH Ranch proposal which you can find here.

The applicant proposes the establishment and operation of western and eastern tracts within a larger parent tract of the Lake Houston Mitigation Bank (LHMB). The Western Tract is 351.46 acres. The Eastern Tract is 601.19 Acres. The combined tracts total 952.65 acres.

The restoration and enhancement of wetlands and streams would serve as compensatory mitigation for unavoidable, permitted impacts to “waters of the United States.” That designation triggers Corps involvement in the permitting process.

Currently, the site is undeveloped.
Army Corps of Engineers

The Corps has issued a public notice based on information furnished by the applicant. This project information has not yet been verified by the Corps.

A preliminary review of this application indicates that an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is not required. However, that could change depending on input received.

The applicant’s prospectus contains hundreds of maps, photos and descriptions of what they intend to do. (Caution: 151 megabyte, 418 page file.) But don’t let that scare you. For those who want to understand how this fascinating process works, it’s a good read.

CLOSE OF COMMENT PERIOD: All comments pertaining to this Public Notice must reach this office on or before 29 January 2021. If no comments are received by that date, it will be considered that there are no objections.

Comments and requests for additional information should reference file number, SWG-2019-00077 Lake Houston MB, and should be submitted to:

Mitigation Banking Program / Policy Branch Regulatory Division
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
P.O. Box 1229
Galveston, Texas 77553-1229 409-766-3869
Phone 409-766-6301 Fax
Email: swg_public_notice@usace.army.mil

Rehak’s Take

Personally, I feel this project would benefit the Lake Houston Area. There’s little downside, because it’s directly upstream from us. It ensures sensitive wetlands will never be developed. That will help reduce flooding.

That’s especially important with Colony Ridge upstream us. And with a proposed new 8,000 acre development called Kingland just north of the mitigation bank about to kick off. (More on that tomorrow.)

There’s only one potential drawback. In the future, if the Flood Control District ever wanted to do a major drainage project in those areas, it couldn’t because they will be protected by a conservation easement. However, the San Jacinto River Basin Master Drainage Study did not identify either of the areas in this mitigation bank as a priority for a regional detention basin.

All things considered, I’d lock this in now. When the areas north of the mitigation bank are developed, the wetlands will provide some insurance against flooding … sooner rather than later.

Posted by Bob Rehak on 1/10/2021

1230 Days since Hurricane Harvey and 479 since Imelda

Tag Archive for: San Jacinto East Fork

San Jacinto Received Only 1% of HCFCD Spending in 2026 Q1