Jim Zura has posted three videos he shot at Romerica’s public meeting in the Kingwood Community Center on March 18, 2019. The first covers questions I asked Gabriel Haddad, one of Romerica’s two principles, before the meeting officially started. The next two cover questions and answers asked by community members after the formal presentations by Romerica and its suppliers.
Additional Videos to Follow
Zura says additional video will follow. He does national quality work from his base right here in Kingwood. Zura volunteered his services to the community on this project out of concern for the impact the development could have on the community. Please note: Zura fought a high level of ambient crowd noise to obtain these videos. While they won’t win an Emmy for sound quality, they very adequately capture the responses and promises made to the community regarding this controversial development.
The first video is me going one-on-one with Romerica developer Gabriel Haddad.
After presentations by Romerica and its associates, the audience got a chance to ask questions from the floor. Below is the first thirty minutes of the Q&A session.
The last part of the Q&A session runs for another 20 minutes.
Summary: Rehak Interview with Haddad
I ask Mr. Haddad how his development will generate $135 million in tax revenues and point out that that’s more than the rest of Kingwood combined contributes to the City of Houston or Harris County. He responds that that’s only if it’s all built out. I ask, “How likely is that?” He responds: “Not very.” Mr. Haddad then goes on to describe why and blames sedimentation in the river.
Other topics we discussed included:
- How he plans to get around the deed restrictions by Friendswood
- Long-range plans if he can’t get a permit
- Evacuation in the event of a flood
- School district overcrowding
- His maze of companies
- Changing architectural firms in mid-stream, no pun intended
Mr. Haddad answers one or two questions somewhat directly, pivots on others, and claims they’re still working out details on the rest.
Audience Q&A: Part 1
Audience Q&A went for a total of 50 minutes. Unfortunately, some people turned questions into rants. Other people shouted questions from the floor that were not picked up by the microphone. So I’m not going to attempt to transcribe the entire session, but will provide time codes for the questions I could understand. That way you can fast forward to specific segments that may interest you. All time codes are approximate:
- 0:00 Concern about impact on land adjacent to the Romerica development
- 2:00 Concern about flooding and how it will be mitigated
- 3:15 Statement by lady who says she wants “Livable Forest,” not high-rises.
- 3:45 Are you not worried about building high-rises at ground zero for the worst natural disaster in U.S. history?
- 6:45 How are you getting around single-family residential deed restrictions?
- 8:45 Who do you expect to invest and what kind of businesses do you expect to attract? Concerned about inaccessibility of location. Says they will find other locations more attractive. (No response from developer.)
- 10:20. Gentleman asks for vote from floor about who approves/disapproves of development.
- 13:50 Lady observes that every home that flooded had surveys done assuring the owners that it would not. What makes your development different?
- 15:00 Have you engaged hydrologists and do you have money set aside to restore the property if the development fails.
- 17:30 Lady doesn’t like comparison to Woodlands. Says she moved here because it wasn’t so commercial.
- 18:20 Concern about lack of plans for traffic and noise mitigation.
- 22:20 Are you willing to pay for dredging?
- 24:15 How are you going to evacuate people from a dead-end road? Are you going to elevate Woodland Hills Drive?
Audience Q&A: Part 2
The same caveats apply here:
- 0:00 Concerns about loss of view and quiet?
- 2:50 Will you listen to and respect the will of the community?
- 3:30 Will ALL construction be postponed until solution is found for flooding? How will new flood maps and watershed study affect your plans? What’s the time frame for your development? (Hint: Answer: We will not do anything until there is a flooding solution.)
- 9:10 What is the source of your funding?
- 12:15 Do you have backup and failsafe plans?
- 13:15 How will you address flood levels that get worse with time?
As in my interview questions, sometimes the answers were direct and sometimes they weren’t. Sometimes, they just let people rant and didn’t answer at all. By the time Romerica wrapped everything up, most of the audience had left and they were turning out the lights.
Since the meeting, they have had more than a month to address the concerns that more than 700 people and groups submitted in protest letters to the Army Corps.
Now the Corps needs to sift through all their responses and make sure they addressed valid concerns. You can expect plans to change. Romerica has already posted online that they are planning to elevate the entire development another six to ten feet. That will likely involve more fill and stimulate more concerns about flooding.
Thoughts expressed in this post represent my opinions on matters of public interest. They are protected by the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution and the Anti-SLAPP statute of the great State of Texas.
Posted by Bob Rehak on April 28, 2019
607 Days since Hurricane Harvey